[Bug tree-optimization/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

2019-08-13 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419 --- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > OK, so all testcases in this PR use 'int' which means disabling > for !natural_alignment_32 would be enough (unless 'int' is not 32bit ;)) I'd assume

[Bug tree-optimization/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

2019-08-13 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 12 Aug 2019, hp at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419 > > --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- > > (In reply to Richard Biener from

[Bug tree-optimization/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

2019-08-12 Thread hp at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419 --- Comment #2 from Hans-Peter Nilsson --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Jeff also noticed this. The issue should happen on targets where > alignof(int) != sizeof(int) since there we cannot conclude that with int *p, > *q; the

[Bug tree-optimization/91419] [10 Regression]: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr91091-2.c, ssa-fre-61.c, ssa-fre-61.c with r273232

2019-08-12 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91419 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|