[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work||9.3.1 Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- Fixed.
[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Bin Cheng : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95c969e58f7905b14d3f2889cf41595eb2c13cbb commit r9-8411-g95c969e58f7905b14d3f2889cf41595eb2c13cbb Author: Bin Cheng Date: Tue Mar 24 17:40:21 2020 +0800 backport PR94125: Update post order number for merged SCC. Function loop_distribution::break_alias_scc_partitions needs to compute SCC with runtime alias edges skipped. As a result, partitions could be re-assigned larger post order number than SCC's precedent partition and distributed before the precedent one. This fixes the issue by updating the merged partition to the minimal post order in SCC. Backport from mainline. PR tree-optimization/94125 * tree-loop-distribution.c (loop_distribution::break_alias_scc_partitions): Update post order number for merged scc. * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr94125.c: New test.
[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Wed, 18 Mar 2020, amker at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 > > --- Comment #11 from bin cheng --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > > Thanks Bin, fixed on trunk sofar. > > Hmm, if it's fine, I will backport this to GCC9. I think so.
[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 --- Comment #11 from bin cheng --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10) > Thanks Bin, fixed on trunk sofar. Hmm, if it's fine, I will backport this to GCC9. Thanks
[Bug tree-optimization/94125] [9 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94125 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/10 Regression] wrong |[9 Regression] wrong code |code at -O3 on |at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu |x86_64-linux-gnu| Known to fail||9.3.0 Known to work||10.0 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Thanks Bin, fixed on trunk sofar.
