[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

2020-03-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #6) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > > DSE part ... DCE > > DSE = Dead Statement Elimination? DCE = Dead Code Elimination? I thought Dse was dead st

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

2020-03-24 Thread rguenther at suse dot de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 24 Mar 2020, eyalroz at technion dot ac.il wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 > > --- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comme

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

2020-03-24 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > DSE part ... DCE DSE = Dead Statement Elimination? DCE = Dead Code Elimination?

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

2020-03-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

2020-03-23 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #4 from Marc Glisse --- Or just void f(){ int*p=new int[1]; *p=42; delete[] p; } while it does optimize for void f(){ int*p=new int; *p=42; delete p; } because the front-end gives us a clobber before operator delete.

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

2020-03-23 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) You should probably post that comment on the second, related, bug 94294 - which is about the fact that GCC keeps the new and delete. This one is strictly about the

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

2020-03-23 Thread eyalroz at technion dot ac.il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- Note: The bugs also manifest with this slightly simpler program: #include int bar() { std::string second { "Hey... no small-string optimization for me please!" }; return 123; } See: https://god

[Bug tree-optimization/94293] [missed optimization] Useless statements populating local string not removed

2020-03-23 Thread glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94293 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- Adding inline void* operator new(std::size_t n){return __builtin_malloc(n);} inline void operator delete(void*p)noexcept{__builtin_free(p);} inline void operator delete(void*p,std::size_t)noexcept{__builtin_fr