On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:52:48 +0200
Basile Starynkevitch bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
Hello All,
The attached patch to trunk 174518 adds a field invoking_program to the
plugin_gcc_version structure. It informs the plugin about the program
cc1, cc1plus, lto1 using them.
Wrong patch, here
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
(BTW: Original calculation of Ctime_ns has a cut'n'paste error,
stat.Ctime.Nsec should be used instead of stat.Atime.Nsec).
Thanks. Fixed like so. Bootstrapped and ran Go
Please discard the previous one. This is the right one:
David
Index: tree-pretty-print.c
===
--- tree-pretty-print.c (revision 174424)
+++ tree-pretty-print.c (working copy)
@@ -3013,3 +3013,36 @@
On 31.05.2011 23:59, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
On 31.05.2011 22:24, Steve Ellcey wrote:
Bernd,
This patch (r174336) is causing me many testsuite failures on IA64.
Tests like gcc.c-torture/compile/20010408-1.c are dying with a
seg fault in vinsn_detach.
I will look at it tomorrow. Bernd,
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:49 -0700, Jing Yu wrote:
Since this patch has been properly approved, if there is no objection
in 24 hours, I will commit this patch to trunk.
Once a patch has been approved by an appropriate maintainer, anybody
with an account for gcc can commit the patch.
R.
On 31/05/11 16:27, Dmitry Plotnikov wrote:
Would you include this in your patch? Or should we submit it as a
separate patch?
I'm not sure I *can* commit your patches, legally speaking, although
this one is small enough that probably it's ok ... probably.
Perhaps you should submit it
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 8:05 AM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 07:52:48 +0200
Basile Starynkevitch bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
Hello All,
The attached patch to trunk 174518 adds a field invoking_program to the
plugin_gcc_version structure. It
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Please discard the previous one. This is the right one:
See also Honzas comments (on the wrong patch presumably ;)).
+ if (node)
+fprintf (dump_file, \n;; Function %s (%s, funcdef_no=%d,
decl_uid = %d,
Hi,
The vectorizer expects widening multiplication pattern to be:
type a_t, b_t;
TYPE a_T, b_T, prod_T;
a_T = (TYPE) a_t;
b_T = (TYPE) b_t;
prod_T = a_T * b_T;
where type 'TYPE' is double the size of type 'type'. This works fine
when the types are signed. For the
Michael Matz m...@suse.de writes:
Stores are better than builtin functions here, so as to not artificially
take addresses of the decls in question.
For the record, you wouldn't need to take the address if you had an
internal function (internal-fn.def) of the form:
MEM_REF [thing to
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:03 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Please discard the previous one. This is the right one:
See also Honzas comments (on the wrong patch presumably ;)).
+ if (node)
+fprintf (dump_file, \n;; Function %s (%s, funcdef_no=%d,
decl_uid = %d,
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
Hi,
The vectorizer expects widening multiplication pattern to be:
type a_t, b_t;
TYPE a_T, b_T, prod_T;
a_T = (TYPE) a_t;
b_T = (TYPE) b_t;
prod_T = a_T * b_T;
where type 'TYPE' is double the
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 05/31/2011 11:18 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Christian Bruelchristian.br...@st.com
wrote:
Hello,
The attached patch fixes a few diagnostic discrepancies for always_inline
This patch defers the control over size_t and sizetype to the
middle-end which in turn consults the target. This removes
various inconsistencies for frontends that do not seem to care
about size_t and will allow simplifying the global tree initialization.
Bootstrapped on
On 1 June 2011 12:42, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you think about moving pass_optimize_widening_mul before
loop optimizations? Does that pass catch the cases you are
teaching the pattern recognizer? I think we should try to expose
these more complicated
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
This patch merges the LTO streamer hooks from the pph branch.
These hooks are meant to separate streaming work that is specific to
GIMPLE from other modules that may want to stream their own data
structures. In the PPH branch, we are using the
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ira Rosen ira.ro...@linaro.org wrote:
On 1 June 2011 12:42, Richard Guenther richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Did you think about moving pass_optimize_widening_mul before
loop optimizations? Does that pass catch the cases you are
teaching the pattern
On 06/01/2011 12:02 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Christian Bruelchristian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 05/31/2011 11:18 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Christian Bruelchristian.br...@st.com
wrote:
Hello,
The attached patch fixes
Looks OK. One minor formatting comment that I will fix myself when I
commit the patch.
Diego.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4532102/diff/1/pph-streamer-in.c
File pph-streamer-in.c (right):
http://codereview.appspot.com/4532102/diff/1/pph-streamer-in.c#newcode42
pph-streamer-in.c:42:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 06/01/2011 12:02 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 6:03 PM, Christian Bruelchristian.br...@st.com
wrote:
On 05/31/2011 11:18 AM, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 9:54 AM,
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
lvalue_kind has tried to give an approximate answer for value category in
templates; in the past, it was OK to say that an arbitrary expression was an
lvalue, as the only effect would be that errors we could have given at
The attached patch adds support from the ARM Cortex-R5 cpu core. For compiler
purposes this is basically the same as the Cortex-R4, except it supports the
integer division instructions in both ARM and Thumb mode.
The Cortex-A15 also supports this, so I've enabled it there at the same time.
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:50:14AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
I will look into creating helper inlines to reduce code duplication.
Please. You can do this as a follow-up if you prefer.
Sorry it took so long, here it is. Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
and i686-linux, makes zero
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 09:26:23AM -0700, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 05/31/2011 02:19 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-05/msg01182.html
various debug info
Hi!
While working on patches I'm going to post momentarily, I've noticed
a buglet in ucompare handling, mode is the mode of the comparison, while
obviously I meant op_mode which is the mode of the comparison operands.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux,
committed
I noticed that we have a --with-specs option in gcc/configure.ac, added
in revision 155208 with this e-mail message:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-12/msg00132.html
Nathan forgot to commit the ChangeLog entry, so I have committed this
patch to ChangeLog-2009. (Patches to ChangeLog files
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 8:08 PM, Ian Lance Taylor i...@google.com wrote:
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
(BTW: Original calculation of Ctime_ns has a cut'n'paste error,
stat.Ctime.Nsec should be used instead of stat.Atime.Nsec).
Thanks. Fixed
On 2011/06/01 13:06:15, Diego Novillo wrote:
Looks OK. One minor formatting comment that I will fix myself when I
commit the
patch.
Committed as rev 174530.
Diego.
http://codereview.appspot.com/4532102/
Hi,
so here's something more of my patch queue. It adds the facility to merge
also other trees than types over compilation unit borders. This specific
patch only deals with STRING_CST and INTEGER_CST nodes. Originally I used
that place for merging declarations, hence the naming of some
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
so here's something more of my patch queue. It adds the facility to merge
also other trees than types over compilation unit borders. This specific
patch only deals with STRING_CST and INTEGER_CST nodes. Originally I used
that place for
This patch allows the usage of MOVT/MOVW pairs (vs. constant-pool loads)
to be controlled based on the target CPU (-mtune= option), using the ARM
backend's tuning infrastructure. This is to enable constant-pool loads
to be used in preference to MOVW/MOVT instruction pairs, when the
former are
This patch allows the BRANCH_COST macro to be altered for a given
target using the ARM backend's tuning infrastructure. It's not easy
to reduce the cost to e.g. a single integer or a set of integers (cores
may have different branch costing characteristics for ARM vs. Thumb-2
mode for instance, as
On Tue, 31 May 2011, Richard Guenther wrote:
This initializes sizetypes correctly from the start, using target
definitions available. All Frontends initialize sizetypes from
size_type_node for which there is a target macro SIZE_TYPE which
tells what type to use for this (C runtime ABI)
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
so here's something more of my patch queue. It adds the facility to merge
also other trees than types over compilation unit borders. This specific
patch only deals with
Hi,
I noticed this a while ago while working on early merging of decls. When
we build thunk decls ourself we give RESULT_DECL of it integer_type, even
when the thunk decl itself says something else. (In particular thunks can
very well return void or a pointer type). This fixes that glitch.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
I noticed this a while ago while working on early merging of decls. When
we build thunk decls ourself we give RESULT_DECL of it integer_type, even
when the thunk decl itself says something else. (In particular thunks can
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 12:18 +0400, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
On 31.05.2011 23:59, Andrey Belevantsev wrote:
On 31.05.2011 22:24, Steve Ellcey wrote:
Bernd,
This patch (r174336) is causing me many testsuite failures on IA64.
Tests like gcc.c-torture/compile/20010408-1.c are dying with
This test case from the C testsuite started working after the last
merge from trunk.
Collin, this is the test I was referring to yesterday. I'm going to
add some more C test cases to the testsuite that are currently not
working. I think that's going to make our fixing job easier
(otherwise,
This initializes sizetypes correctly from the start, using target
definitions available. All Frontends initialize sizetypes from
size_type_node for which there is a target macro SIZE_TYPE which
tells what type to use for this (C runtime ABI) type.
And this is a prerequisite if you want to do
This patch overrides the branch cost for Cortex-A5 cores, building on
the previous patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00045.html
(And also depending on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00044.html
to apply correctly.)
The rationale is as follows: branches are
This patch tweaks the behaviour of arm_final_prescan_insn when tuning
for Cortex-A5 cores, since branches are cheaper than long sequences of
conditionalised instructions on those processors. As posted in the
previous patch, this provides a measurable increase in performance on a
popular embedded
On 06/01/2011 07:25 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
2011-06-01 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* var-tracking.c (create_entry_value): New function.
(vt_add_function_parameter): Use it.
Ok.
r~
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:24 +0100, Julian Brown wrote:
This patch allows the usage of MOVT/MOVW pairs (vs. constant-pool loads)
to be controlled based on the target CPU (-mtune= option), using the ARM
backend's tuning infrastructure. This is to enable constant-pool loads
to be used in
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:24 +0100, Julian Brown wrote:
This patch allows the BRANCH_COST macro to be altered for a given
target using the ARM backend's tuning infrastructure. It's not easy
to reduce the cost to e.g. a single integer or a set of integers (cores
may have different branch
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:49 +0100, Julian Brown wrote:
This patch overrides the branch cost for Cortex-A5 cores, building on
the previous patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00045.html
(And also depending on:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg00044.html
ada/
* gcc-interface/misc.c (gnat_init): Do not set
size_type_node or call set_sizetype.
OK, thanks.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, 2011-06-01 at 16:49 +0100, Julian Brown wrote:
This patch tweaks the behaviour of arm_final_prescan_insn when tuning
for Cortex-A5 cores, since branches are cheaper than long sequences of
conditionalised instructions on those processors. As posted in the
previous patch, this provides
Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net writes:
On May 30, 2011, at 8:43 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
* The three users of MD_UNWIND_SUPPORT are modified to unconditionally
include a new md-unwind-support.h header which is created from the
info in config.host: if md_unwind_header exists, it is included
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 08:07, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
static void cgraph_expand_all_functions (void);
static void cgraph_mark_functions_to_output (void);
@@ -1092,6 +1093,10 @@ cgraph_finalize_compilation_unit (void)
{
timevar_push (TV_CGRAPH);
+ /* If LTO is
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
The following patch implements the a new option that dumps gcc PASS
configuration. The sample output is attached. There is one
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Richard Earnshaw rearn...@arm.com wrote:
On Tue, 2011-05-31 at 12:49 -0700, Jing Yu wrote:
Since this patch has been properly approved, if there is no objection
in 24 hours, I will commit this patch to trunk.
Once a patch has been approved by an appropriate
On Jun 1, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Both TARGET_64BIT_DEFAULT and TARGET_BI_ARCH live in gcc only, so at
least in the medium term, we need different tests here.
Ah, ick. Oh well... The next more general rule would be something like: one
can set a feature (implicit
This patch is about the pragmas.
In c-family/c-pragma.h, we declare a pragma_handler which is a function
accepting cpp_reader as parameter.
I have changed this handler in order to accept a second parameter which
is a void *, allowing to give extra datas to the handler. I think this
data
On Jun 1, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
One problem remains in the libgo testsuite: certain tests have to be
compiled with -mieee, otherwise FPE is generated for unordered values.
Any suggestions, where -mieee should be placed?
That's an interesting question. I think that
On 06/01/2011 07:51 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
+ /* Set PC to the instruction after the faulting one to skip over it,
+ otherwise we enter an infinite loop. 4 is the size of the stmxcsr
+ instruction. */
...
+ /* We need a single SSE instruction here so the handler can safely skip
The attached is the split #1 patch that enhances -fenable/disable.
Ok after testing?
Thanks,
David
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:34 AM,
On 06/01/2011 05:45 PM, Bryce McKinlay wrote:
Can I suggest that you cc such approvals to gcc-patches. Richard (and
others) may not be subscribed to the j...@gcc.gnu.org list.
Sorry, I meant to do so. This idiot mailer has its reply list button
replying to just the one list, not all the
On 06/01/2011 12:34 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
java/
* decl.c (java_init_decl_processing): Properly initialize
size_type_node.
Index: gcc/java/decl.c
===
--- gcc/java/decl.c (revision 174520)
+++
Hi,
It turns out that my effort last week in canonicalizing the vbic and
the vorn patterns in the neon bug exposed a latent bug while
bootstrapping trunk with Neon which Michael's tester picked up.. The
splitting is slightly tricky because in T2 state you've got the orn
instruction but in ARM
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
On 06/01/2011 07:51 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
+ /* Set PC to the instruction after the faulting one to skip over it,
+ otherwise we enter an infinite loop. 4 is the size of the stmxcsr
+ instruction. */
...
+ /* We need a single SSE
On 06/01/2011 09:01 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The problem with this approach is that some of the macros tested only
live in gcc, not libgcc once the libgcc sources no longer include tm.h
etc. E.g. look at i386/mingw32.h:
#if !TARGET_64BIT_DEFAULT !defined (TARGET_BI_ARCH)
#define
2011/6/1 Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com:
On 06/01/2011 09:01 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
The problem with this approach is that some of the macros tested only
live in gcc, not libgcc once the libgcc sources no longer include tm.h
etc. E.g. look at i386/mingw32.h:
#if !TARGET_64BIT_DEFAULT
Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net writes:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
One problem remains in the libgo testsuite: certain tests have to be
compiled with -mieee, otherwise FPE is generated for unordered values.
Any suggestions, where -mieee should be placed?
That's an
Mike Stump mikest...@comcast.net writes:
On Jun 1, 2011, at 9:01 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Both TARGET_64BIT_DEFAULT and TARGET_BI_ARCH live in gcc only, so at
least in the medium term, we need different tests here.
Ah, ick. Oh well... The next more general rule would be something like: one
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 18:54:38 +0200
Pierre p.vit...@laposte.net wrote:
This patch is about the pragmas.
In c-family/c-pragma.h, we declare a pragma_handler which is a function
accepting cpp_reader as parameter.
I have changed this handler in order to accept a second parameter which
is a
The attached is patch-2 (-fdump-passes) and a sample output:
Ok for trunk?
David
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:51 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:34 AM, Xinliang David Li
On May 31, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On May 30, 2011, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 05/30/2011 12:35 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
One of my patches for PR 48866 regressed guality/asm-1.c on
x86_64-linux-gnu because what used to be a single complex debug
On May 4, 2011, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
This comment looks very weird when added to ia64_option_override
(likewise for other targets). Is there a reason it's not true anymore?
Dunno, but the patch definitely didn't work any more when I retested it.
Maybe it didin't work
I've included the subreg handling as well as the zero_extend handling,
even though make_compound_operation already handles that case correctly.
However, I've cowardly not removed the known_cond subreg handling:
else if (code == SUBREG)
{
enum machine_mode inner_mode = GET_MODE
On 06/01/2011 10:10 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On May 4, 2011, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
This comment looks very weird when added to ia64_option_override
(likewise for other targets). Is there a reason it's not true anymore?
Dunno, but the patch definitely didn't work
Hi, this is a simple patch that support dump_before flag. E.g,
-fdump-tree-pre-before
This is useful for diffing the the IR before and after a pass.
Gcc dumping needs more cleanups -- such as allowing IR only dump,
allowing IR dumping for a particular function etc. The exposure of
'dumpfile'
I went for op. target might have been misleading because the
parameter is sometimes the source (rather than destination) of the
reload.
Thanks.
Here's what I installed after retesting on x86_64-linux-gnu.
Thanks again for the review.
FWIW I also bootstrapped/regtested the first version on
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011, Diego Novillo wrote:
This patch (split out of
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg4.html), fixes the
streaming of enum values when they are larger than a single byte.
Tested with LTO profiledbootstrap on x86_64.
OK for trunk?
Ok.
Thanks,
Richard.
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Hi, this is a simple patch that support dump_before flag. E.g,
-fdump-tree-pre-before
This is useful for diffing the the IR before and after a pass.
Gcc dumping needs more cleanups -- such as allowing IR only dump,
Sorry about it. Here it is.
David
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 10:26 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Hi, this is a simple patch that support dump_before flag. E.g,
-fdump-tree-pre-before
This is
Here is the patch to build arm-elf target with simulator.
It has been committed to the branch.
2011-06-01 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
* lra-eliminations.c (lra_eliminate_reg_if_possible): Fix a typo.
(process_insn_for_elimination): Invalidate insn data if the insn
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:26:24 -0700
Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Hi, this is a simple patch that support dump_before flag. E.g,
-fdump-tree-pre-before
This is useful for diffing the the IR before and after a pass.
Perhaps you forgot to actually attach the patch?
Gcc dumping
On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Basile Starynkevitch
bas...@starynkevitch.net wrote:
On Wed, 1 Jun 2011 13:26:24 -0700
Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
Hi, this is a simple patch that support dump_before flag. E.g,
-fdump-tree-pre-before
This is useful for diffing the the IR
Hi!
This is something I've introduced through cselib_subst_to_values
substing ENTRY_VALUE to corresponding VALUE and have been fixing already
in the
* var-tracking.c (replace_expr_with_values): Return NULL for
ENTRY_VALUE too.
hunk. Apparently there are other 3 places where it
Two of the testcases in this PR were SEGVing for different reasons: one
from excessive recursion exhausting the stack, and the other from
dereferencing a null pointer. This patch fixes both issues.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
commit 0d7f1941a19ce5133c30f8a917379afc6bb31b82
On 05/31/2011 02:05 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
So this patch makes us look through NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR at the actual
underlying tree structure.
It occurred to me that if we're going to do this, we don't need to keep
reference INDIRECT_REFs outside NON_DEPENDENT_EXPR.
Tested
On Jun 1, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On May 31, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On May 30, 2011, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 05/30/2011 12:35 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
One of my patches for PR 48866 regressed guality/asm-1.c on
On May 30, 2011, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 30 May 2011, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
3. expand dominators before dominated blocks, so that DEFs of
replaceable SSA names are expanded before their uses. Expand them
when they're encountered, but not requiring a REG as
Hi,
The attached patch is to fix PR 49238 which is an ice-on-valid-code
with an unrecognizable insn like:
(insn 61 60 62 3 (set (reg:SI 147 t)
(geu:SI (reg:SI 3 r3) (const_int -1 [0x])))
(nil))
SH has GEU comparison only with register operands and we used
a scratch
On Jun 1, 2011, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 06/01/2011 10:10 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
On May 4, 2011, Bernd Schmidt ber...@codesourcery.com wrote:
This comment looks very weird when added to ia64_option_override
(likewise for other targets). Is there a reason it's
Ping.
On 2011/5/9 11:02 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Ping.
On 04/22/2011 11:21 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
Hi Richard, this part's for you.
The ARM backend changes needed are very little after the prior patches,
basically just a case in arm_canonicalize_comparison() to detect
(zero_extend:SI
Ping.
On 2011/5/26 01:29 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/5/20 07:46 PM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/5/20 下午 07:41, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On 17/05/11 14:10, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
On 2011/5/13 04:26 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Sandifordrichard.sandif...@linaro.org writes:
87 matches
Mail list logo
