On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Require a good assembler on ELF targets and just enable this by default
for them without trying a configure test that won't work for cross
compilation (AC_RUN_IFELSE is
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:56 AM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, H.J. Lu wrote:
Oh, I thought it was data
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:50 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case it is simple to analyse that a is a comparison, but you
cannot embed the operations of a into VEC_COND_EXPR.
Sure, but if
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:43 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:34 PM, Richard
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 8:50 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
In this case it is simple to analyse that a is a comparison, but you
cannot embed the operations of a into VEC_COND_EXPR.
Sure, but if
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:39 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 6:02 PM, H.J. Lu
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:48 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:46 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:39 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:34 PM, Richard Guenther
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 10:49 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 9:42 PM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:58 PM, Artem Shinkarov
artyom.shinkar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:50 PM, Richard
Dear all,
this patch added token/offset support for assumed-shape coarray dummies
(with .-fcoarray=lib).
Build and regtested.
OK for the trunk?
* * *
BACKGROUND
For coarrays with -fcoarray=lib, for remote access, one needs to know
two things: token and offset.
a) A token (of type void
On 08/22/2011 02:42 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Use __x86_64__ instead of __LP64__ in setjmp/longjmp and TLS
definitions.
H.J.: Is that sufficient for x32, or do we need entirely different code?
If so, can you please provide the required changes?
The SJLJ part should be ok for x32.
The TLS
On 08/22/2011 02:54 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
Move x86 TLS definition to linux/x86.
* config/x86/tls.h: Moved to ...
* config/linux/x86/tls.h: ... here.
Ok.
r~
On 08/19/11 15:55:12, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Index: gcc/c-family/c-common.h
===
--- gcc/c-family/c-common.h (revision 177894)
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.h (working copy)
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ enum rid
/* C extensions */
On Mon, 22 Aug 2011, Gary Funck wrote:
On 08/19/11 15:55:12, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Index: gcc/c-family/c-common.h
===
--- gcc/c-family/c-common.h (revision 177894)
+++ gcc/c-family/c-common.h (working copy)
@@ -103,7
On 08/22/11 22:39:04, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
[...]
This isn't a type modifier; neither is __builtin_types_compatible_p. It's
not within the first 28.
[...]
I don't believe the comment is accurate; I'm not aware of any code for any
C-family front end that uses these values as mask bits at
Hello!
2011-08-23 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/64/sfp-machine.h (ASM_INVALID): New define.
(ASM_DIVZERO): Ditto.
(FP_HANLDE_EXCEPTIONS): Use ASM_INVALID and ASM_DIVZERO.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu {,-m32}. Committed to mainline SVN, will
be backported
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Dimitrios Apostolou ji...@gmx.net wrote:
Hello again,
most of this patch was posted at the beginning of my GSOC adventure and
primarily is about replacing fprintf() calls with custom faster ones. From
that time I changed minor things you suggested, omitted
101 - 116 of 116 matches
Mail list logo