Dear Tobias,
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 11:27 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> When passing a CLASS to a TYPE, the "_data" component wasn't added for
> scalar variables. (Polymorphic arrays are/were handled correctly.)
>
> This patch adds the _data, fixing this wrong-code issue.
>
> Build and regtested on
Hi Jakub
Instead of disabling the sibcall, it could also be a valid tail call
optimization by moving the str after ldmia, and change the used
register(It should be handled by RA automatically), as following
...
add r4, r1, r4, lsl #2
ldmia r2, {r1, r2}
> -Original Message-
> From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de]
> Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012 4:45 AM
> To: Weddington, Eric
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Denis Chertykov
> Subject: Re: [Patch,AVR]: Clean up hard-coded SFR addresses
>
>
> Here is an updated patch without the S
When passing a CLASS to a TYPE, the "_data" component wasn't added for
scalar variables. (Polymorphic arrays are/were handled correctly.)
This patch adds the _data, fixing this wrong-code issue.
Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
2012-02-06 Tobias Burnus
PR fort
And fix a linker error (which I can't reproduce) on TLS targets, which
can use an explicit instantiation because it doesn't refer to an
unnamed closure type.
PR libstdc++/52128
* src/c++11/future.cc: Add explicit instantiation.
Tested x86_64-linux, powerpc-linux, i686-linux, x86_6
On Feb 6, 2012, at 12:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> And, really, we ought to come up with some trick to eliminate some of the
> redundancy in patterns in the md file too.
:-) That'd be awesome...
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/05/2012 07:27 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> Hello!
>>
>> Attached patch enables post-reload compare optimization pass for x86 targets.
>
> Hmm. Well, the only thing that's going to work for x86 is the double-compare
> elimination portio
Hi Dominique,
The test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 because double are not
vectorized. I think the following patch is required:
Thanks for noticing this!
I applied this patch as obvious after regression-testing.
Thomas
2012-02-06 Thomas König
PR fortran/32373
*
In this testcase, we ended up trying to call an uninstantiated template,
and get confused as a result. This patch changes the compiler to not
consider a template to be a valid candidate for a default conversion.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applied to trunk
commit 06d4f1b83e5c393fd22421bbd12135
On 02/05/2012 07:27 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> Attached patch enables post-reload compare optimization pass for x86 targets.
Hmm. Well, the only thing that's going to work for x86 is the double-compare
elimination portion.
If we want to use this pass for x86, then for 4.8 we should als
Dear All,
The attached is obvious fix to this regression and I will commit
tomorrow evening if there is no objection.
Cheers
Paul
2012-02-06 Paul Thomas
* resolve.c (resolve_fl_derived0): Typebound functions support
assumed character length results.
2012-02-06 Paul Thomas
Hi!
combine_simplify_rtx and its helpers (called from subst) apparently modify
the given RTL in-place, there are many SUBST () calls all around those
functions. On the attached testcase in particular on arm when
newpat = subst (newpat, i1dest, i1src, 0, 0, 0); is called, force_to_mode
modifies th
Attached patch applied
2012-02-06 François Dumont
* include/debug/safe_iterator.h
(_Safe_iterator::_M_before_dereferenceable): Avoid the expensive
creation of a _Safe_iterator instance to do the check.
François
On 02/05/2012 06:30 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 02/05/20
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Quentin Neill
wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> On 11/07/2011 07:28 PM, Quentin Neill wrote:
>> > + Add FMA4 to bdver2.
>> > + * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Add FMA4
>> > to bdver2.
>>
>> Ok.
Thanks for the patch.
"Moore, Catherine" writes:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Chung-Lin Tang [mailto:clt...@codesourcery.com]
>> Sent: Monday, January 30, 2012 4:36 AM
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rdsandif...@googlemail.com
>> Cc: Moore, Catherine
>> Subject: Re: [committed] PR 51931
[forking for different topics]
"Maciej W. Rozycki" writes:
> On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> > I don't think _mcount has ever worked for dynamic libraries, has it? --
>> > please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe `gprof' relies on memory
>> > segments to be contiguous whi
"Maciej W. Rozycki" writes:
>> > We have only about now got MIPS16 shared libraries to work -- are you
>> > sure removing code to save/restore $2/$3 in the dynamic linker is going to
>> > hit anyone?
>>
>> Pretty sure. There are two separate points here. Support for MIPS16
>> shared librarie
On Feb 4, 2012, at 11:20 AM, Robert Millan wrote:
> El 1 de febrer de 2012 1:06, Mike Stump ha escrit:
>> On Jan 31, 2012, at 2:29 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>> On Sun, 29 Jan 2012, Robert Millan wrote:
Please consider this patch to stddef.h. GNU/kFreeBSD has the same
problem with __size
On Feb 5, 2012, at 12:26 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> PRs libstdc++/51296 and libstdc++/51906 are both caused by problems
> with the Pthreads static initializer macros such as
> PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER.
> On Mac OS X 10.7 the PTHREAD_RECURSIVE_MUTEX_INITIALIZER is buggy.
Thanks for all you work
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01835.html changed the
> code I'm tweaking here to use DFmode subregs when loading a TFmode
> constant into regs for e500. This just extends that change to all
> rs6000 targets, the simplest fix I fo
On Sat, 4 Feb 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > I don't think _mcount has ever worked for dynamic libraries, has it? --
> > please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe `gprof' relies on memory
> > segments to be contiguous which is certainly not the case for a dynamic
> > executable where
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 3:53 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> On 11/07/2011 07:28 PM, Quentin Neill wrote:
> > + Add FMA4 to bdver2.
> > + * config/i386/i386.c (ix86_option_override_internal): Add FMA4
> > to bdver2.
>
> Ok.
>
>
> r~
This patch was okay'd in stage 3 but was never commi
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, 2 Feb 2012, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > >
> > > > Linus Torvalds writes:
> > > >
> > > > > Seriously - is there any real argument *agains
This fixes PR 52155.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Richard.
2012-02-06 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/52115
* tree-sra.c (access_has_replacements_p): New function.
(sra_modify_assign): Use it to decide whether a use is
Looks good to me.
Thanks,
Richard.
Thanks folks. I have committed the patch, and will close the PR.
Aldy
On Mon 06 Feb 2012 13:18:34 GMT, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:13:58PM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
Anyway, is this patch OK?
Are you asking approval for 4.8, or 4.7? For the latter this doesn't
seem to be a regression bugfix that would be suitable for stage4.
Yes, sorry, t
Hello!
This patch updates baseline symbols for alpha-linux-gnu.
2012-02-06 Uros Bizjak
* config/abi/post/alpha-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Regenerated.
OK for mainline?
Uros.
Index: config/abi/post/alpha-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt
This fixes PR50955 - IVOPTs can end up expressing a pointer value
using unrelated pointer bases. This confuses alias analysis.
The fix is to extend the existing stop-gap we have in place
to cover the case in question.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknonw-linux-gnu.
I have also benchmarked
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 01:13:58PM +, Andrew Stubbs wrote:
> Anyway, is this patch OK?
Are you asking approval for 4.8, or 4.7? For the latter this doesn't
seem to be a regression bugfix that would be suitable for stage4.
> 2012-02-06 Andrew Stubbs
>
> gcc/
> * config/arm/arm
On Mon, Feb 6, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The attached testcase is miscompiled on arm*, by doing a sibcall when setup
> of one argument overwrites incoming arguments used to setup parameters in
> later insns.
> The reason why
> mem_overlaps_already_clobbered_arg_p/check_sibcal
This patch adds DImode shift support in NEON registers/instructions.
The patch causes delays any lowering until the split2 pass, after the
register allocator has chosen whether to do the shift in NEON (VFP)
registers, or in core-registers.
The core-registers case depends on the patch I previo
Hi!
On the following testcase we ICE in dwarf2out, because
apparently reg-stack changed a
(var_location:SI D#1 (subreg:SI (reg:SF 8) 0))
into
(var_location:SI D#1 (reg:SF 8))
(note the subreg is gone and mismatching mode). The problem seems
to be in get_true_reg function that subst_stack_regs_in_
Hi!
The attached testcase is miscompiled on arm*, by doing a sibcall when setup
of one argument overwrites incoming arguments used to setup parameters in
later insns.
The reason why
mem_overlaps_already_clobbered_arg_p/check_sibcall_argument_overlap
fails to detect is that the caller has non-zero
Weddington, Eric wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Georg-Johann Lay [mailto:a...@gjlay.de]
>> Sent: Friday, February 03, 2012 12:47 PM
>> To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Cc: Denis Chertykov; Weddington, Eric
>> Subject: [Patch,AVR]: Clean up hard-coded SFR addresses
>>
>> This patch r
On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On some targets e.g. sms-7.c test fails, because fprintf is called
> with %s format and NULL argument, GLIBC prints for that e.g.
> SMS loop num: 1, file: (null), line: 0
> but it isn't portable. print-rtl.c guards the locator printin
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Bin Cheng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the patch fixing pr51867 by removing the redundant check on
> DECL_ASSEMBLER_NAME_SET_P.
> I also changed '-O0' to '-O1' in signbit-2.c and added a new test.
> The new test case won't bite if target cpu does not support hardware sq
Thomas,
The test fails on powerpc-apple-darwin9 because double are not
vectorized. I think the following patch is required:
--- /opt/gcc/_gcc_clean/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90
2012-02-05 23:32:31.0 +0100
+++ /opt/gcc/work/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/vect/vect-8.f90
Hi,
This patch enhances mixed condition pattern detection to work with
non-constant integral then and else clauses. It checks that 'then' and
'else' are results of type conversion from the comparison type to their
current type, and generates the whole cond_epxr in comparison type
(ignoring the co
38 matches
Mail list logo
