Hey, Jing, you broke the google/gcc-4_6 branch by checking the new
header file into the wrong directory.
Fixed via r184386.
Ollie
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 10:25 PM, Jing Yu wrote:
>
> OK. Thanks for porting the patch.
> I will commit the patch into google/gcc-4_6_2-mobile for you.
>
> I would al
On Sun, 19 Feb 2012, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> I know when ahead and committed this patch
Ahem, make this: I now went ahead...
Gerald
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file, 'gcc-4.7-b20120128.sv.po',
Hi,
this is what I'm going to apply. Seems straightforward enough to go in now.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
2012-02-19 Paolo Carlini
PR libstdc++/52309
* include/bits/hashtable_policy.h (_Equality_base<, true,>::
_M_equal(const _Hashtable
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> On Feb 15, 2012, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>
>> I'm fine with putting it in and seeing what breaks. But I'd really
>> prefer if we knew in theory. :-)
>
> Ok, I dove into the problem without a testcase, and I managed to trigger
> it on other platforms after tweaking get_
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 02/04/2012 02:06 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> > Actually I had that idea of a link-once function too, but it turned out
>>> > quite complicated to do without rewriting some generic parts of GCC as it
>>> > is currently not prepared to emit link-once functions
Richard Henderson writes:
> On 02/16/2012 10:58 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> As a workaround for 4.7, you can try this hack:
>>>
>>> .cfi_startproc simple
>>> .cfi_def_cfa29, -1 # fake cfa one byte below sp
>>> .cfi_register 29, 29 # "save" sp in itself so w
> Ping?
> > ...
> > * gfortran.dg/vect/pr32380.f: XFAIL on PowerPC and ia-64.
This fixes the failure on powerpc-apple-darwin9 (see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2012-02/msg01809.html ).
The fix is a little bit brutal since two loops are vectorized
on powerpc-apple-darwin9, but I don't th
On Tue, 14 Feb 2012, Jayant R. Sonar wrote:
> I have not worked on these changes before. Therefore, can you please
> review the attached patch and let me know if any changes are required
> to be done in it.
Index: wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.7/changes.html
===
