On Mar 12, 2012, at 11:59 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
On 12/03/12 14:58 , Doug Kwan wrote:
2012-03-12 Doug Kwandougk...@google.com
* contrib/testsuite-management/arm-grtev2-linux-gnueabi.xfail:
New file.
OK.
Hum, kinda makes be wish we had all the xfail files for the release
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 20:15 +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
William J. Schmidt wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
OK, will do. I just copied the style of some other test cases that
skipped darwin, assuming that was the preferred syntax.
No problem, I'll probably make a pass over the whole
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:29 PM, William J. Schmidt wrote:
Thanks, Rainer. Here's a revised patch. OK to commit?
Ok. Thanks.
On 12/03/12 15:27 , Mike Stump wrote:
So, I guess the question is, is there a down side to doing that? I can imagine
a
if [ -r $srcdir/contrib/testsuite-management/$target.xfail ]; then
$srcdir/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py bla
bla
fi
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:24 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the patch which is equivalent to clearing MASK_TLS_DIRECT_SEG_REFS
when Pmode != word_mode. We need to keep
else if (Pmode == SImode)
{
/* Always generate
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
2012-03-12 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_gen_tls_global_dynamic_64): New.
(ix86_gen_tls_local_dynamic_base_64): Likewise.
(ix86_option_override_internal): Set
On 12 March 2012 17:03, Rainer Orth wrote:
Continuing with the patches to remove obsolete ports, here's the IRIX
6.5 removal patch.
...
* libstdc++-v3/doc/xml/manual/internals.xml still uses IRIX as an
example. I've kept that part since I guess it's up the libstdc++
maintainers to decide
On 12 March 2012 17:44, Rainer Orth wrote:
Since even extended support for Solaris 8 ends by March 31st, this patch
removes Solaris 8 support from mainline. Given that extended support
for Solaris 9 lasts until October 2014, I guess that will remain in GCC
for at least one major release.
The
Thanks. That seems to get me into Ada bootstrap land together with
the following two patches applied (but not when I apply only the
first patch due to the stale TREE_OVERFLOW bits on type/decl sizes).
You're welcome. Let me give them a whirl...
--
Eric Botcazou
Rainer == Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Rainer libjava:
Rainer * configure.ac (THREADLIBS): Remove *-*-solaris2.8 handling.
Rainer * configure: Regenerate.
This part is ok. Thanks.
Tom
Rainer == Rainer Orth r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de writes:
Rainer libcpp:
Rainer * lex.c: Remove Solaris 8 reference.
Also ok.
Tom
Add GCC support for -gfission option. Debug info is partitioned
into skeleton sections that will remain in the .o file, and dwo
sections that will be moved to a .dwo file. After compilation,
the gcc driver calls objcopy twice: once to extract the dwo
sections into the .dwo file, and a second
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 04:26:21PM +0100, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Martin Jambor wrote:
when we expand a misaligned MEM_REF on the LHS, we must not call the
code in expand_expr_real_1 if the subsequent patch is applied, because
the code generates code
On Mar 12, 2012, at 12:37 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
Ideally, though, we would not even need this hack. 'make check' should
return 0 when every test is nominal. Period.
Yeah, that pig has yet to achieve lift-off. :-)
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Rainer Orth wrote:
Tested with make doc/gccinstall.info doc/gccinstall.pdf, ok for mainline
and 4.7 branch?
+Sun does not ship a C compiler with Solaris 2 before Solaris 10, though
+you can download the Sun Studio compilers for free. In Solaris 10 and
+11, GCC 3.4.3 is
[Revised patch to fix problem with ASM_FINAL_SPEC in the case where
neither -c nor -o are specified.]
Add GCC support for -gfission option. Debug info is partitioned
into skeleton sections that will remain in the .o file, and dwo
sections that will be moved to a .dwo file. After compilation,
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 7:42 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
2012-03-12 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_gen_tls_global_dynamic_64): New.
(ix86_gen_tls_local_dynamic_base_64):
On 2012/03/12 21:32:46, Cary wrote:
[Revised patch to fix problem with ASM_FINAL_SPEC in the case where
neither -c nor -o are specified.]
Add GCC support for -gfission option. Debug info is partitioned
into skeleton sections that will remain in the .o file, and dwo
sections that will be
Thus, I suggest that the choice of d should be based on readability
and usefulness for the common case rather than guaranteeing an exact
roundtrip.
I'm not sure I see the value in this choice. In addition to standard
requirements, quality of implementation issues shouldn't be neglected. At
* Although libgcc/config/sparc/sol2-unwind.h could be simplified quite a
bit, perhaps we could go further: I wonder if the remaining nframes = 2
case really applies to Solaris 9. If not, one could massivly simplify
this code.
Please no, let's keep being very conservative with this
On 12 March 2012 18:58, Doug Kwan dougk...@google.com wrote:
Hi Diego
This patch adds arm-grtev2-linux-gnueabi.xfail for our 4.6 branch
so that we can track regressions. This just established the test
baseline. The failures need to be investigated.
Just out of
Hi Ramana,
We know the limit of the QEMU and already noticed failure due to
the simulator. Like I said, this is used as the baseline. We are
going to look at the failures carefully to categorize them. We
noticed that some tests fail randomly on QEMU, these are marked as
flaky and the
This patch makes -fsized-delete define a macro __GXX_DELETE_WITH_SIZE__. If
this macro is defined, the deallocate function in new_allocator.h invokes
the two parameter delete operator with the size of the object. Tested by
bootstrapping the compiler and ensuring no tests are broken. Also verified
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
OK for google/main and google/4_6 branches?
You will need to check this into google/gcc-4_7 as well.
Ollie
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 3:35 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:39 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 10:24 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Here is the patch which is equivalent to clearing MASK_TLS_DIRECT_SEG_REFS
when Pmode
ok. As Ollie said, it needs to be in google/gcc-4_7 as well.
David
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:03 PM, Easwaran Raman era...@google.com wrote:
This patch makes -fsized-delete define a macro __GXX_DELETE_WITH_SIZE__. If
this macro is defined, the deallocate function in new_allocator.h invokes
the
I forgot to commit headers, but that was fixed in an hour. At the
moment trunk builds
K
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:36 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 1:16 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
The patch is OK for mainline, if there are no further
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
