On Sat, 31 Mar 2012, Eddie Kohler wrote:
The syntax is very simple. The extra argument, an even-length C string
constant, is interpreted as a set of character pairs. For example, % says
interpret the character '' like you would '%': as a conversion specifier
that consumes no arguments from
Hi,
The attached patch updates the top comment block in constraints.md and
removes the unused Sr0 constraint.
Tested with 'make all-gcc'.
OK?
Cheers,
Oleg
ChangeLog:
* config/sh/constraints.md: Update list of constraints in
comment block.
(Sr0): Remove unused memory
Hi H.J.
On 31 Mar 2012, at 20:24, Jack Howarth wrote:
The latest gcc-pr52784-2.patch patch also allows current gcc trunk
to
bootstrap on i386-apple-darwin10.
Despite the fact that bootstrap is restored, there remain problems
with this patch and some more work is needed.
(a)
On 8 April 2012 06:09, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/07/2012 06:29 PM, Manuel López-Ibáńez wrote:
I'll be happy to change it to whatever is more understandable. I think
in CSS is called padding.
That wouldn't be any clearer; my confusion was that I thought you were
padding
On Thu, 29 Mar 2012, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
Hi,
I have made a new patch to only have two builtins :
* __builtin_cpu_is (CPUNAME)
* __builtin_cpu_supports (FEATURE)
apart from the cpu init builtin, __builtin_cpu_init.
I don't see any .texi file as part of this change. Shouldn't
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 4:38 AM, Iain Sandoe idsan...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi H.J.
On 31 Mar 2012, at 20:24, Jack Howarth wrote:
The latest gcc-pr52784-2.patch patch also allows current gcc trunk to
bootstrap on i386-apple-darwin10.
Despite the fact that bootstrap is restored, there
On 8 April 2012 17:14, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2012 06:09, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/07/2012 06:29 PM, Manuel López-Ibáńez wrote:
I'll be happy to
On 8 April 2012 06:09, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/07/2012 06:29 PM, Manuel López-Ibáńez wrote:
+getenv_columns (void)
I had been thinking to check COLUMNS once at the beginning of compilation; I
don't think the value can change while the compiler is running since we
don't
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2012 17:14, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 7:06 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2012 06:09, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2012 06:09, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/07/2012 06:29 PM, Manuel López-Ibáńez wrote:
+getenv_columns (void)
I had been thinking to check COLUMNS once at the beginning of compilation;
On 8 April 2012 18:35, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2012 06:09, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On 04/07/2012 06:29 PM, Manuel López-Ibáńez wrote:
+getenv_columns
On Apr 8, 2012, at 3:25 AM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
In principle we want extensibility of format checking, and want it to be
as flexible as the built-in checking is regarding the peculiarities of
different formats - but we also don't want to export implementation
details of format checking
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2012 18:35, Gabriel Dos Reis g...@integrable-solutions.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 8, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez
lopeziba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 April 2012 06:09, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
On 8 Apr 2012, at 15:54, H.J. Lu wrote:
Despite the fact that bootstrap is restored, there remain problems
with this
patch and some more work is needed.
(a) [trivial] the option 'mx32' is in i386.opt, which means it is
exposed to
all sub-targets, even if they don't support it.
$
Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de wrote:
The attached patch updates the top comment block in constraints.md and
removes the unused Sr0 constraint.
Tested with 'make all-gcc'.
OK?
OK.
Regards,
kaz
Committed as obvious. I wasn't sure if one should move the declaration
to c-pretty-printer.h, but updating the comment cannot make any harm.
(And why default_tree_printer is in toplev.c?)
Index: gcc/tree-pretty-print.h
===
---
Recently I was hunting for bugs in __cxa_guard_acquire/release that
might result in pr52839. No bugs found, but I did notice that these
functions use excessive memory barriers, no doubt from their
conversion from sync to atomic builtins.
Making the second __atomic_compare_exchange_n in
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 23:53 +0200, Oleg Endo wrote:
On Fri, 2012-04-06 at 10:46 +0900, Kaz Kojima wrote:
From: Oleg Endo oleg.e...@t-online.de
Exposing three-letter macro MSW and LSW globally looks not
a good idea to me.
Would 'HIGH_WORD' and 'LOW_WORD' be OK as an alternative?
On 04/08/2012 12:13 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
To focus on the issue at hand, and independently of whether any bugs
exist or not, and whether I am capable or not to fix them. What you
are proposing is to change the current default of no line-wrapping to
line-wrap at getenv(COLUMNS), isn't
gcc.dg/guality/pr45003-*.c have regressed with reordering of the
exploration of the loc expansion space, in a way that didn't always
privilege expansions without ENTRY_VALUEs over ones with it.
This patch fixes it, by ensuring that we'll only ever use ENTRY_VALUEs
if we can't help it given a
Ping? (Updated with improved docs; should the options be renamed to
-ftree-copyrename-* to match the option that covers the entire pass?)
On Jun 4, 2011, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Oct 13, 2009, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
On Jun 1, 2009, Alexandre Oliva
21 matches
Mail list logo
