Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
(3) Also related to libraries, I edited CRT_CALL_STATIC_FUNCTION to emit
a 32-bit code sequence under both MIPS/MIPS16 mode (under O32).
As you can see in the original Feb. patch, I had changes to emit a
MIPS16 version of these static
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
My only comment is that you add a coretypes.h include to tree-flow.h and
remove one from tree-ssa-alias.h - but since the GCC convention is that
all .c files start with includes of config.h, system.h and coretypes.h
On 2012/7/6 02:23 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
(3) Also related to libraries, I edited CRT_CALL_STATIC_FUNCTION to emit
a 32-bit code sequence under both MIPS/MIPS16 mode (under O32).
As you can see in the original Feb. patch, I had changes
Revised patch attached. It still generates the same (fixed) debug info
for the reduced testcase. I'll do a full testing cycle if you're happy
with it.
* dwarf2out.c (function_possibly_abstracted_p): New static
function. (gen_subprogram_die): Use it
Hi!
For runtime stack protector enabling on x86 for Android we have to
disable current glibc-based implementation and turn on default one
since bionic doesn't use value from gs:0x14.
Tested in android environment(x86_64-*-linux-android), also
bootstrapped and regtested on
Hi
I updated this patch to use const_ok_for_dimode_op to decide if a
const is legal for iordi3 insn. The special cases of all 0 and all 1
constant are also handled.
Tested on arm qemu with all thumb/arm neon/non-neon combination, no regression.
thanks
Carrot
2012-07-06 Wei Guozhi
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
+cc c++ front-end maintainers
Hi,
C++ Frontend maintainers, Could you please take a look at the
front-end part when you find the time?
So you have (for now?) omitted the C frontend change(s)?
Honza, your
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 11:53 PM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
This is a first stab at making the core CFG code independent of the
expression intermediate representation datatypes. This patch deals
with cfg.c and cfganal.c but it shouldn't be a surprise that the patch
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Magnus Fromreide wrote:
On Thu, Jul 05, 2012 at 11:51:19AM +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tristan Gingold wrote:
On Jul 4, 2012, at 8:31
Hi Jeff,
Thanks - patch committed. I decided that it would be best to call
default_encode_section_info first, just in case it turns out to be
important one day.
Cheers
Nick
Hello!
2012-07-06 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.c (construct_plt_address): Make static.
* config/i386/i386-protos.h (construct_plt_address): Remove.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed to mainline SVN.
Uros.
Index: i386-protos.h
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 05/07/12 15:30, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tom de Vries wrote:
The asserts allow the return result to be optimized, but not the cfg
conditions.
AFAIU, we can insert the asserts earlier. F.i., we
On Jun 21, 2012, Alexandre Oliva aol...@redhat.com wrote:
Here's one more patch that addresses a problem I found out while
investigating the PR53671 regressions: rather than recording incoming
stack args as MEMs with non-VALUE expressions, it's more consistent (and
less surprising) if we emit
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Yes, I think that would be the most clean solution - unfortunately
the current setup of the toplevel hierarchy does not support this
(easily, at least). A way out would be to always claim stuff is
installed - thus, use the =system variants and add
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Yes, I think that would be the most clean solution - unfortunately
the current setup of the toplevel hierarchy does not support this
(easily, at least). A way out would be to always claim stuff is
Right, flag_android looks better, thanks.
Probably it's even better to check also bionic (OPTION_BIONIC)
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Andrew Pinski pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:49 AM, Igor Zamyatin izamya...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi!
For runtime stack protector enabling
Hello,
On a gcc 4.7 tree, we are witnessing build failures on Aix 5.2 with libstdc++
failing on
...pthread/libstdc++-v3/include/powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0/bits/gthr-posix.h:789:69:
error: 'pthread_mutex_timedlock' was not declared in this scope
The anomaly is visible from the libstdc++
On Jul 6, 2012, at 15:04 , David Edelsohn wrote:
libstdc++-v3/
* acinclude.m4 (check for mutex_timelock): Check straight
on _POSIX_TIMEOUTS, regardless of defined (_PTHREADS).
* configure: Regenerate.
It's okay with me, but I do not know who can approve it. Yes,
Hello,
in testing a patch on arm-linux-gnueabihf, I ran into a bootstrap comparison
failure that turned out to be caused by a pre-existing bug in common code,
where combine.c code exposed undefined behaviour.
The problem is this code in force_to_mode when simplifying a LSHIFTRT:
/* Here
Since my fix for 53563, we were ignoring alias templates when looking
for a type template name. Fixed thus.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit d46136fac2f8b4b126d498031b4bb02a23d5738a
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 6 09:21:51 2012 -0400
PR
On 12-07-06 00:38 , Sandeep Soni wrote:
I am halfway through the patch for building gimple_cond statements. I
will be able to complete the patch over the weekend. I am also working
towards a patch that generalizes the assignment statements considering
all possible types of assignments.
Great!
Hi,
tested x86_64-linux, committed mainline and 4_7-branch.
Thanks,
Paolo.
2012-07-06 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR libstdc++/53872
* include/std/thread (thread::_M_make_routine): Qualify make_shared
to prevent ADL.
*
On Wed, Jul 4, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello!
Attached patch partially reverts r187375 [1]. Apparently, the patch
added some new functionality to symtab_remove_unreachable_nodes,
although the ChangeLog said:
Log:
...
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
Hello!
Sometimes, gcc generates:
leaq(%rbx,%rax), %rax
that is in fact equivalent (modulo flags reg clobber) to:
addq%rbx, %rax
Attached patch adds additional peephole2 patterns that convert LEA to
ADD when second operand of PLUS RTX
Hi,
This patch reduces codesize for cases such as this one:
int arr[100];
int foo () { return arr[10]; }
Before the patch, the code looked like this:
adrp x0, arr
add x0, x0, :lo12:arr
ldr w0, [x0,40]
Now, it looks like this:
adrp x0, arr+40
ldr w0, [x0,#:lo12:arr+40]
Some workloads
tsubst doesn't handle pack expansions directly; any place where a pack
expansion is valid needs to test for them and call
tsubst_pack_expansion. Here, the code for testing whether a non-deduced
template argument is relevant to the argument types was failing to do
so. Conveniently, we already
On 06/07/12 13:01, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 05/07/12 15:30, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 5 Jul 2012, Tom de Vries wrote:
The asserts allow the return result to be optimized, but not the cfg
conditions.
AFAIU,
Note that most other places in force_to_mode optimizing shifts already
check for non-negative shift amounts; but in this place the check is
missing.
The following patch adds the check here as well, fixing the undefined
behaviour (and subsequent bootstrap comparison failure) in my test.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:14 AM, Richard Guenther
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 10:13 PM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
+cc c++ front-end maintainers
Hi,
C++ Frontend maintainers, Could you please take a look at the
front-end part when you
Between June 12 and June 28 I checked in lots of GCC testsuite patches
to individual tests and to test infrastrure files to eliminate
non-unique lines in test summaries, as well as a few related cleanups.
May I backport those to GCC 4.7?
Janis
On 27 June 2012 21:27, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 06/20/2012 05:44 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
+ case NEON_DUP:
+ if (TREE_CODE (argp[0]) == INTEGER_CST
+ || TREE_CODE (argp[0]) == REAL_CST)
+ return build_vector_from_val
Working on LRA regression on ppc after the merge, I found that lo_sum
support improves code size significantly. Here the patch to support lo_sum.
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86/x86-64 and ppc.
Committed as rev. 189333.
2012-07-05 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
Hi Mikael, hi all,
Mikael Morin wrote:
index f135af1..6c58a8e 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
+++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-array.c
@@ -8319,12 +8323,15 @@ gfc_walk_array_ref (gfc_ss * ss, gfc_expr *
expr, gfc_ref * ref)
break;
case AR_FULL:
- newss = gfc_get_array_ss (ss,
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 5:24 PM, Andi Kleen a...@firstfloor.org wrote:
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com writes:
Sometimes, gcc generates:
leaq(%rbx,%rax), %rax
that is in fact equivalent (modulo flags reg clobber) to:
addq%rbx, %rax
Attached patch adds additional peephole2 patterns
On 03.07.2012 15:37, Richard Guenther wrote:
People are running into issues when mixing cloog built against isl 0.08
and gcc building against isl 0.10 (which is expected I guess).
CLooG needs to be configured to use GMP
+internally, use @option{--with-bits=gmp} to direct it to do that.
why
Hi,
After inlining, IPA calls tree_profiling which rebuilds edges:
#2 0x00683ccd in rebuild_cgraph_edges ()
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/cgraphbuild.c:433
#3 0x00c02de6 in tree_profiling ()
at /export/gnu/import/git/gcc/gcc/tree-profile.c:564
#4 0x00a1be4f
36 matches
Mail list logo
