Hi Gerald,
As it becomes our long term goal to deliver arm-none-eabi tool chain based
on GCC 4.6/4.7/4.8 and future branches, I am going to use the following
pattern to document this branch family. Is it ok to commit?
BR,
Terry
Index: htdocs/svn.html
=
Il 07/07/2012 17:34, Steven Bosscher ha scritto:
> On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:06 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>> Are you sure this the right patch? -fno-tree-dominator-opts is still here.
>
> I am sure it is not the right patch :-)
> Thanks!
>
> Index: libgcc/config/t-darwin
> ==
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Steven Bosscher
>> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> This patch moves the emit_case_bit_tests method of switch lowering
>>> from 'expand' to a GIMPLE
On Sun, 2012-07-08 at 20:51 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > The recent change that removed the inclusion of tree.h in several places
> > broke the SH target in one place in sh.md, where stuff from tree.h was
> > used directly. I'
Hello,
In PR53690, a UCN is incorrectly interpreted in C++11 mode. The value
should be 0 but is converted to 1 by libcpp U'\U'.
The reason is that _cpp_valid_ucn converts all 0 results to 1, by
default. I am not 100% sure why that is (there is no comment and the
code has been like that si
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The recent change that removed the inclusion of tree.h in several places
> broke the SH target in one place in sh.md, where stuff from tree.h was
> used directly. I've moved those lines in question into a new function
> in sh.c.
> Tested with make all-gcc.
>
> OK to install?
Hello,
A lot of optab_handler checks are against CODE_FOR_nothing, which is
currently a target dependent number, the last value in "enum
insn_code". This made target reinitializing slow, so Richard S.
changed the optab_handler index from insn_code to (insn_code -
CODE_FOR_nothing) to allow the tab
On Sun, Jul 8, 2012 at 5:43 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The recent change that removed the inclusion of tree.h in several places
> broke the SH target in one place in sh.md, where stuff from tree.h was
> used directly. I've moved those lines in question into a new function
> in sh.c.
I sup
Please find attached v2 of the patch updated for trunk 20120706, x86 only,
tested on
x86-linux-gnu, KFreeBSD and the Hurd.
I left in the comment about the multiarch names, but I'm fine to change/discard
it. It was first required by Joseph Myers, then not found necessary by Paolo
Bonzini. The patc
Steven Bosscher wrote:
>Hello,
>
>IMHO, no RTL pass implementation file should have to include tree.h.
>So ira-conflicts.c shouldn't need tree.h. The reason it needed it, was
>because there is code to avoid putting user variables in callee
>clobbered registers, and ira-conflict.c looked at DECL_A
Hello,
The recent change that removed the inclusion of tree.h in several places
broke the SH target in one place in sh.md, where stuff from tree.h was
used directly. I've moved those lines in question into a new function
in sh.c.
Tested with make all-gcc.
OK to install?
Cheers,
Oleg
ChangeLog:
Oleg Endo wrote:
> The attached patch adds the 'nott' insn that is supported by SH2A.
> While the 'nott' pattern itself is usually combined away entirely (CSiBE
> shows no diffs for SH2A), on non-SH2A the new patterns seem to catch a
> few border cases, where unnecessary movt sequences can be elim
Hello,
IMHO, no RTL pass implementation file should have to include tree.h.
So ira-conflicts.c shouldn't need tree.h. The reason it needed it, was
because there is code to avoid putting user variables in callee
clobbered registers, and ira-conflict.c looked at DECL_ARTIFICIAL
(REG_EXPR (reg)). But
Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
>> From: Richard Sandiford
>> Date: Wed, 9 May 2012 11:14:49 +0200
>
>> Hans-Peter Nilsson writes:
>> >> From: Richard Sandiford
>> >> Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 16:46:38 +0200
>> >
>> >> To repeat: as things stand, very few targets define proper rtx costs
>> >> for SET.
>
On 07/07/2012 08:38 PM, Xinliang David Li wrote:
It seems to me that what you have here are target-specific attributes that
affect the signature of a function such that they make two declarations
different that would otherwise declare the same function. Stepping away from
the specific notion of v
> Request for testing because I have no access to a Darwin machine.
I just finished a clean bootstrap with the (second!-) patch on
x86_64-apple-darwin10; regtesting scheduled for tonight.
Bootstrapping powerpc-apple-darwin9 is now at stage 2.
Dominique
PS AFAICT pr26840 is indeed fixed.
Hello,
I've had this patch some time now, it's simple and cosmetic only, I
had done it while trying to understand expression costs in CSE. I
think it's more readable than the previous one. FWIW it passed all tests
on x86.
Thanks,
Dimitris=== modified file 'gcc/cse.c'
--- gcc/cse.c 2012-06
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 12:35 AM, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 03.07.2012 15:37, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> People are running into issues when mixing cloog built against isl 0.08
>> and gcc building against isl 0.10 (which is expected I guess).
>
>> CLooG needs to be configured to use GMP
>> +intern
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 5:59 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Since r177358, a host executable gengtype is built so that plugins can
> use the GTY markers.
>
> Even for the host, gengtype is a GENERATOR_FILE, but since the build-%
> rule doesn't apply to host objects, gengtype was being buil
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> Wow ;) I agree about the set_loop_copy/get_loop_copy change - I'd simply
>> postpone it with a comment why cfgloop.h is needed and investigate the
>> pointer-map idea.
>
> Yes,
On Sat, Jul 7, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> Hello,
>
> As suggested by Joseph. Subject says all. This turned out to be easier
> than I expected: Almost all Makefile rules already include
> coretypes.h, I only had to adjust something for realmpfr.o.
>
> Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-l
Hi, Richard,
A test is added. Is it ok?
Thanks,
Dehao
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2012-07-08 Dehao Chen
* gcc.dg/debug_info_inline.c: New test.
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/debug_info_inline.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/d
22 matches
Mail list logo