On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:16 PM, Diego Novillo dnovi...@google.com wrote:
Not so much, anymore
(http://gcc.gnu.org/codingconventions.html#Variable). When gimplefe
is merged into trunk, we will be using the C++ conventions which now
allow this.
No need to change anything, Sandy.
Ah..Saved
Steven,
I think your patch broke bootstrapping with Graphite enabled.
Tobias
PS: Possible patch, I haven't checked whether 0 makes sense or
something else should be used.
--- a/gcc/graphite-poly.c
+++ b/gcc/graphite-poly.c
@@ -675,3 +675,3 @@ print_pbb_body (FILE *file, poly_bb_p pbb, int
Hi Guys,
I am checking in this patch to the mainline to document the ARM port's
-munaligned-access command line option.
Cheers
Nick
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-07-18 Nick Clifton ni...@redhat.com
* doc/invoke.texi (ARM Options): Document -munaligned-access.
Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 15:26 -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
On Jul 17, 2012, at 1:06 PM, Oleg Endo wrote:
The attached patch adds the test case from comment #3 of PR 38621 to the
test suite.
Tested with
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=compile.exp=pr38621.c --target_board=sh-sim
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
I overlooked adding a pass-control flag for strength reduction, added
here. I named it -ftree-slsr for consistency with other -ftree- flags,
but could change it to -fgimple-slsr if you prefer that for a pass named
gimple-ssa-...
Bootstrapped
Yunfeng ZHANG zyf.zer...@gmail.com writes:
It took me a couple of minutes to understand what you meant here, so
please let me re-phrase to make sure I got it.
You are saying that the callback function of the cb_lex_token event is
set by the callback function of the macro_start_expand event.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:24 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
This caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54008
Yes, they failed in my testing, too. I must have been blind to overlook them...
I received some comments in private about the new look of the dumps,
that I'll be
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de wrote:
Steven,
I think your patch broke bootstrapping with Graphite enabled.
Yes it did. That's twice in one week, because Graphite isn't enabled
for builds on the compile farm. I'll see if I can install the
necessary libraries on
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
I overlooked adding a pass-control flag for strength reduction, added
here. I named it -ftree-slsr for consistency with other -ftree- flags,
but could change it to
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
Carrot,
Sorry about the delayed response.
On 3 July 2012 12:28, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:14 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
On
Now, back to PR53970, where #pragma pack() is used to pack a
struct. With #pragma pack() no part of the type or field-decls
have a hint that packing took place (well, their align information
tell you), which means the vectorizers use of contains_packed_reference
is not conservative enough,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
I overlooked adding a pass-control flag for strength reduction, added
here. I named it -ftree-slsr for consistency with
In the past, -fstrength-reduce applied to loop strength reduction in
loop.c. I don't think it should be re-used for a completely different
code transformation.
Seconded.
--
Eric Botcazou
On 07/17/2012 11:29 PM, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Mikael Morin wrote:
On 17/07/2012 20:52, Tobias Burnus wrote:
Build and regtested on x86-64-gnu-linux.
OK for the trunk?
I should have bootstrapped and not just build the patch. It then fails
in libgfortran:
Warning:
On 18 July 2012 09:20, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
Carrot,
Sorry about the delayed response.
On 3 July 2012 12:28, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:14 AM,
On 18 July 2012 07:51, Nick Clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi Guys,
I am checking in this patch to the mainline to document the ARM port's
-munaligned-access command line option.
Could you ask if RM's object to backporting this to the 4.7 branch. ?
Thanks,
ramana
Cheers
Nick
Hi Richard,
I have a documentation update for the 4.7 branch. Is it OK to apply
this ?
Cheers
Nick
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-07-18 Nick Clifton ni...@redhat.com
* doc/invoke.texi (ARM Options): Document -munaligned-access.
Index: gcc/doc/invoke.texi
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, nick clifton wrote:
Hi Richard,
I have a documentation update for the 4.7 branch. Is it OK to apply this ?
Sure.
Thanks,
Richard.
Cheers
Nick
gcc/ChangeLog
2012-07-18 Nick Clifton ni...@redhat.com
* doc/invoke.texi (ARM Options): Document
With get_object_alignment and get_object_or_type_alignment fused
it is now easy to fix PR53970 and remove the bogus
contains_packed_reference function. The vectorizer wants to know
whether the scalar access is aligned in a way that peeling
can eventually reach VF * scalar alignment (thus, vector
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 July 2012 09:20, Carrot Wei car...@google.com wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@linaro.org wrote:
Carrot,
Sorry about the delayed response.
On
On 07/12/2012 08:52 AM, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
* config/s390/s390.c (s390_builtin,code_for_builtin_64,
code_for_builtin_31,s390_init_builtins,s390_expand_builtin):
Remove.
(s390_expand_builtin_thread_pointer): Add hook function for
This fixes a spurious 'noreturn' function does return warning at -O0 on code
involving controlled types.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline.
2012-07-18 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
* gcc-interface/trans.c (stmt_group_may_fallthru): New function.
This fixes a spurious 'noreturn' function does return warning at -O0 on code
involving an exception block. I overlooked this case when I implemented the
mechanism in gimple-low.c during the 4.5 development phase.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, OK for the mainline?
2012-07-18 Eric Botcazou
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 11:01 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
I overlooked adding a pass-control flag for strength
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 08:24 -0500, William J. Schmidt wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 11:01 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:59 AM, Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
wrote:
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, William J. Schmidt
Hi Richard,
This patch adds support for the -mmcu option to gcc. Okay to commit?
Thanks,
Catherine
2012-07-18 Maciej W. Rozycki ma...@codesourcery.com
Chao-ying Fu f...@mips.com
* config/mips/mips.opt (mmcu): New option.
* config/mips/mips.h
On 06/26/2012 10:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
+ /* Set to (size_t)-1 if the size check fails. */
+ if (size_check != NULL_TREE)
+*size = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, sizetype, size_check,
+original_size, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (sizetype));
VEC_safe_insert (tree, gc, *args,
Here's the patch with documentation changes included. I also cleaned up
missing work from a couple of my previous patches, so
-fhoist-adjacent-loads is documented now, and -fvect-cost-model is added
to the list of options on by default at -O3.
Ok for trunk?
Thanks,
Bill
2012-07-18 Bill
This is a regression present on mainline and 4.7 branch for targets using SJLJ
exceptions by default in Ada (e.g. ARM). The error message is:
+===GNAT BUG DETECTED==+
| 4.8.0 20120716 (experimental) [trunk revision 189525] (x86_64-suse-linux)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:24 PM, William J. Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
It turns out I was looking at a very old copy of the manual, and the
-ftree... stuff is not as prevalent now as it once was. I'll just go
with -fslsr to be consistent with -fgcse, -fipa-sra, etc.
Sadly, it
This is a regression present on mainline and 4.7 branch. The error message is:
p.adb: In function 'P.Proc':
p.adb:3:4: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment
system__address
void (*T590) (void)
r.callback.callback.address = q__proc;
+===GNAT BUG
On 07/18/2012 03:55 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/26/2012 10:29 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
+ /* Set to (size_t)-1 if the size check fails. */
+ if (size_check != NULL_TREE)
+*size = fold_build3 (COND_EXPR, sizetype, size_check,
+ original_size, TYPE_MAX_VALUE (sizetype));
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, William J. Schmidt wrote:
Here's the patch with documentation changes included. I also cleaned up
missing work from a couple of my previous patches, so
-fhoist-adjacent-loads is documented now, and -fvect-cost-model is added
to the list of options on by default at -O3.
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 3:24 PM, William J. Schmidt
wschm...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
It turns out I was looking at a very old copy of the manual, and the
-ftree... stuff is not as prevalent now as it once was. I'll just go
with -fslsr to be
This is a regression present on mainline and 4.7 branch for targets using SJLJ
exceptions by default in Ada (e.g. ARM). The error message is:
Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 20 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.
b1_2(ab) and b1_20(ab)
+===GNAT BUG
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
This is a regression present on mainline and 4.7 branch for targets using SJLJ
exceptions by default in Ada (e.g. ARM). The error message is:
+===GNAT BUG
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:25 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
This is a regression present on mainline and 4.7 branch. The error message
is:
p.adb: In function 'P.Proc':
p.adb:3:4: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment
system__address
void (*T590) (void)
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 4:54 PM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
This is a regression present on mainline and 4.7 branch for targets using SJLJ
exceptions by default in Ada (e.g. ARM). The error message is:
Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 20 which are marked as MUST COALESCE.
On 07/17/12 17:11, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
The patch below adds an v850-*-rtems* target configuration to GCC.
It's a sightly modified copy of the v850*-*-* target, with some RTEMS
specific changes added.
I would like to apply this patch to trunk and gcc-4_7-branch.
OK to commit?
Yes. This
This patch was written on top of the big assumed-shape patch.* However,
it should also work by itself.
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86-64-linux.
OK for the trunk?
Tobias
* http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2012-07/msg00052.html
2012-07-18 Tobias Burnus bur...@net-b.de
* decl.c
On 07/18/2012 05:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/17/12 17:11, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Hi,
The patch below adds an v850-*-rtems* target configuration to GCC.
It's a sightly modified copy of the v850*-*-* target, with some RTEMS
specific changes added.
I would like to apply this patch to trunk and
Ping (retrying ping in plain text mode so that it goes through properly).
Thanks,
Teresa
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Teresa Johnson tejohn...@google.com wrote:
Ports some patches related to improving FDO program summary information
and using it to guide loop unrolling from google
On Jul 17, 2012, at 7:00 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
Like the subject line says; this is consistent with the existing test to bail
out for MIPS bare-metal. OK for mainline?
Ok.
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 02:04:41PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
Hi,
Since x32 may generate 64-bit integer divide like
67 48 f7 bd a0 fe ff ff idivq -0x160(%ebp)
we need to check and skip 67h address size for x32. OK for trunk if
there are no regressions on Linux/x86-64?
Thanks.
Hi,
Resending. I did not get any responses the last two times and I too
forgot about it. Can someone please review this?
Thanks,
Siddhesh
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:46:53 +0530
From: Siddhesh Poyarekar siddh...@redhat.com
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Fw: [PATCH]
Hi Richard,
Now that we are in the window for 4.8, I'd like to discuss the possibility of
applying this patch. Have you had a chance to think about it?
Thanks,
Catherine
-Original Message-
From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:rdsandif...@googlemail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 06, 2012
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 2:24 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
This caused:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54008
Yes, they failed in my testing, too. I must have been blind to overlook
them...
Moore, Catherine catherine_mo...@mentor.com writes:
+mmcu
+Target Report Mask(MCU)
+Use MCU instructions
Please use Var(TARGET_MCU) instead, in order to avoid eating up
target_flags. OK with that change, thanks.
Richard
Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com writes:
While working on my favorite mips option (-msynci) I noticed an odd thing.
If I compile with '-mips32 -mips16 -msynci' I got a warning about synci not
being supported but if I compiled with '-mips32r2 -mips16 -msynci' I did not
get a warning, even though
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:21:00PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
/* The root of the compilation pass tree, once constructed. */
extern struct opt_pass *all_passes, *all_small_ipa_passes,
*all_lowering_passes,
Index: gcc/tree-if-switch-conversion.c
On 07/18/2012 05:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
2012-07-16 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR libjava/53973
* include/x86_64-signal.h (CHECK_67H_PREFIX): New.
(HANDLE_DIVIDE_OVERFLOW): Check and and skip 67h address size
prefix if CHECK_67H_PREFIX is 1. Use ULL suffix for
Hello,
This is my proposed fix for PR53948. We don't want to put user
variables in callee-clobbered registers, but obviously function
arguments are OK there. REG_USERVAR_P is set on PARM_DECLs and on user
variables, so it can't be used to distinguish between the two.
As it turns out, I can
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/18/2012 05:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
2012-07-16 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR libjava/53973
* include/x86_64-signal.h (CHECK_67H_PREFIX): New.
(HANDLE_DIVIDE_OVERFLOW): Check and and skip 67h address
Hello Steven,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:46:16 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
This is my proposed fix for PR53948.
I can't speak for the GCC code but could it have a GCC testcase?
Thanks,
Jan
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:34 PM, Andrew Haley a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/18/2012 05:30 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
2012-07-16 H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com
PR libjava/53973
* include/x86_64-signal.h
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:55 PM, Jan Kratochvil
jan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
Hello Steven,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 19:46:16 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
This is my proposed fix for PR53948.
I can't speak for the GCC code but could it have a GCC testcase?
I wouldn't know what to test for.
Hello!
As with all other mode switching macros, we need to pass entity index
also to MODE_AFTER macro. In a multi-entity mode switching case, we
usually don't have same modes for all entities, and we should be able
to return the mode that applies to a specific entity. It looks that
epiphany port
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:27 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
This patch defines FFI_SIZEOF_JAVA_RAW to 4 for x32, similar to MIPS n32.
It fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982
Here is the patch with updated ChangeLog entry. X32 has the same issue
as MIPS n32,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:05:46 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
I wouldn't know what to test for. Looking for a .loc marker seems a bit
fragile.
What is fragile on
// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times \\.loc\t1 3 0\\r\\n\t\[^.\] 6 } }
or something like that. Line numbers are constant for the
Hello Dimitrios,
With the attached patches I introduce four new obstacks in struct
cpp_reader to substitute malloc's/realloc's when expanding
macros. Numbers have been posted in the PR, but to summarize:
before: 0.785 s or 2201 M instr
after: 0.760 s or 2108 M instr
Memory overhead
Hi!
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 20:48:23 +0200, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
Please find attached v2 of the patch updated for trunk 20120706, x86 only,
tested on
x86-linux-gnu, KFreeBSD and the Hurd.
As suggested by Diego Novillo I have now attached this patch to
http://gcc.gnu.org/PR53468.
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 08:55:17PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012 20:05:46 +0200, Steven Bosscher wrote:
I wouldn't know what to test for. Looking for a .loc marker seems a bit
fragile.
What is fragile on
// { dg-final { scan-assembler-times \\.loc\t1 3 0\\r\\n\t\[^.\]
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 6:27 PM, H.J. Lu hongjiu...@intel.com wrote:
This patch defines FFI_SIZEOF_JAVA_RAW to 4 for x32, similar to MIPS n32.
It fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982
Here is the
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 9:10 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch defines FFI_SIZEOF_JAVA_RAW to 4 for x32, similar to MIPS n32.
It fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53982
Here is the patch with updated ChangeLog entry. X32 has the same issue
as MIPS n32,
When I ran the C++ testsuite with -fabi-version defaulting to 0, I
noticed a couple of tests that failed because they were expecting the =2
mangling. I also noticed that the demangler didn't understand the
correct mangling for new-style casts.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
Bernhard,
thanks for the review.
On 18/07/12 19:32, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 01:21:00PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
/* The root of the compilation pass tree, once constructed. */
extern struct opt_pass *all_passes, *all_small_ipa_passes,
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
+tree-if-switch-conversion.o : tree-if-switch-conversion.c $(CONFIG_H) \
+$(SYSTEM_H) $(TREE_H) $(TM_P_H) $(TREE_FLOW_H) $(DIAGNOSTIC_H) \
+$(TREE_INLINE_H) $(TIMEVAR_H) $(TM_H) coretypes.h $(TREE_DUMP_H) \
+
On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 18:30 +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
The abort sounds like the bug here. It's deliberate that things like
-msynci, -mbranch-likely, etc., are OK with -mips16. On the one hand,
you could compile with -mips16 but have an __attribute__((nomips16))
function that could
On Wed, 18 Jul 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, testing in progress.
Richard.
2012-07-18 Richard Guenther rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/53970
* tree.h (contains_packed_reference): Remove.
* expr.c
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012, Matthias Klose wrote:
Please find attached v2 of the patch updated for trunk 20120706, x86 only,
tested on
x86-linux-gnu, KFreeBSD and the Hurd.
Currently, Debian gcc packages for hppa contain multiarch support. Because
of this, I have used a multiarch patch for testing
To Dodji Seketeli:
Thanks for you check my patch, I will release it again later.
Yunfeng
On 07/12/2012 07:06 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
I notice that your patch changes the behavior of C++98/03 mode as well,
which seems wrong to me; I think this is a big enough change that we
should limit it to C++11 mode.
...except that I can't figure out what the semantics before this DR were
Thanks very much Uli for verifying my conclusions about reload,
operand predicates and constraints, and particularly the general
unusability of the o constraint.
Re http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-07/msg00142.html, this patch adds
the missing secondary reload patterns, corrects constraints I got
From: John David Anglin d...@hiauly1.hia.nrc.ca
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 21:12:26 -0400
I imagine other Debian ports are in a similar situation.
GCC hacking has been extremely painful on sparc for me because of this
debian multiarch situation, so yes I'm in this group as well.
74 matches
Mail list logo
