On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:08:08AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2012-11-06 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avx_u128_mode_after): Don't
look for reg in CALL operand.
OK.
You can also break the loop after reg is found.
I have committed the
PR bootstrap/55211
Revert:
* config/sparc/constraints.md (U): Delete.
* config/sparc/sparc.md: Use 'r' constraint instead of 'U'.
* config/sparc/sync.md: Likewise.
And revert parts of:
* doc/md.texi: Sync sparc constraint documentation with
Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the patch and valuable comments.
You need to use match_dup instead of a matching constraint.
Done.
Every one that isn't explicitly invoked should have a leading *
in the name.
Done.
Please find attached the modified patch and let me know if it's okay?
Thanks
This should be fixed by a patch I committed directly before you
sent your mail (which is why you did not see it yet). Can you
please verify?
Bootstrap has completed at revision 193278 (with the patch for
dwarf2out.c.
Thanks,
Dominique
On 6 November 2012 19:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 6 November 2012 18:21, Paolo Carlini wrote:
testsuite/20_util/scoped_allocator/1.cc:79: void test02(): Assertion
`evv[0].get_allocator().get_personality() == 2' failed.
I didn't really investigate it...
Oops, looks like I missed
Hi,
The attached is yet another create_pre_exit patch to fix
PR middle-end/49220 which is an ice-on-invalid-code. It's for
non-void function which returns without value. The patch is
tested with bootstrap and the top level make -k check on
i686-pc-linux-gnu with no new failures and regtested on
Hi,
while analyzing c-ray I noticed two issues. First is that I originally set
number
of size/time entries to 32. Once we reach this limit we conservatively account
everything as unconditional. This limit is not met on relatively simple
testcases, like ray-sphere. The reason is that aggregate
On 21/10/12 00:14, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
the attached patch adds initial support for the latest release of
the IBM mainframe series - the IBM zEnterprise EC12 (zEC12).
Nice. Can you please also add a note to the release notes at
Hi,
with inliner predicates, the inliner heuristic now is able to prove that
some of the inlined function body will be optimized out after inlining.
This makes it possible to estimate the speedup that is now used to drive
the badness metric, but it is ignored in actual decision whether function
is
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 08:08:08AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2012-11-06 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_avx_u128_mode_after): Don't
look for reg in CALL operand.
OK.
You
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
with inliner predicates, the inliner heuristic now is able to prove that
some of the inlined function body will be optimized out after inlining.
This makes it possible to estimate the speedup that is now used to drive
the badness metric,
expand_assignment calls:
if (MEM_P (to_rtx))
{
/* If the field is at offset zero, we could have been given
the DECL_RTX of the parent struct. Don't munge it. */ to_rtx =
shallow_copy_rtx (to_rtx);
set_mem_attributes_minus_bitpos
2012-11-07 Kaz Kojima kkoj...@gcc.gnu.org
PR middle-end/49220
* mode-switching.c (create_pre_exit): Set short_block if there
are no copy insns.
OK, but clearly a rewrite of the function would be in order.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:57 AM, Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com wrote:
2012-11-07 Kaz Kojima kkoj...@gcc.gnu.org
PR middle-end/49220
* mode-switching.c (create_pre_exit): Set short_block if there
are no copy insns.
OK, but clearly a rewrite of the function would be
Hi,
instead of writing again and again the same conditional, I'm finishing
testing the below, will install soon if everything goes well.
Thanks,
Paolo.
2012-11-07 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
* include/debug/array (_GLIBCXX_THROW_OR_ABORT): Move...
Hi,
On 11/07/2012 10:18 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 6 November 2012 19:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 6 November 2012 18:21, Paolo Carlini wrote:
testsuite/20_util/scoped_allocator/1.cc:79: void test02(): Assertion
`evv[0].get_allocator().get_personality() == 2' failed.
I didn't really
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
with inliner predicates, the inliner heuristic now is able to prove that
some of the inlined function body will be optimized out after inlining.
This makes it possible to estimate the speedup that is now used to drive
the badness
Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Please also add the testcase from the PR to the testsuite.
For the record, I've committed the testcase below from the PR.
Regards,
kaz
--
2012-11-07 Kaz Kojima kkoj...@gcc.gnu.org
* gcc.c-torture/compile/pr49220.c: New test.
---
On 7 November 2012 10:25, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 11/07/2012 10:18 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 6 November 2012 19:41, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 6 November 2012 18:21, Paolo Carlini wrote:
testsuite/20_util/scoped_allocator/1.cc:79: void test02():
Assertion
On 10/23/2012 07:55 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK.
Unfortunately the patch as-is seems at least incomplete, thus to be sure
I reverted it for now and re-opened the PR: trying to actually use the
type showed issues in the gimplifier, see below. If you have hints about
that I would be glad to
Hello,
This tiny patch fixes the issue previously discussed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00794.html
Not maintaining bb-count while merging basic blocs results in wrong
partitioning (and surely other) decisions. This is visible on the SH4
with shrink-wrapping. I haven't noticed
Hello,
This tiny patch fixes the issue previously discussed in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-09/msg00794.html
Not maintaining bb-count while merging basic blocs results in wrong
partitioning (and surely other) decisions. This is visible on the SH4
with shrink-wrapping. I haven't
There are four in-tree target architectures that already use %|. I think
it would be better if you made these new escapes target-specific.
Escaped curly braces cannot be target-specific since
do_assembler_dialects() in final.c ignores any % and considers '{' and
'}' to be alternative
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 9:04 AM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
Or I wonder why is call handled specially at all, doesn't
/* Check if a 256bit AVX register is referenced in stores. */
state = unused;
note_stores (pat, check_avx256_stores, state);
if (state == used)
return
Hello!
Attached patch addresses UNRESOLVED part of cunroll-1.c test failure,
but with fixed dump filename, I got:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-1.c scan-tree-dump cunrolli Unrolled
loop 1 completely .duplicated 1 times..
I'll leave this to Honza to decide.
Uros.
Index:
OK,
is bb1 going to die? If not, probably bb1-count = 0 should be there, if so,
then the bb1-frequency = 0 is redundant.
Agree, we do 'delete_basic_block (bb1)' and the frequency is not used in
between, so the setting to 0 seems unnecessary.
testing it:
Index: tree-ssa-tail-merge.c
Hi!
The first (C++) testcase is rejected since my SIZEOF_EXPR folding deferral
changes, the problem is that
-1 + (int) (sizeof (int) - 1)
is first changed into
-1 + (int) ((unsigned) sizeof (int) + UINT_MAX)
and then fold_binary_loc reassociates it in int type into
(int) sizeof (int) +
Gerald Pfeifer ger...@pfeifer.com writes:
Just a small note, in the following
+#ifdef __FreeBSD__
+# define DEFAULT_PROCESS_FILENAME /proc/curproc/file
+#elif defined(HAVE_GETEXECNAME)
+# define DEFAULT_PROCESS_FILENAME getexecname ()
+#else
+# define DEFAULT_PROCESS_FILENAME
AIX has the exact same problem. Thanks for tracking down the solution
on Darwin. I applied the equivalent testsuite option for AIX.
Thanks, David
* testsuite/libgomp.c++/pr24455.C: Use -Wl,-G on AIX.
--- a/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.c++/pr24455.C 2012-06-18
17:57:13.0 -0400
OK,
is bb1 going to die? If not, probably bb1-count = 0 should be there, if
so,
then the bb1-frequency = 0 is redundant.
Agree, we do 'delete_basic_block (bb1)' and the frequency is not used in
between, so the setting to 0 seems unnecessary.
testing it:
Index:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:35:30PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:58:07AM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
2012-11-05 Martin Jambor mjam...@suse.cz
PR tree-optimization/53787
* ipa-cp.c (ipcp_value_source): New field offset.
...
Is this supposed to do
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 03:39:15PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
another bootstrap finishes. I'm not sure if it would be OK to commit
it now, given it is stage3, though. OTOH, I think it would be worth
it.
I'm ok with getting that in now from RM POV, but not familiar with the
code enough to
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 03:39:15PM +0100, Martin Jambor wrote:
another bootstrap finishes. I'm not sure if it would be OK to commit
it now, given it is stage3, though. OTOH, I think it would be worth
it.
I'm ok with getting that in now from RM POV, but not familiar with the
code
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Xinliang David Li davi...@google.com wrote:
As asan/tsan functionality is getting into trunk, we need to set up
testings as soon as possible to avoid bitrot.
Kostya can probably shed some lights on the test case requirements,
and we can continue discussions on
Hello,
Thanyou for investigation and fixing the problem. I'll answer on remarks later.
Regards,
Vladimir
2012/11/7 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 02:11:50PM -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:30 AM, Kirill Yukhin kirill.yuk...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hello,
On 11/06/2012 05:20 PM, 3dw...@verizon.net wrote:
So how about
-f[no-]ext-numeric-literals
Sure.
I think the ideal behavior for these suffixes would be to treat them as
user-defined literals if a corresponding literal operator is available,
or use the built-in extension if not. But that
On Wed, Nov 07, 2012 at 10:22:57AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
I thought about that. We'd need some machinery that would allow cpp to
query what has been declared already.
Or alternately, always treat them as user-defined in C++ mode and
have the front end decide to use the built-in
ok for google branches.
David
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:17 PM, Harshit Chopra hars...@google.com wrote:
Yes, will do, but probably not so soon. Once I have some spare time to
prepare my case for this being useful to public.
Meanwhile, this patch is just for google-main and then I will port it
On 2012-11-07 00:51, Naveen H. S wrote:
+ [(set (match_operand:QI 0 rx_restricted_mem_operand =Q)
+ (ior:QI (match_dup 0)
The output constraint is now an in-out: s/=Q/+Q/.
r~
See some random comments below. Some test cases should also be added.
It should be easy to fake the attack by using placement new with
incompatible type ..
David
/* Start the process of running a particular set of global constructors
or destructors. Subroutine of do_[cd]tors. */
Hello!
Apparently, vzeroupper patch removed a couple of unrelated lines.
Attached patch puts back what was there in gcc-4.5.
(Also, the patch finds a better place for check_avx256_stores.)
2012-11-07 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/55224
* config/i386/i386.c
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 10:35 -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
* doc/invoke.texi (-mcpu=power8): Document.
* config.in (HAVE_AS_POWER8): New.
* config.gcc: Add cpu_type power8.
* configure.ac: (HAVE_AS_POWER8): Check for assembler support for
the
When I patched Aldy's code to perform the update_ssa explicitly,
I forgot to take out the TODO_update_ssa that Aldy had added.
Tested on x86_64-linux and committed.
r~
* trans-mem.c (pass_ipa_tm): Don't use TODO_update_ssa.
diff --git a/gcc/trans-mem.c b/gcc/trans-mem.c
index
On Wed, 7 Nov 2012, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
Sure. What about something like this?
Index: htdocs/index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving revision 1.865
diff -u -r1.865 index.html
---
Ping ^ 4.
On 10/29/2012 10:46 AM, Meador Inge wrote:
Ping ^ 3.
On 10/18/2012 10:30 AM, Meador Inge wrote:
Ping ^ 2.
On 10/09/2012 09:44 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
Ping.
On 10/04/2012 03:45 PM, Meador Inge wrote:
Hi All,
Currently the gcc-{ar,nm,ranlib} utilities assume that binutils is
Here is the patch to fix the redundant rehash/reserve issue.
2012-11-07 François Dumont fdum...@gcc.gnu.org
PR libstdc++/54075
* include/bits/hashtable.h (_Hashtable::rehash): Reset hash
policy state if no rehash.
* testsuite/23_containers/unordered_set/modifiers/reserve.cc
The following patch fixes
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55122
The problem was in generation of reload pseudo for matching operands
with uniq value which prevented to assign the same hard register for the
reload pseudo and the original input pseudo when the choice of hard
The following patch adds omitted target for the test. The test was
supposed to run on x86-64 only. On 32-bit x86, it should fail. Reload
fails on this test on x86 too although with an error message. I am
going to add a generation of a message too.
Committed as rev. 193311.
2012-11-07
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
The following patch adds omitted target for the test. The test was
supposed to run on x86-64 only. On 32-bit x86, it should fail. Reload
fails on this test on x86 too although with an error message. I am going to
(fold_binary_op_with_conditional_arg): Do not fold if
the argument is itself a conditional expression.
2012-11-07 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
* gcc.c-torture/compile/20121107-1.c: New test.
--
Eric BotcazouIndex: fold-const.c
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:08 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
The patch simply removes the call to emit_block_move, while still
calling copy_blkmode_from_reg when appropriate. The patch fixes the
testsuite failure and produces the same code as gcc-4.7.
2012-11-07 Uros Bizjak
Vlad, I wanted to make you aware of the following because it's
a major barrier for using LRA on sparc at this time. I therefore
do not think moving to LRA on this target is possible in the 4.8
timeframe, which is fine. The situation is described completely
in the comment I am adding in the
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 1:40 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
Attached patch addresses UNRESOLVED part of cunroll-1.c test failure,
but with fixed dump filename, I got:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/cunroll-1.c scan-tree-dump cunrolli Unrolled
loop 1 completely .duplicated 1 times..
Now
On 12-11-07 5:27 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 2:21 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
The following patch adds omitted target for the test. The test was
supposed to run on x86-64 only. On 32-bit x86, it should fail. Reload
fails on this test on x86 too although
I wrote the second of these patches first, and I'm uncertain about the
desirability of the first of the patches.
While working on the uninstrumented code path bulk patch, I noticed that
nested transactions within the copy of the outermost transaction were
not being processed for an uninstrumented
On 11/07/2012 03:01 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
Thoughts?
Now with 100% more patches per mail!
r~
From 6e97eb1f7086b4392545cc73254037cd3ff09fe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2012 14:32:21 -0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] tm: Handle nested
On 12-11-07 5:39 PM, David Miller wrote:
Vlad, I wanted to make you aware of the following because it's
a major barrier for using LRA on sparc at this time. I therefore
do not think moving to LRA on this target is possible in the 4.8
timeframe, which is fine. The situation is described
Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com writes:
Is it ever likely that we'd choose an uninstrumented path for a
nested transaction, given that we're already executing the instrumented
path for an outer transaction?
I don't see why not. A small inner transaction may well succeed
in HTM, even if the
I noticed that because my new mips-mti-elf target includes config/mt-sde
it uses the -Os option by default when building runtime libraries. I would
like to remove the use of -Os so that the runtime performance for the
mips-mti-elf target is improved. If users want the -Os flag they can use
the
Quoting Joern Rennecke joern.renne...@embecosm.com:
+ varying_length[uid] = (varying_length[inner_uid] 1);
Typo; I meant:
+ varying_length[uid] |= (varying_length[inner_uid] 1);
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:39 PM, David Miller wrote:
One idea that occurred to me was perhaps to extend
define_register_constraint such that an extra condition can be
specified. So for sparc's constraint U it would evaluate to
GENERAL_REGS but also express the condition that the hard register
On 7 November 2012 22:02, François Dumont wrote:
Ok to commit ? If so, where ?
That patch is OK for trunk and 4.7, thanks.
On 7 November 2012 10:55, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 7 November 2012 10:25, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I'm for example seeing in the log:
23_containers/list/init-list.cc execution test
pretty mysterious,
Yes, I had a quick look at it but couldn't see the problem, so wanted
to fix the
[...]
Please help to review this new Multilib feature. It intends to
provide
user
Your patch doesn't include documentation for fragments.texi (which
needs to define the semantics without reference to the details of what
gcc.c's internal datastructures for multilibs, as output by
On 11/08/2012 02:37 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Bah, it's nothing to do with me, the profile-mode list should never
have worked! I'm testing this overnight.
Ah! Thanks!
Paolo.
From: Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2012 01:19:11 +0100
On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 11:39 PM, David Miller wrote:
One idea that occurred to me was perhaps to extend
define_register_constraint such that an extra condition can be
specified. So for sparc's constraint U it
I tested changes with configure
../gcc/configure --enable-clocale=gnu --with-system-zlib
--enable-shared --with-demangler-in-ld --with-fpmath=sse
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,java,lto,objc --with-arch=corei7-avx
--with-cpu=corei7-avx
Bootstrap is passed and no new fails in make check.
Thank
Hi,
Thank you for reviewing the patch and valuable comments.
The output constraint is now an in-out: s/=Q/+Q/.
Done.
Please find attached the modified patch and let me know if it's okay?
Thanks Regards,
Naveen
rx_bit_insn.patch
Description: rx_bit_insn.patch
Steve Ellcey sell...@mips.com writes:
I noticed that because my new mips-mti-elf target includes config/mt-sde
it uses the -Os option by default when building runtime libraries. I would
like to remove the use of -Os so that the runtime performance for the
mips-mti-elf target is improved. If
69 matches
Mail list logo
