Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com writes:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I noticed for_each_rtx showing up in profiles and thought I'd have a go
at using worklist-based iterators instead. So far I have three:
FOR_EACH_SUBRTX: iterates over const_rtx
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com writes:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I noticed for_each_rtx showing up in profiles and thought I'd have a go
at using worklist-based iterators instead. So far I
2014-05-07 8:55 GMT+02:00 Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com:
We only quote arguments that contain spaces, \t or
characters to prevent wasting 2 characters per
argument of the CreateProcess() 32,768 limit.
libiberty/
* pex-win32.c (argv_to_cmdline): Don't quote
args
Ah, that was my mail-client.
Patch is ok IMO. I add Ian CC for a second look at it.
Cheers,
Kai
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
This PR was due to code in which -(int) foo was suposed to be sign-extended,
but was being ORed with an unsigned int and so ended up being zero-extended.
Fixed by using the proper-width type.
As Kostya rightly said in the PR, this should
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
This PR was due to code in which -(int) foo was suposed to be sign-extended,
but was being ORed with an unsigned int and so ended up being zero-extended.
Hi,
Similar issue was discussed in thread
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg01145.html. The patches
are close to Jeff's suggestion: sink just the moves out of the
incoming argument registers.
The patch and following one try to shrink wrap a function with a
single loop, which can not
Hi,
The patch splits the live_edge for move_insn_for_shrink_wrap to sink
the copy out of the entry block.
Bootstrap and no make check regression on X86-64 and ARM.
OK for trunk?
Thanks!
-Zhenqiang
ChangeLog:
2014-05-08 Zhenqiang Chen zhenqiang.c...@linaro.org
* function.c
On Mon, 2014-05-05 14:05:40 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
I'd like to install this patch, which would help me to run the build
robot (http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/):
2014-05-05 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de
contrib/
* config-list.mk (show): New
2014-05-06 19:09 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law l...@redhat.com:
On 05/06/14 07:31, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com
wrote:
2014-04-16 15:00 GMT+04:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Hi,
This patch restarts the series for introducing
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Zhenqiang Chen wrote:
The patch splits the live_edge for move_insn_for_shrink_wrap to sink
the copy out of the entry block.
Maybe also time to take the shrink-wrapping code out of function.c and
put it in its own file?
Ciao!
Steven
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 6:44 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Bin.Cheng amker.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 6:19 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I split the patch into two and updated the test case.
Hi!
On Tue, 17 Dec 2013 15:39:57 +0400, Michael V. Zolotukhin
michael.v.zolotuk...@gmail.com wrote:
in this patch we
start to pass '__OPENMP_TARGET__' symbol to GOMP_target calls.
--- a/gcc/omp-low.c
+++ b/gcc/omp-low.c
@@ -8371,19 +8372,22 @@ expand_omp_target (struct omp_region *region)
On 05/06/2014 05:32 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On 05 Apr 17:22, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Things seemed to work over here, but now I'm not certain whether the
__start_/__stop_ functionality is GNU ld specific? Maybe we should
just go back to the previous version of this patch which didn't try
to use
This removes special-casing of pointer conversion handling in
gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1 - this was from times where
most pointer conversions were not useless (only conversions
to function/method pointers from other kinds are considered
not useless - which I'll change with a followup).
When gimplifying a call we now remember the original function type
used and record it in gimple_call_fntype. But we fail to use
exactly that type for looking at TYPE_ARG_TYPES. The following
fixes that.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2014-05-08
The following gets rid of SCCVNs valueize_expr which was used on
GENERIC expressions built via vn_get_expr_for which is used
for stmt combining via fold (yeah, I know ...). The odd way
was that it first folded and built the expression and then
valueized it (and not folding again), resulting in
Hi,
some time ago I worked a bit on this very old diagnostic enhancement issue:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-08/msg01588.html
and yesterday we got a duplicate. Adding an inform to
convert_for_assignment still makes sense to me, thus I resurrected the
patch, tightened a bit the
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 07:25:50AM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Trevor Saunders tsaund...@mozilla.com writes:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 09:52:49PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I noticed for_each_rtx showing up in profiles and thought I'd have a go
at using worklist-based iterators
... Manuel suggested to also use DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION, while we are at
it. Thus I'm retesting the below.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
Index: cp/typeck.c
===
--- cp/typeck.c (revision 210205)
+++ cp/typeck.c (working copy)
@@
Ok, not really predicate aware, but this makes value-numbering
pessimistically handle non-executable edges. In the following
patch groundwork is laid and PHI value-numbering is adjusted
to take advantage of edges known to be not executable.
SCCVN is not well-suited to be control aware, but we
Dear Tobias,
OK for trunk with one slight quibble:
I would rather see
+ /* Generate the function call. */
+ if (code-resolved_isym-id == GFC_ISYM_CO_MAX)
+fndecl = gfor_fndecl_co_max;
+ else if (code-resolved_isym-id == GFC_ISYM_CO_MIN)
+fndecl = gfor_fndecl_co_min;
+ else if
As reported in the PR, libgcc fails to build on Solaris with
--disable-shared: the creation of libgcc-unwind.map depends on
libgcc-std.ver which isn't built in this case.
Fixed as follows, tested by verifying that a --disable-shared
i386-pc-solaris2.10 build gets into stage2 without trying to
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Richard Sandiford rdsandif...@googlemail.com writes:
This patch handles multiplications using a single HWIxHWI-2HWI
multiplication
on hosts that have one. This removes all uses of the slow (half-HWI) path
Dear Tobias,
This one is fine for trunk.
Thanks for the patch.
Paul
Some instructions like INC, DEC, NEG currently set cc0 to set_zn which is not
the whole story because they also set the V flag. This leads to a wrong branch
instruction in the remainder as cc0 is used. Fix is to do same as clobber cc0.
For the matter of clarity, I added a new cc0 alternative
Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana@googlemail.com writes:
diff --git a/gcc/ChangeLog b/gcc/ChangeLog
index 354cdb9..8ef9a0f 100644
--- a/gcc/ChangeLog
+++ b/gcc/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2014-05-08 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com
+
+ * wide-int.cc (UTItype): Define.
On 3 May 2014 08:11, John Marino wrote:
On 5/2/2014 22:15, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 2 May 2014, John Marino wrote:
1) I don't know which type definitions are missing (iow, the important
ones from sys/type.h that are required to build gcc)
The default presumption should be:
*
Ping? I understand there was a freeze period for a while, but the patch
has been out for a little over 3 months, now, and is fairly trivial.
Can someone review it for me?
Suggest also including it in 4.9.
Thank you!
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 10:50:46PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/19/2013
On 05/08/14 07:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Ian's approved the libiberty.h change, Joseph's approved the stddef.h
change, I've approved the libstdc++ parts.
IIUC it still needs explicit approval for the rest, e.g. trivial
adjustments to configuration stuff in libitm and libcilkrts. Are there
On 5/8/2014 15:32, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/08/14 07:14, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Anyone willing to give it an overall approval?
I'll take a look at the rest. I mostly wanted someone else to deal with
stddef.h :-)
Thanks Jeff!
I'm am very appreciative of that.
John
On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
On powerpc64, to set a large loop count we have code like the
following after split1:
(insn 67 14 68 4 (set (reg:DI 160)
(const_int 99942400 [0x5f5])) /home/amodra/unaligned_load.c:14 -1
(nil))
(insn 68 67
OK.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Alan Modra [mailto:amo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 11:52 AM
To: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; dje@gmail.com; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797
Subject: Re: [Patch, PR 60158] Generate .fixup sections for
.data.rel.ro.local
Hi Mike,
How about GET_MODE_SIZE (STACK_SAVEAREA_MODE (SAVE_NONLOCAL)) / GET_MODE_SIZE
(Pmode) + 2 + /* slop for mips, see builtin_setjmp_setup */ 1 - 1. This
retains the slop for mips, and fixes ports like ia64 and s390 (see
STACK_SAVEAREA_MODE on those ports, it is larger one might
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01651.html
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
the previous patch had to be reverted as it broke the strange handling of
vectors in the ARM target. This new patch should be much more conservative
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2014 9:01 PM
To: Herman, Andrei
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; herman_and...@mentor.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH GCC]Add 'force-dwarf-lexical-blocks' command line
option
On Wed, 7 May 2014,
Hello!
Wide-int merge triggered following ICE:
In file included from ../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/wide-int.cc:37:0:
../../gcc-svn/trunk/gcc/wide-int.cc: In function ‘unsigned int
wi::mul_internal(long int*, const long int*, unsigned int, const long
int*, unsigned int, unsigned int, signop, bool*,
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
Having fixed TARGET_SSE_PACKED_SINGLE_INSN_OPTIMAL to apply only to
128-bit vectors, some --with-arch=bdver3 --with-cpu=bdver3
scan-assembler failures relating to that tuning remain, because of
different choices of
Rohit,
The subject line and thread may confuse people that this is a
PowerPC-specific issue. You need approval from a reviewer with
authority over varasm.c.
Thanks, David
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com
rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message-
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Wei Mi w...@google.com wrote:
The calls added in the templates of tls_local_dynamic_base_32 and
tls_global_dynamic_32 in pr58066-3.patch are used to prevent sched2
from moving sp setting across implicit tls calls, but those calls make
the combine of
Sorry, the subject should say _Atomic instead of _Alignas.
Marek
On May 8, 2014, at 7:24 AM, Nicholas Clifton ni...@redhat.com wrote:
What do you think of this version ?
Now we just need a __builtin_setjmp style of maintainer to review…
Ping~
Originally posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00019.html
Thanks,
Yufeng
On 05/01/14 17:57, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
Hi,
This patch documents issues with singleton vector types in the 4.9
AArch64 backend.
On AArch64, the singleton vector types int64x1_t, uint64x1_t
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
DATE Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com
* wide-int.cc (UTItype): Define.
(UDWtype): Define for appropriate W_TYPE_SIZE.
This breaks builds for 32-bit hosts, where TImode isn't supported. You
can only use TImode
On 25 April 2014 16:31, Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 4:29 PM, Charles Baylis
charles.bay...@linaro.org wrote:
OK to backport to 4.8 and 4.7?
Ok by me but give 24 working hours for an RM to object.
Committed to 4.7 as r210227.
Committed to 4.8
This patch isn't very useful on its own, but fixes the PR and should
be useful when adding move operations to the derived streambufs.
The mem-initializer for basic_streambuf::_M_out_end was initialized
from __sb._M_out_cur, which I assume was not intentional. Those
initializers were only added
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Andrew Bennett wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds support for MIPS r3 and r5 to GCC. I have updated the msgid
strings in the .po files for the error message I changed. Can I assume the
actual msgstr entries will be updated later on?
Never modify .po files in GCC; they should
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Herman, Andrei wrote:
The changes in gcc/c/c-decl.c are meant to deal with this problem.
Declarations
that would fall into the scope of a newly created label scope are moved into
the
enclosing normal (non label) scope, where they actually belong.
Shouldn't you be
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
Joseph pointed out that we don't warn when the return type of
main or the parameter type of main have the _Atomic qualifier.
This patch adds such warning.
Regtested/bootstrapped on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
OK.
--
Joseph S. Myers
Hi,
It currently takes 4 instructions to generate certain immediates on
AArch64 (unless we put them in the constant pool).
For example ...
long long
beefcafebabe ()
{
return 0xBEEFCAFEBABEll;
}
leads to ...
mov x0, 0x47806
mov x0, 0xcafe, lsl 16
mov x0, 0xbeef, lsl
This patch fixes a defective macro definition, based on correct
definition in similar testcases. The test currently passes
through luck rather than correctness.
OK for commit?
Cheers,
Ian
2014-05-08 Ian Bolton ian.bol...@arm.com
gcc/testsuite
* gcc.target/aarch64/vdup_lane_2.c
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Myers [mailto:jos...@codesourcery.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 08, 2014 8:27 PM
To: Herman, Andrei
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: [PATCH GCC]Add 'force-dwarf-lexical-blocks' command line
option
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Herman, Andrei wrote:
On Wed, May 07, 2014 at 11:31:38AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
OK, though I'm not sure if the lp64 conditions are right in the testcase
It should be !ia32 instead of lp64.
Ok, I changed lp64 to ! { ia32 } and committed the patch now.
Marek
Add static assertions to enforce requirements on the traits used with
basic_filebuf, improving the diagnostics for invalid traits.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 78df7e78e805c873883e63d9df4e6befa32ddac5
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Thu May 8 18:20:37 2014
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
DATE Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com
* wide-int.cc (UTItype): Define.
(UDWtype): Define for appropriate W_TYPE_SIZE.
This breaks builds for 32-bit hosts, where
Ping.
On Fri, May 02, 2014 at 11:28:54AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 11:20:25PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
diff --git gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attributes-1.c
gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/attributes-1.c
index
everyone who has a private port will hate you forever. note that i
have 2 of them.
On 05/08/2014 02:31 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Joseph S. Myers jos...@codesourcery.com writes:
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
DATE Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com
Attempting to repeatedly compile in-process led to assertion failures in
a release build on the 2nd compile within a process:
156 void
157 set_default_param_value (compiler_param num, int value)
158 {
159 gcc_assert (!params_finished);
160
161 compiler_params[(int)
Hello!
Apparently, not all Haswell processors have TSX. Attached patch
removes PTA_RTM from default Haswell flags. PTA_HLX still makes sense
for Haswell processors, since the prefix is ignored on non-TSX
processors.
2014-05-08 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/59952
*
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
everyone who has a private port will hate you forever. note that i
have 2 of them.
Got any other ideas though? I suppose if we're prepared to break
compatibility with whatever the upstream of longlong.h is, we could
make more use of intN_t and
Andrew Bennett andrew.benn...@imgtec.com writes:
diff --git a/gcc/config/mips/mips-cpus.def b/gcc/config/mips/mips-cpus.def
index 07fbf9c..f2e23c6 100644
--- a/gcc/config/mips/mips-cpus.def
+++ b/gcc/config/mips/mips-cpus.def
@@ -44,9 +44,13 @@ MIPS_CPU (mips4, PROCESSOR_R8000, 4, 0)
On 05/08/14 02:17, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Right. Richi explicitly wanted the entire set approved before staging in
any of the bits.
I thought it would be useful to have approved codes in the trunk to
reveal some possible problems on earlier stages. It also requires
significant effort to keep
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
everyone who has a private port will hate you forever. note that i
have 2 of them.
Got any other ideas though? I suppose if we're prepared to break
Update an old URL and an old pathname.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to 4.8, 4.9 and trunk.
commit 4692e5802722954c4dda17e8b7f4ed4b78bcc272
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Thu May 8 19:38:42 2014 +0100
* include/std/iostream: Fix URL in comment.
*
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:34:28PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
everyone who has a private port will hate you forever. note that i
have 2 of them.
Got any
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:28 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/08/14 02:17, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Right. Richi explicitly wanted the entire set approved before staging in
any of the bits.
I thought it would be useful to have approved codes in the trunk to
reveal some possible
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:34:28PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com writes:
everyone who has a private
Committed to 4.8, 4.9 and trunk.
On 08/05/14 20:52 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Committed to 4.8, 4.9 and trunk.
And 4.7 since that branch is still open too.
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:34:28PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
Kenneth Zadeck zad...@naturalbridge.com
Hi,
This patch fixed lipo ICE triggered by an out-of-bound access.
This is google specific patch and tested with bootstrap and the
program exposed the issue.
Thanks,
-Rong
2014-05-08 Rong Xu x...@google.com
* tree-inline.c (add_local_variables): Check if the debug_expr
is a
ok.
David
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Rong Xu x...@google.com wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixed lipo ICE triggered by an out-of-bound access.
This is google specific patch and tested with bootstrap and the
program exposed the issue.
Thanks,
-Rong
Hi all,
I have now merged the trunk into the branch. The main change is the new
co_min/max/sum feature but also a patch which has reduced the
differences between the trunk and the branch. - And of course, all the
other trunk changes such as the wide-int patch.
Committed as Rev. 210244.
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:34:28PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:18 PM, Richard
Ping.
previous post: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01938.html
Again bootstrapped/regtested/diffed against
xg++ (GCC) 4.10.0 20140508 (experimental) [master revision
ed50168:49aa3a5:e79f58c7b12f37014efb7425399c93814cddb4c4]
On 29.04.2014 12:58, Momchil Velikov wrote:
Hello,
gcc
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Herman, Andrei wrote:
Declarations that would fall into the scope of a newly created label
scope are moved into the enclosing normal (non label) scope, where
they actually belong.
Shouldn't you be able to do something like that for the other cases as well,
to
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 1:12 PM, Richard Sandiford
rdsandif...@googlemail.com wrote:
H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com writes:
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 12:34:28PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu,
On Fri, 2 May 2014, Marek Polacek wrote:
Yeah, that was a weird thing to do. I yanked that particular test to
a new testcase. Otherwise no changes.
Tested again x86_64-linux, ok now?
2014-05-02 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
PR c/50459
c-family/
* c-common.c
This fixes a regression introduced with 4.8, where the option ordering of
-Wextra and -Wunused-parameter emits a warning, which is not emitted with 4.7.
No regressions with the trunk, the 4.9 and 4.8 branches. Ok to check in for
these?
Matthias
2014-05-08 Manuel LC3B3pez-IbC3A1C3B1ez
On Thu, 8 May 2014, Matthias Klose wrote:
This fixes a regression introduced with 4.8, where the option ordering
of -Wextra and -Wunused-parameter emits a warning, which is not emitted
with 4.7. No regressions with the trunk, the 4.9 and 4.8 branches. Ok to
check in for these?
OK.
--
Nit: normally, ChangeLog entries are not submitted as diffs, part of the
patch proper, but separately (also because the ChangeLog files keep
changing quite fast).
Paolo.
[...]
Just found this for iq2000:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings
-Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute -Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic
-Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
On Fri, 2014-05-09 at 00:48 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
[...]
Just found this for iq2000:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wmissing-format-attribute
On Fri, 2014-05-09 00:48:39 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
Just found this for iq2000:
g++ -c -g -O2 -DIN_GCC -DCROSS_DIRECTORY_STRUCTURE -fno-exceptions
-fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall -Wno-narrowing
-Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual
The libstdc++v3 headers have __int128 hard-coded all over the place.
Any suggestions on parameterizing those for the __intN types that are
actually supported by the target?
On Thu, 8 May 2014, DJ Delorie wrote:
The libstdc++v3 headers have __int128 hard-coded all over the place.
Any suggestions on parameterizing those for the __intN types that are
actually supported by the target?
(adding libstdc++@ in Cc:)
The first idea that comes to mind (so possibly not
Assuming that the formula sizeof(type)*char_bit==precision works for all
It doesn't. THe MSP430 has __int20 for example.
Would it be acceptable for the compiler to always define a set of
macros for each of the intN types? I would have thought that would be
discouraged, but it would be an
On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 09:48:35AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
The history is 32 bit HWI.
Right.
The ChangeLog does not mention the changes to rs6000.md nor rs6000-protos.h.
Oops, added.
* config/rs6000/rs6000.md (movsi_internal1_single+1): Update
call to
This was yet another problem issue with threading through a loop
backedge and finding equivalences that should have been invalidated.
In this instance, we were trying to thread through a large block. When
we hit the statement threshold, thread_through_normal_block returned and
thus
While testing on a large Google binary, I noticed that libbacktrace is
allocating an inordinate amount of memory. The binary winds up with
377,944 entries in the unit_addrs vector. Each entry is 24 bytes, so
this is 9,070,656 bytes, which is not too terrible. Unfortunately, for
some reason I
On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 11:56 PM, Ray Donnelly mingw.andr...@gmail.com wrote:
We only quote arguments that contain spaces, \t or
characters to prevent wasting 2 characters per
argument of the CreateProcess() 32,768 limit.
This is OK.
Thanks.
Ian
libiberty/pex-win32.c | 46
On 05/03/14 01:11, John Marino wrote:
revised patchset :
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/gcc-df-target/patches/patch-dragonfly-target
revised changelog :
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~marino/gcc-df-target/changelog_entries/gcc_ChangeLog_entry.txt
revised commit msg:
On 05/08/14 02:10, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
On Mon, 2014-05-05 14:05:40 +0200, Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de wrote:
I'd like to install this patch, which would help me to run the build
robot (http://toolchain.lug-owl.de/buildbot/):
2014-05-05 Jan-Benedict Glaw jbg...@lug-owl.de
Hi!
In r210257, I have committed a merge from trunk r210100 (2014-05-06) into
gomp-4_0-branch.
The LTO regression that appeared with the last merge,
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C87wqf483pl.fsf%40schwinge.name%3E,
remains to be resolved:
PASS: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps
I merged GCC 4.9 branch revision 210256 to the gccgo branch.
Ian
96 matches
Mail list logo
