Hello!
Test O2 ref patchedOfast + LTO ref patched
164.gzip12 0 (-100%)39 0 (-100%)
175.vpr 0 0 (-0%) 4 0 (-100%)
176.gcc 141 6 (-96%) 294 10 (-97%)
181.mcf 4 0
On 03/10/2015 01:03 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Good question, but we don't have this issue, because for that we emit
anyway:
65370.C:11:36: error: default argument specified in explicit
specialization [-fpermissive]
Cint::C(const CU, bool = false);
nothing changes about that kind of testcase,
On 05/02/15 11:28 +, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This patch simply remove the target selector. It should pass for all target
which applies.
The comment in the code is not correct. stderr is redirected, not the stdout.
Therefore, the return status which is streamed into stdout should properly
I'd like to backport the following patch that suppresses bogus ubsan errors.
I had to tweak the testcase a bit since 4.9 doesn't know -fno-sanitize-recover.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for 4.9?
2015-03-10 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
Backported from mainline
On 11/03/2015 02:11, 박준모 wrote:
Hi all,
This patch only affect sha2 crypto instruction's order when gcc
performs instruction scheduling(rtl-sched1,2).
There are no definition for crypto_sha256_fast, crypto_sha256_slow on
cortex-a57.md.
This makes poor result of instruction
current trunk fails to build on x86*-linux, when configured for x32 multilibs
because libmpx doesn't support these. Disable them.
ok for the trunk?
* Disable libmpx x32 multilib builds.
--- a/config-ml.in
+++ b/config-ml.in
@@ -102,6 +102,7 @@
Makefile=${ac_file-Makefile}
Hi Jakub,
with my OPC UA Server, I observe a reproducible crash in
ScopedReport::AddThread: tctx==NULL
in if ((u32)rep_-threads[i]-id == tctx-tid).
Apparently, Dmitry has already fixed that in the obvious way.
So we should cherry pick these two changes from LLVM: 224508 and 224755
See
Attached patch as text.
2015-03-11 Junmo Park junmoz.p...@samsung.com
* config/arm/cortex-a57.md (cortex_a57_crypto_simple): Add
crypto_sha256_fast.
(cortex_a57_crypto_complex): Add crypto_sha256_slow.
Ok to commit to trunk?
OK, Thanks Sebastian.
regards
On 03/11/15 08:44, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Mon, Mar 9, 2015 at 7:30 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
This bug was one I unfortunately introduced with the -mupper-regs support. If
the reload pass needed to reload a PLUS operation (for example, due to using
odd address
James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 04:24:07PM +, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
Attached patch as text.
2015-03-11 Junmo Park junmoz.p...@samsung.com
* config/arm/cortex-a57.md (cortex_a57_crypto_simple): Add
crypto_sha256_fast.
Hi,
Instrumented function pointer may be propagated into not instrumented indirect
call and vice versa. It requires additional call modifications (either remove
bounds or change callee). Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
Thanks,
Ilya
--
gcc/
2015-03-12
2015-03-12 12:02 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:51:51AM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 09 Mar 15:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:25:43PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
--- a/gcc/toplev.c
+++ b/gcc/toplev.c
@@ -1376,6 +1376,11
Hi,
This is a ping for: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00775.html
Regtested with aarch64-linux-gnu on QEMU.
This patch has no regressions for aarch64_be-linux-gnu big-endian target too.
OK for the trunk? Thanks.
Index: gcc/ChangeLog
On 09 Mar 15:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:25:43PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
--- a/gcc/toplev.c
+++ b/gcc/toplev.c
@@ -1376,6 +1376,11 @@ process_options (void)
{
if (targetm.chkp_bound_mode () == VOIDmode)
error
This just updates the status link on the homepage from the 4.9.2-rc1
announcement to the final release announcement a week later.
Committed to CVS.
Index: index.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/index.html,v
retrieving
Hi all
we have merged the gcc-4_9-branch into linaro/gcc-4_9-branch up to
revision 221341 as r221360. We have also backported this set of revisions:
* r212011 as r221216 : PR tree-optimization/61607
* r214942 as r221216 : Abstract away marking loops for removal
* r214957 as r221216 : Sanity
Hi,
We have a problem with declare target variables in fortran modules, here is a
small reproducer:
+ share.f90:
module share
integer :: var_x
!$omp declare target(var_x)
end module
+ test.f90:
use share
var_x = 10
!$omp target update to(var_x)
end
+
$ gfortran -fopenmp -c
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:56:35PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
This happens because the var_x is added into offload tables for both share.o
and
test.o. The patch below fixes this issue. Regtested on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux. However I'm not sure how to create a regression test, which
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
The patch fixes that by calculating the size of the first element by
taking the size of the outer mode and subtracting the size of the second
element.
I've added an assert to make sure that the second element is not
The patch fixes that by calculating the size of the first element by
taking the size of the outer mode and subtracting the size of the second
element.
I've added an assert to make sure that the second element is not also a
const_int, as a vec_concat of const_ints doesn't make sense as far
For P a subprogram, P'Code_Address is expected to return
the address at which the machine code for P starts.
It differs from 'Address on targets where function
symbol names denote the address of a function descriptor,
a record from which the code address can be fetched
(e.g. on ppc-aix).
On such
After noticing tree-parloop.c passing crap to split_block (a tree
rather than a gimple or an rtx) I noticed those CFG functions simply
take void * pointers. The following patch fixes that and adds
two overloads, one for GIMPLE use and one for RTL use.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
CFG cleanup currently searches for calls that became noreturn and
fixes them up (splitting block and removing the fallthru). Previously
that was technically necessary as propagation may have turned an
indirect call into a direct noreturn call and the CFG verifier would
have barfed.
Hi,
I have wrote a testcase that reproduces argument overwriting bug during arm
code generation.
I wrote this testcase with the help of Mikael Pettersson.
If some format is not proper to run in gcc testsuite framework, please
correct me.
Please refer to the following bugzilla link for details:
2015-03-09 Martin Liska marxin.li...@gmail.com
* config/i386/i386.c (def_builtin): Collect union of all
possible masks.
(ix86_add_new_builtins): Do not iterate over all builtins
in cases that isa value has no intersection with possible masks
and(or) last
The cgo tool installed by gccgo works fine on 32-bit PPC. This patch
notes that fact in the gccgo version of the go tool. This is GCC PR
65404. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
diff -r 81cc50c9140d libgo/go/go/build/build.go
---
On 03/12/2015 06:13 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
52718_red.C:1:22: warning: zero as null pointer constant
[-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant]
void* fun(void* a = 0);
52718_red.C:2:16: warning: zero as null pointer constant
[-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant]
void* f2 = fun();
OK, then your second
The PR shows that the compiler ICEs whenever it tries to expand an atomic
operation at the file scope. That happens because it creates temporaries
via create_tmp_var, which also pushes the variable into the current binding,
but that can't work if current_function_decl is NULL. The fix is I
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:00 AM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
On 03/12/2015 05:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The cgo tool installed by gccgo works fine on 32-bit PPC. This patch
notes that fact in the gccgo version of the go tool. This is GCC PR
65404. Bootstrapped and ran Go
This patch changes the gotools to add GOCFLAGS to the build command,
since the command is both compiling and linking. The main effect of
this is to, by default, build with -g -O2, which previously was not
happening. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Committed to
On 03/12/2015 05:41 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
The cgo tool installed by gccgo works fine on 32-bit PPC. This patch
notes that fact in the gccgo version of the go tool. This is GCC PR
65404. Bootstrapped and ran Go testsuite on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
same thing
Hello Paul,
have you had time to look at this again?
Mikael
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 08:52:54PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:02:06PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
I am concerned with the create_TOC_reference use for TARGET_TOC. Has
this
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 08:52:54PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 6:21 PM, Michael Meissner
meiss...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 01:02:06PM -0400, David Edelsohn
I assumed that Pthreads was enough to ensure pthread_rwlock_t but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64847 shows that isn't
true for HPUX (seems it was optional prior to POSIX 1003.1-2001).
This adds an autoconf check to decide whether to use pthread_rwlock_t
or the fallback
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 15:21:35 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:56:35PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
This happens because the var_x is added into offload tables for both
share.o and
test.o. The patch below fixes this issue. Regtested on x86_64-linux and
i686-linux.
Ping:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-02/msg00045.html
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:22:37PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 15:21:35 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 04:56:35PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
This happens because the var_x is added into offload tables for both
share.o and
test.o. The patch
This fixes sth noticed by Honza - I was resetting OEP_ADDRESS_OF
before actually testing for it in MEM_REF/TARGET_MEM_REF handling.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-03-12 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR middle-end/65270
*
On 03/04/2015 11:00 AM, Marat Zakirov wrote:
Hi all!
Here is the patch which forces ASan to work on memory access without
proper alignment. it's useful because some programs like linux kernel
often cheat with alignment which may cause false negatives. This patch
needs additional support
On 12-03-15 10:57, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Attached patch adds nonpic target requirement for some (obvious)
cases, where data access or PIC register setup confuses scan-asms.
2015-01-30 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
Hi,
Currently cgraph merge has several issues with instrumented code:
- original function node may be removed = no assembler name conflict is
detected between function and variable
- only orig_decl name is privatized for instrumented function = node still
shares assembler name which causes
Hi Guys,
The patch below updates the 20101011-1.c test in the gcc testsuite to
add a few more targets whose (simulated) runtime does not support
trapping on division by zero.
OK to apply ?
Cheers
Nick
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
2015-03-12 Nick Clifton ni...@redhat.com
*
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 9:11 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Attached patch adds nonpic target requirement for some (obvious)
cases, where data access or PIC register setup confuses scan-asms.
2015-01-30 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
*
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
Attached patch adds nonpic target requirement for some (obvious)
cases, where data access or PIC register setup confuses scan-asms.
2015-01-30 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
*
On 10 Mar 19:08, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
Test O2 ref patchedOfast + LTO ref patched
164.gzip12 0 (-100%)39 0 (-100%)
175.vpr 0 0 (-0%) 4 0 (-100%)
176.gcc 141 6 (-96%) 294
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com wrote:
Test O2 ref patchedOfast + LTO ref patched
164.gzip12 0 (-100%)39 0 (-100%)
175.vpr 0 0 (-0%) 4 0 (-100%)
176.gcc
On 30-01-15 20:49, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
Attached patch adds nonpic target requirement for some (obvious)
cases, where data access or PIC register setup confuses scan-asms.
2015-01-30 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save-rec.c: Require nonpic target.
Hi,
This patch fixes PR64895, related to the gcc.target/i386/fuse-caller-save*.c
failures for -m32 -fpic.
Bootstrapped and reg-tested on x86_64 for unix/ and unix/-m32.
Build and reg-tested on x86_64 for unix/fpic and unix/fpic/-m32.
Approved here (
There are two groups of features which are not properly implemented with
remote access:
* caf(:)[i]%a might have a byte stride which is not compatible with
the size of a. (Fix: new array descriptor.)
* All access which involves dereferencing pointers in a remote coarray
(e.g. caf[i]%ptr_comp
On 11 Mar 19:11, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2015-03-11 18:59 GMT+03:00 H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com:
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 7:37 AM, Matthias Klose d...@ubuntu.com wrote:
current trunk fails to build on x86*-linux, when configured for x32
multilibs
because libmpx doesn't support these. Disable
Hi,
On 03/11/2015 09:26 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 03/06/2015 03:36 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
this is a regression about duplicate warnings with
-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant. The regression is rather old, affects
4_8-branch too, and started when check_default_argument got a
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 09:53:38AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-12/msg01599.html
Why change the code from swapping the words at the initial
change_address() to swapping the words in the call to gen_bswapsi2()?
Sorry for dropping this on the floor for so
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
CFG cleanup currently searches for calls that became noreturn and
fixes them up (splitting block and removing the fallthru). Previously
that was technically necessary as propagation may have turned an
indirect call into a direct noreturn call and
Hi Jiangjiji,
This is definitely stage 1 material by now...
At my glance it all looks like the right approach, I have a question below:
On 12/03/15 09:20, Jiangjiji wrote:
+
+(define_insn aarch64_fmulx_lanemode
+ [(set (match_operand:VDQF 0 register_operand =w)
+(unspec:VDQF
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 10 Mar 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
This removes the old vestige loop to find a gsi for a stmt (from times
where gsi_for_stmt was O(n)).
PR44563 shows gimple_split_block quite high in the profile (this
patch doesn't fix that) as
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 11:51:51AM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
On 09 Mar 15:51, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Mon, Mar 02, 2015 at 01:25:43PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
--- a/gcc/toplev.c
+++ b/gcc/toplev.c
@@ -1376,6 +1376,11 @@ process_options (void)
{
if
This backports the fixes for PR target/64304 , miscompilation with
-mgeneral-regs-only, to the 4.8 4.9 branch from trunk r219844.
Tested on x86_64 by using qemu of aarch64.
OK for 4.8 4.9 ?
---gcc-4.8---
diff -rupN
On Mon, 16 Feb 2015, James Bowman wrote:
I have updated the target options. Space-saving is now enabled by
-Os. There is also a new option -msim to enable building for the
simulator (the simulator is pending submission to gdb-binutils).
The documentation in this patch doesn't seem to
59 matches
Mail list logo
