The attached patch adds support for the -rdynamic compiler flag
on darwin12 and later. The darwin linker, starting with Xcode 5 on
darwin12, added support for the associated new -export_dynamic linker
flag.
-export_dynamic
Preserves all global symbols in main
We have two desires for interaction of __builtin_constant_p with
constexpr: 1) it should be a constant-expression even if its operands
are not, and 2) we shouldn't fold it to false prematurely when parsing a
constexpr function (c++/54021). We were having trouble with both of
these, and this
Tested ppc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 8009da43b7be1a10335240b7b2f4e27250d5376f
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Mon Mar 30 19:22:52 2015 +0100
PR libstdc++/65631
* include/bits/random.h (seed_seq) Define copy constructor and copy
assignment as
On 04/28/2015 06:59 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
!DECL_FRIEND_PSEUDO_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (t)
the name
of the macro seems weird to me: it mentions friends (and friends are
mentioned in its comment too) but isn't used only for DECL_FRIEND_P true
and indeed it is true for the non-friend 'fn'
On 28/04/15 14:47 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch fixes an obvious typo. Regtested without problem, and I
manually checked that the new return value of max() makes more sense.
OK, thanks.
Tree if-conversion currently bails out for loops that (a) contain nested loops;
(b) have more than one exit; (c) where the exit block (source of the exit edge)
does not dominate the loop latch; (d) where the exit block is the loop header,
or there are statements after the exit.
This patch
Fix a simple case where we can generalise the CONST_INT handling to all
integer constants (CONST_DOUBLE or CONST_WIDE_INT).
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/
* loop-iv.c (canon_condition): Generalize to all types of integer
constant.
Index:
Hi Matthew,
2015-04-21 15:24 GMT+01:00 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com:
2015-04-21 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com
gcc/
* loop-invariant.c (find_defs): Enable DF_DU_CHAIN build.
(vfp_const_iv): New hash table.
(expensive_addr_check_p): New boolean.
Alan Lawrence wrote:
Tree if-conversion currently bails out for loops that (a) contain nested loops;
(b) have more than one exit; (c) where the exit block (source of the exit edge)
does not dominate the loop latch; (d) where the exit block is the loop header,
or there are statements after the
Mikhail Maltsev malts...@gmail.com writes:
I'm sending an updated patch (rebased to recent trunk, bootstrapped and
regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu).
On 04/25/2015 02:49 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
FWIW I think the split between label_rtx and live_label_rtx is good,
but I think we
On 04/28/2015 08:06 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
2015-04-24 20:25 GMT+02:00 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
So for warning folding, I think
the caching approach we were talking about in the call today is the way to
go.
Ok. Just a question about where to hook up the hash-variable. What
would be a
2015-04-28 14:56 GMT+01:00 Matthew Fortune matthew.fort...@imgtec.com:
Hi Matthew,
2015-04-21 15:24 GMT+01:00 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com:
2015-04-21 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com
gcc/
* loop-invariant.c (find_defs): Enable DF_DU_CHAIN build.
(vfp_const_iv): New hash table.
Only emitting the warnings with -Wodr looks good to me. I can't see
how we can decide what cases lead to wrong code surprises and what not
OK, I will go with -Wodr for all the warnings then, that seems fine to me.
(other than using types_compatible_p ...). Wrong-code can only(?) happen
On 28/04/15 09:32, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi,
On 27 April 2015 at 15:58, Yvan Roux yvan.r...@linaro.org wrote:
On 27 April 2015 at 15:20, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Yvan,
On 27/04/15 13:25, Yvan Roux wrote:
Hi,
This is a follow-up of PR64208 where an LRA loop was due to
On 04/23/2015 01:45 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
We try to strip attributes that aren't reflected in mangling from template
arguments, but were failing to do that in this case. Fixed by making
strip_typedefs strip such attributes as
This improves -Wbool-compare a bit: boolean = 0 is always true, on the other
hand boolean 0 is always false, and similar.
One feature/bug is that in C++ we don't warn for e.g. bool = false, since the
warning cares about bool CMP non-bool or non-bool CMP bool. I can fix
that in a follow-up if
Hi,
I'm having another look at this old bug, and I think it should be easy
to fix, but there are a few details which I do not understand.
Essentially the issue is about:
struct B
{
template typename T
void fn() { cout __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ endl; }
};
int main()
{
This is an updated implementation of the proposed
-Wmisleading-indentation warning.
Changes since last patch:
* I've rewritten it to use Manuel's approach from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-04/msg01225.html
I took Manuel's proposed patch for the C frontend and generalized
it to
This patch fixes the places in our tree where -Wmisleading-indentation
correctly identifies code that's misleadingly indented.
In particular, a couple of places in
gcc/cp/parser.c:cp_parser_asm_definition
appeared to be missing braces, both of the form:
if (complicated_multiline_condition
An earlier version of the -Wmisleading-indentation patch issued
warnings for spurious trailing semicolons guarded by a conditional.
Although the latest version of -Wmisleading-indentation no longer
warns about these, I fixed the ones that were reported, thusly.
gcc/ChangeLog:
*
On 04/27/2015 02:31 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
build_common_builtin_nodes declares both __builtin_alloca and
__builtin_alloca_with_align to have library name alloca. This actually
triggers warning in an updated ODR violation detector on alloca being
declared twice.
__builtin_alloca_with_align
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 2:19 AM, Renlin Li renlin...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to add another two ACLE 2.0 predefined macros into
aarch64 backend.
They are __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_PWR and __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_STACK_PWR. Currently, those
two values are hard-wired to 16.
The following
[This is actually for the debug-early branch, but I figured I'd avoid
the [debug-early] subject line to alert others of the upcoming change.
Actually, I should've adapted this and submitted it to mainline, but
considering I should be submitting the debug-early work Real Soon Now
(tm), I don't
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:10:33PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/26/2015 07:09 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
handle_section_attribute contains many levels of nested conditionals and
branching code flow paths, with the error cases sometimes in the else
case and sometimes in the if case. Simplify the
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
* On powerpc it seems the only configure option to choose the default
long-double abi is --with-long-double-128, but that's the default with
sufficiently new glibc. (musl gets 64bit long-double because the glibc
version check fails, this is ok,
On 04/28/2015 06:02 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
An earlier version of the -Wmisleading-indentation patch issued
warnings for spurious trailing semicolons guarded by a conditional.
Although the latest version of -Wmisleading-indentation no longer
warns about these, I fixed the ones that were
On 04/27/2015 02:09 PM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
I'm sending an updated patch (rebased to recent trunk, bootstrapped and
regtested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu).
[ ... ]
-- Regards, Mikhail Maltsev
as_insn2.patch
Needs a ChangeLog. I know it's a bit tedious... But please include it.
It
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
If you want to do anything about it, instead hack up the ABI list checker,
so that for configurations with disabled TLS it ignores TLS symbols in the
ABI list, then they can be added on all architectures.
Is anyone actually using current GCC for
On 04/27/2015 04:20 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I think it's been the case for a while that parallel builds of GCC tend
to serialise around the compilation of insn-recog.c, especially with
higher --enable-checking settings. This patch tries to speed that
up by replacing most of genrecog with a
Remove the bits of the checking code that have never found anything
useful in the last few months of work. Plus, they're timing out on big
test cases.
I'm removing them, as they were never meant to go into production.
Committed to branch.
Aldy
commit e6b1a0f8433ad2d72bd23d4d5def127431e22452
On 04/27/2015 02:31 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
build_common_builtin_nodes declares both __builtin_alloca and
__builtin_alloca_with_align to have library name alloca. This actually
triggers warning in an updated ODR violation detector on alloca being
declared twice.
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 17/04/15 16:42, Tom Tromey wrote:
Dave == David Malcolm dmalc...@redhat.com writes:
Dave However within libcpp and gcc, in linemap's expanded_location and in
Dave diagnostic messages, the column numbers are actually 1-based counts
.. nope, sorry, what I have doesn't work for eg:
for (class C {};;)
Paolo.
On 04/28/2015 01:15 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 10:07:46PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
Thanks for the nice summary in the first part of the mail. Two typos:
+ /* Most of the time tree_swap_operands_p does what we want. But there's
Shouldn't that be there are?
+
though.
+ if (((TREE_CODE (t) == ENUMERAL_TYPE COMPLETE_TYPE_P (t))
+ || TREE_CODE (t) == INTEGER_TYPE
+ || TREE_CODE (t) == BOOLEAN_TYPE
+ || TREE_CODE (t) == REAL_TYPE
+ || TREE_CODE (t) == FIXED_POINT_TYPE)
+ (TYPE_MAX_VALUE (t) != TYPE_MAX_VALUE (tv)
+ ||
Hello,
Le 28/04/2015 12:43, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
To get the testsuite accepting a dump-fortran-original, I had to insert a
dg-prune-output. Without the prune output, dejagnu was reporting excess
errors.
The prune removes all output after the first Namespace: that starts the
2015-04-24 20:25 GMT+02:00 Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com:
On 04/24/2015 09:46 AM, Kai Tietz wrote:
Sure, we can use here instead *_fully_fold, but for what costs? In
general we need to deal here a simple one-level fold for simplifying
constant-values, and/or removing useless
On 04/27/2015 06:08 PM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
OK to do the following instead? (Coding style/code copied from
gcc/config/i386/intelmic-mkoffload.c for consistency.)
Err, was this a question for me? I'm fine with that too.
Bernd
On 27/04/15 21:53 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 27/04/15 21:40 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Tested x86_64-linux and powerpc64le-linux. Committed to trunk.
The baseline_symbols changes aren't needed now and I tweaked the
gnu.ver file slightly.
Ville noticed a typo in a comment I added,
On 04/28/2015 02:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
[CCing gcc-patches]
On 28/04/15 14:32 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
broken on GCC 5 and trunk
Ouch.
OK for trunk and the branch, do you have commit privs?
No, I don't; would be great if you can push that.
On 27/04/15 15:44 -0700, Doug Evans wrote:
PR libstdc++/65839
* python/libstdcxx/v6/xmethods.py (get_bool_type): New function.
Replace all lookups of bool with this.
(get_std_size_type): New function. Replace all lookups of std::size_t
with this.
[CCing gcc-patches]
On 28/04/15 14:32 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
broken on GCC 5 and trunk
Ouch.
OK for trunk and the branch, do you have commit privs?
Index: libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
===
--- libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog
Hello,
this patch fixes an obvious typo. Regtested without problem, and I
manually checked that the new return value of max() makes more sense.
2015-04-28 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR libstdc++/65883
* include/std/limits (numeric_limits): Add missing unsigned.
--
Hi Matthew,
2015-04-21 15:24 GMT+01:00 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com:
2015-04-21 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com
gcc/
* loop-invariant.c (find_defs): Enable DF_DU_CHAIN build.
(vfp_const_iv): New hash table.
(expensive_addr_check_p): New boolean.
(init_inv_motion_data):
Define std::void_t for -std=c++17 and -std=gnu++11 (like Ville's
uncaught_exceptions() patch I think this is useful to define as an
extension pre-C++17, and the feature-test macro makes it easy for
users to test for the presence/absence of it in different modes).
Tested ppc64le-linux, committed
On 04/28/2015 08:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 04/28/2015 02:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/28/2015 06:59 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
!DECL_FRIEND_PSEUDO_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (t)
the name
of the macro seems weird to me: it mentions friends (and friends are
mentioned in its
Hi,
On 04/28/2015 02:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/28/2015 06:59 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
!DECL_FRIEND_PSEUDO_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (t)
the name
of the macro seems weird to me: it mentions friends (and friends are
mentioned in its comment too) but isn't used only for DECL_FRIEND_P
This isn't required, but we might as well add it for consistency with
std::list:splice and for extra noexceptiness.
Tested ppc64le-linux, committed to trunk.
commit 24308d6f00c2235fcc87ce0ab05e219696714699
Author: Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com
Date: Wed Apr 8 17:35:13 2015 +0100
PR
We were assuming that no enumeration would ever be bigger than long
and were also failing to preserve cv qualifiers on enums.
I fixed make_unsigned and then changed make_signed to reuse that
instead of duplicating all the logic.
Tested x86_64-linux (with -m32) and ppc64le-linux.
Committed to
On 28/04/15 14:43 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/28/2015 02:38 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
[CCing gcc-patches]
On 28/04/15 14:32 +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
broken on GCC 5 and trunk
Ouch.
OK for trunk and the branch, do you have commit privs?
No, I don't; would be great if you
On Mon, 20 Apr 2015, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
* config/linux.opt (mmusl): New option.
New -m options need documenting in invoke.texi.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On 04/28/2015 06:02 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
This patch fixes the places in our tree where -Wmisleading-indentation
correctly identifies code that's misleadingly indented.
In particular, a couple of places in
gcc/cp/parser.c:cp_parser_asm_definition
appeared to be missing braces, both of the
On 04/26/2015 07:09 PM, Josh Triplett wrote:
handle_section_attribute contains many levels of nested conditionals and
branching code flow paths, with the error cases sometimes in the else
case and sometimes in the if case. Simplify the code flow into a series
of potential failure cases ending
Hi,
This is a small patch where I moved a portion of code from the function
vectorize_loops outside to improve readability.
Please see the patch attached and give comments for improvements.
Thanks
-Aditya
refactor-vect
Description: Binary data
Ping~
Regards,
Renlin Li
On 16/12/14 10:19, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to add another two ACLE 2.0 predefined macros
into aarch64 backend.
They are __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_PWR and __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_STACK_PWR. Currently,
those two values are hard-wired to 16.
The following clauses
Hi,
the g++.dg/tree-ssa/pr61034.C has turned out to be sensitive to PUSH_ARGS
settings so fixing it on PPC64 caused x86_64 to regress. This patch introduce
temporary so the code is consistent between PPC64 and x86_64.
Comitted after ICR dicussion with Richard.
Honza
Index: ChangeLog
Hi all,
unsigned shift left dosen't support immediate shift. Previouly, gcc will
generate asm instruction like this: ushl d1, d0, 32, which is not a
legal insn and will be rejected by assembler. This patch change the use
of ushl in vec_shr_mode into shl.
A test case is added, and it passes
This patch adds CFI directives to the soft floating point support code for ARM.
Previously, if we tried to do a backtrace from that code in a debug session we'd
get something like this:
(gdb) bt
#0 __nedf2 () at
../../../../../../gcc-4.9.2/libgcc/config/arm/ieee754-df.S:1082
#1 0x0db6 in
On 04/27/2015 11:30 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
As reported in the PR, va_arg (ap, void) probably doesn't make any sense and
should be rejected thus. cc1plus and clang reject va_arg with an incomplete
type. This patch makes cc1 reject it as well.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, ok for
On 04/23/2015 07:56 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
The other tricky bit was to fix all expander bits that required
SSA_NAMEs to have a associated decl. I've removed all such cases, so we
can now expand anonymous SSA decls directly, without having to create an
ignored decl. Doing that, we can
On 03/19/2015 09:28 AM, James Bowman wrote:
Second ping.
Also, have attached updated patchset for the current gcc. Thanks.
Thanks. I don't see anything particularly worrisome from a correctness
standpoint. You may need to make minor updates to your .h file to cope
with some of Trevor's work
On 04/27/2015 02:21 PM, Jiong Wang wrote:
Funny, I find myself wanting this transformation in both places :-)
Expansion time so that we generate efficient code from the start and
combine to catch those cases which are too complex to see at expansion,
but due to other optimizations become
On 04/28/2015 08:20 PM, Aditya K wrote:
Hi,
This is a small patch where I moved a portion of code from the function
vectorize_loops outside to improve readability.
Please see the patch attached and give comments for improvements.
You need to add a comment for the new function. These function
On 04/28/2015 07:55 AM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
Tree if-conversion currently bails out for loops that (a) contain nested
loops; (b) have more than one exit; (c) where the exit block (source of
the exit edge) does not dominate the loop latch; (d) where the exit
block is the loop header, or there are
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Martin Galvan
martin.gal...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
This patch adds CFI directives to the soft floating point support code for
ARM.
Previously, if we tried to do a backtrace from that code in a debug session
we'd
get something like this:
(gdb) bt
I've renamed EXT_SSE_REG_P into EXT_REX_SSE_REG_P for consistency.
Ok for stage1?
Patch is OK for stage1.
--
Thanks, K
On 19 Mar 12:24, Ilya Tocar wrote:
Hi,
There were some discussion about x constraints being too conservative
for some patterns in i386.md.
Patch
On 04/28/2015 07:49 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Fix a simple case where we can generalise the CONST_INT handling to all
integer constants (CONST_DOUBLE or CONST_WIDE_INT).
Tested on x86_64-linux-gnu. OK to install?
Thanks,
Richard
gcc/
* loop-iv.c (canon_condition): Generalize to
On 04/28/2015 07:46 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
I still think we should rename label_rtx too, because I think it's
confusing for label_rtx to return something other than a label.
That's probably a separate, follow-up patch though.
Seems fine as a follow-up.
I added the member functions. The
Yes, this is already mentioned in PR 65910
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910).
There is a patch mentioned in that PR that both appears to fix the
problem and appears to have been approved. I thought the author of
the patch would commit it, but that does not appear to have
On 16 December 2014 at 10:19, Renlin Li renlin...@arm.com wrote:
2014-12-16 Renlin Li renlin...@arm.com
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h(TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS): Define
__ARM_ALIGN_MAX_PWR
and __ARM_ALIGN_MAX_STACK_PWR.
OK /Marcus
Hi Jakub!
We now have to revisit this discussion about
gcc/c-family/c-pragma.h:pragma_omp_clause,
http://news.gmane.org/find-root.php?message_id=%3C87bnn1rrv3.fsf%40schwinge.name%3E:
On Thu, 18 Dec 2014 14:48:32 +0100, I wrote:
-/* All clauses defined by OpenMP 2.5, 3.0, 3.1 and 4.0.
+/*
On 04/28/2015 11:12 AM, Caroline Tice wrote:
Yes, this is already mentioned in PR 65910
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910).
There is a patch mentioned in that PR that both appears to fix the
problem and appears to have been approved. I thought the author of
the patch would
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 9:20 AM, Ilya Tocar tocarip.in...@gmail.com wrote:
I've renamed EXT_SSE_REG_P into EXT_REX_SSE_REG_P for consistency.
Ok for stage1?
Patch is OK for stage1.
--
Thanks, K
On 19 Mar 12:24, Ilya Tocar wrote:
Hi,
There were some discussion about x
Thanks a lot. I don't have write access to the repository, could you
commit this for me?
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:19 PM, Martin Galvan
martin.gal...@tallertechnologies.com wrote:
This patch adds CFI
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Alan Lawrence alan.lawre...@arm.com wrote:
No new code here ;). There is a slight change of execution path, i.e. some
VEC_PERM_EXPRs (e.g. those for reductions via shifts) will be expanded
using
arm_expand_vec_perm_const rather than the vec_shr pattern. This
On 04/27/2015 05:03 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks good to me. Please install if you haven't already done so.
Thanks, I checked in the patch. I'm not maintainer of anything
currently, so I'm assuming all of my patches need to be
On Apr 27, 2015, at 4:03 PM, Jim Wilson jim.wil...@linaro.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Looks good to me. Please install if you haven't already done so.
Thanks, I checked in the patch. I'm not maintainer of anything
currently,
Actually, you
Caroline,
Your patch has broken bootstrap on AIX and probably other platforms.
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/varasm.c: In function 'void
assemble_end_function(tree, const char*)':
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/varasm.c:1870:12: error:
'ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_SIZE' was not declared in this scope
On Tue, 14 Apr 2015, Marek Polacek wrote:
You were right: my earlier fix for c/65345 only handled non-float types.
This patch thus handles even the float types. The fix is analogical to the
previous: use create_tmp_var_raw and TARGET_EXPR to avoid ICE.
This only fixes x86 though, other
I believe this is the same problem as
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-07/msg00292.html
The asprinf declaration is messed up when using clang to build gdb.
diff --git a/include/libiberty.h b/include/libiberty.h
index b33dd65..a294903 100644
--- a/include/libiberty.h
+++
On 04/28/2015 12:38 PM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:48 PM
To: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Jakub
Jelinek
Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski
Hi,
apparently we aren't implementing the bits of DR 1732 [C++14] about
range-based for declarations. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
///
/cp
2015-04-28 Paolo Carlini paolo.carl...@oracle.com
PR c++/59729, DR 1732
* parser.c
On 28-04-15 12:34, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 5:04 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com wrote:
On 27-04-15 15:40, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Tom de Vries tom_devr...@mentor.com
wrote:
On 27-04-15 10:17, Richard Biener wrote:
This patch
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:32:03PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
So Jakub says that using comp_unit_die () for the context of the stub
DIE is wrong and he is of course right. The following adjusted patch
uses the correct context, but only if we
Back in February I changed the way the Ada compiler recognizes imported C++
methods on Windows: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00478.html
Unfortunately this change uncovered a deeper issue with these C++ methods so
we have decided to change the -fdump-ada-spec output accordingly.
Hi,
Consider log.c:
...
#include math.h
void
f (double d)
{
log (d);
}
...
When compiling with -O2, at optimized dump the code looks like this, thanks to
pass_call_cdce:
...
f (double d)
{
bb 2:
if (d_2(D) = 0.0)
goto bb 3;
else
goto bb 4;
bb 3:
log (d_2(D)); [tail
Hi,
I will fix the free count issue - my internet access in China was bit sporadic
and I hoped you will know why the count seem to disagree between PPC64 and Linux
builds. In meantime PPC64 stopped to build for me.
(early) dwarf2out is a good place, likewise verifying right after
This fixes PR65851 and a few missed optimizations in CCP that can cause
similar issues. This also fixes set_lattice_value to pass new_val
by reference so that in case we drop to VARYING the caller can see that.
It also uses operand_equal_p instead of simple_cst_equal because the
latter doesn't
From: Marcus Shawcroft [mailto:marcus.shawcr...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2015 5:17 PM
*** gcc/ChangeLog ***
2015-01-26 Thomas Preud'homme thomas.preudho...@arm.com
* config.gcc: Add cortex-a57-fma-steering.o to extra_objs for
aarch64-*-*.
*
The following fixes a missed optimization in basic-block vectorization.
Currently we require the SLP chain to end up in a sequence of loads
we support. But of course we can in theory end the SLP chain at
any point and simply construct the vector operand of the uses by
pieces. This is what the
Hi!
Committed to gomp-4_0-branch in r222513:
commit be14a100eee0a16881bf59c4dc1b869e483fd6cb
Merge: 9973ee1 8047deb
Author: tschwinge tschwinge@138bc75d-0d04-0410-961f-82ee72b054a4
Date: Tue Apr 28 08:22:41 2015 +
svn merge -r 221877:222446 svn+ssh://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux, applying to trunk.
2015-04-28 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
* c-parser.c (c_parser_binary_expression): Remove duplicate line.
diff --git gcc/c/c-parser.c gcc/c/c-parser.c
index f5e2ac2c..cc8a4e3 100644
--- gcc/c/c-parser.c
+++
Hi,
On 04/28/2015 02:59 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/28/2015 08:54 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 04/28/2015 02:45 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/28/2015 06:59 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
!DECL_FRIEND_PSEUDO_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (t)
the name
of the macro seems weird to me: it
This patch changes the default processor for mips4 from the r8000 to the
r1. There are several reasons for this change, the main one
being the difference in the r8000 madd instruction and the rest of the mips4
family. The r8000 has a fused madd instruction (no truncation between the
multiply
On 04/28/2015 03:44 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
Ping.
-Original Message-
From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:57 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Alan Modra; David Edelsohn; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; Dharmakan
On 04/28/2015 04:49 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
This improves -Wbool-compare a bit: boolean = 0 is always true, on the other
hand boolean 0 is always false, and similar.
One feature/bug is that in C++ we don't warn for e.g. bool = false, since the
warning cares about bool CMP non-bool or non-bool
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 06:59:12PM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
We're getting ready to submit patches extending the C/C++ front ends for
the remaining OpenACC clauses, and given the current layout of
gcc/c-family/c-pragma.h:pragma_omp_clause, we're then at 69 unique
clauses, which is more
On Tue, 28 Apr 2015, Caroline Tice wrote:
Yes, this is already mentioned in PR 65910
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910).
There is a patch mentioned in that PR that both appears to fix the
problem and appears to have been approved. I thought the author of
the patch would
I just committed the patch for Dominique.
- David
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com wrote:
Yes, this is already mentioned in PR 65910
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65910).
There is a patch mentioned in that PR that both appears to fix the
Thank you!
-- Caroline Tice
cmt...@google.com
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 10:16 AM, David Edelsohn dje@gmail.com wrote:
I just committed the patch for Dominique.
- David
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 1:12 PM, Caroline Tice cmt...@google.com wrote:
Yes, this is already mentioned in PR 65910
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo
