* ping *
On 05/13/2015 06:58 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
The attached patch reverts a change I made for pr65456 which caused this
regression and adds a check for quotes farther down in the function. This
avoids treating a '!' in a string as a comment and wiping the rest of the
line.
I found
On 16/05/15 11:39 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 14/05/2015 15:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Reported by Nathan and fixed by his patch. I added the tests.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk. This should be
backported too.
While backporting to debug and profile mode I noticed that
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 07:52:38AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
* ping *
2015-05-14 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/65903
* io.c (format_lex): Change to NONSTRING when checking for
possible doubled quote.
* scanner.c (gfc_next_char_literal): Revert
On 05/16/2015 08:11 AM, Steve Kargl wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 07:52:38AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
* ping *
2015-05-14 Jerry DeLisle jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/65903
* io.c (format_lex): Change to NONSTRING when checking for
possible doubled quote.
*
On 14 May 2015 at 19:47, Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Thu, 14 May 2015, Iain Buclaw wrote:
On another note, I've found out why the remaining 20 symbols in my 75k
sample failed. They don't fail at all! It's just that they were all
greater than 33,000 characters in length,
Hello,
this is about PR61831 where in code like:
type :: string_t
character(LEN=1), dimension(:), allocatable :: chars
end type string_t
type(string_t) :: prt_in
(...)
tmp = new_prt_spec ([prt_in])
the deallocation of the
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:36:38PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:40:48PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
I confess the test-case-guarded addi pattern should have been
expressed with a shift in addition to the
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 07:13:35AM +, Aditya K wrote:
Hi,
I have tried to refactor gimple_expr_type to make it more readable. Removed
the switch block and redundant if.
Please review this patch.
for some reason your mail client seems to be inserting non breaking
spaces all over the
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:03 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:59:56AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:19 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at
Adding myself as Write After Approval.
Regards
Iain
---
ChangeLog | 4
MAINTAINERS | 1 +
2 files changed, 5 insertions(+)
--- ChangeLog
+++ ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2015-05-16 Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org
+
+ * MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself.
+
2015-05-11
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:34:57PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:30 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:14 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
My relax branch proposal works
Le 14/05/2015 03:58, Jerry DeLisle a écrit :
The attached patch reverts a change I made for pr65456 which caused this
regression and adds a check for quotes farther down in the function. This
avoids treating a '!' in a string as a comment and wiping the rest of the
line.
I found the added
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 11:59:56AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:19 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:34:57PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:30 PM, H.J. Lu
PR fortran/66045
* expr.c (gfc_check_assign): Check for assignment of NULL() instead
of the (intended) pointer assignment.
OK
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 7:19 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:49 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 04:34:57PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:30 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 4:14 PM,
On 14 May 2015 at 17:30, Iain Buclaw ibuc...@gdcproject.org wrote:
On 14 May 2015 at 15:24, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/13/2015 02:51 AM, Iain Buclaw wrote:
In my tests, this gives the demangler near-complete support. Of a
sample of about 75k symbols pulled from the standard
On 05/16/2015 10:45 AM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
--- snip ---
Thanks Steve,
Committed revision 223248.
I had some time to play with this a little more this afternoon.
I am going to commit the following little patchlet that gives us the nice
warning we should have. (After full regression
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:40:48PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
I confess the test-case-guarded addi pattern should have been
expressed with a shift in addition to the multiplication.
But they wouldn't ever match so they might very well have bitrotted
by now :-(
(In
addition to as the
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:40:48PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
I confess the test-case-guarded addi pattern should have been
expressed with a shift in addition to the multiplication.
But they wouldn't ever match so they might very well
On 05/16/2015 08:17 AM, Mikael Morin wrote:
snip
Index: gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_13.f90
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/continuation_13.f90(revision 223105)
+++
Le 15/05/2015 17:19, Steve Kargl a écrit :
Regression tested on trunk. OK to commit?
Hello,
Index: gcc/fortran/decl.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/decl.c(revision 223094)
+++ gcc/fortran/decl.c(working copy)
@@
Hi Richard,
I see regressions with the current IBM z13 vector patchset which appear to be
related to the new
genrecog.
The following two insn definitions only differ in the mode and predicate of the
shift count operand.
(define_insn lshrmode3
[(set (match_operand:VI 0
Dear Mikael,
With your tweak it bootstrapped and regtested OK. Also changed the
comment after Steve's pointing out that the last sentence was
incomprehensible:-)
Committed to trunk as revision 223234.
Cheers
Paul
2015-05-16 Mikael Morin mik...@gcc.gnu.org
Paul Thomas
On 14/05/2015 15:47, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Reported by Nathan and fixed by his patch. I added the tests.
Tested powerpc64le-linux, committed to trunk. This should be
backported too.
While backporting to debug and profile mode I noticed that those
constructors were not the only missing ones.
Hello world,
this (rather obvious) patch fixes array declarations in deeply nested
BLOCKs.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
Thomas
2015-05-16 Thomas Koenig tkoe...@gcc.gnu.org
PR fortran/66113
* expr.c (is_parent_of_current_ns): New function.
Le 16/05/2015 12:35, Thomas Koenig a écrit :
Hello world,
this (rather obvious) patch fixes array declarations in deeply nested
BLOCKs.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk?
OK, thanks.
Mikael
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:36:38PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:40:48PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
I confess the test-case-guarded addi pattern should have
Hi,
while debugging verify_type ICE I noticed that we output debug info to slim-lto
files.
This debug info is never used for anything and should be omitted. I wonder if
this
can go also to rleease branches since it will likely make the slim files
smaller.
Of course things will change with
28 matches
Mail list logo
