Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/18/2015 12:13 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch adds a REG_NREGS macro that by the end of the series
will simply be an rtx field access. The definition in this patch
is just a placeholder (and so I haven't tried to avoid the double
evaluation of
Good Day,
Your package arrived successfully.
Awaiting your reply for onward delivery.
Sincerely,
Mr. Rowland Dewey
(Cargo Unit Director)
On 05/15/2015 10:22 AM, Torvald Riegel wrote:
This patch improves the documentation of the built-ins for atomic
operations.
First, to be consistent with the C++11 standard and make it easier for
users to relate the built-ins to the C++11 specification, the patch
changes 'memory model' to
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
On 05/18/2015 12:19 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
This patch replaces the current REG i0 format with a dedicated structure,
so that we can make use of the extra 32 bits in the i field.
Of the places that iterate on formats and do something for 'i's,
most
Hi,
Since a recent change to the tree optimizers
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg00089.html
some related SH patterns stopped working. The attached patch fixes
this.
Tested briefly with 'make all' and with
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS=sh.exp=pr54236* --target_board=sh-sim
The attached patch activates the -mtune=native and -march=native
command line options on S390 and System z. Most of the code is a
modified copy of gcc/config/mips/driver-native.c. ChangeLog
attached.
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-05 Dominik Vogt
Yes, the patch appears to catch those as well.
Then: OK to commit.
Thanks!
FX
On 05/17/2015 09:42 PM, Jim Wilson wrote:
Every check_$lang_parallelize setting is in the language specific
Make-lang.in file except for the C front-end check_gcc_parallelize
setting which is in the toplevel Makefile.in file. This seems to be
an oversight, as it was only 3 years ago that the c/
On 05/19/2015 01:00 AM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Just to confirm, this doesn't change the size of a REG object, right?
If it doesn't change the size, then it's OK.
It doesn't change the size for LP64 hosts. It makes it 32 bits bigger
for ILP32 hosts. See
We have the following problem with selectively compiling modules with
-misa options and I have provided a solution to solve this. I would
like to hear what you think.
Multi versioning at module granularity is done by compiling a subset
of modules with advanced ISA instructions, supported on
On 05/15/2015 03:59 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch was regtested on ppc64le-redhat-linux.
2015-05-15 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
gcc/
* convert.c (convert_to_integer, convert_to_vector): Include the
types in the error message.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/simd-1.c:
On 05/15/2015 08:38 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hello.
Following patch attempts to rewrite memory reports for GCC's internal
allocations
so that it uses a new template type. The type shares parts which are
currently duplicated,
adds support for special 'counters' and introduces new support for
[ moved to gcc-patches ml ]
On 18-05-15 17:31, Tom de Vries wrote:
Thomas,
In ran into this bootstrap failure with branch gomp-4_0-branch:
...
src/gcc-gomp-4_0-branch/gcc/omp-low.c:2897:1: error: 'omp_context*
enclosing_target_ctx(omp_context*)' defined but not used
[-Werror=unused-function]
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:33:08AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
Would that be a good idea ? For symmetry, I thought
(for op (list)
op2 (op))
should be supported too.
Hmm, but is this really a useful extension? To me it just complicates
the syntax for the occasional reader.
On 05/18/2015 07:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 05/11/2015 06:23 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
@@ -6784,14 +6784,18 @@ expand_vec_perm (machine_mode mode, rtx v0, rtx v1,
rtx sel, rtx target)
{
/* Multiply each element by its byte size. */
machine_mode selmode =
On 05/18/2015 04:19 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Andreas Krebbel
kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
The new version also changes the type for the alternative_mask to unsigned
HOST_WIDE_INT.
Bootstrapped without regressions on x86-64.
Ok to apply?
Please use
Some pieces of code create a temporary REG or MEM and only fill it
in later when they're testing the cost of a particular rtx. This patch
makes sure that even the dummy REG or MEM is valid, rather than force
the gen_* code to handle garbage values.
gcc/
* caller-save.c
I forgot to roll back SLP child state when ending up building vectors
from scalars.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-05-19 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/66185
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_build_slp_tree): Properly
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Aditya K hiradi...@msn.com wrote:
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 12:08:58 +0200
Subject: Re: Refactor gimple_expr_type
From: richard.guent...@gmail.com
To: hiradi...@msn.com
CC: tbsau...@tbsaunde.org;
Ping
2015-05-05 11:06 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Ping
2015-04-14 12:14 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
On 10 Apr 03:15, Jan Hubicka wrote:
References are not streamed out for nodes which are referenced in a
partition but don't belong to it
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Andreas Krebbel
kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
On 05/18/2015 04:19 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 3:41 PM, Andreas Krebbel
kreb...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
The new version also changes the type for the alternative_mask to unsigned
On Mon, 18 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
genmatch generates incorrect code for following (artificial) pattern:
(for op (plus)
op2 (op)
(simplify
Hi all,
find attached latest version to fix 65548.
Bootstraps and regtests ok on x86_64-linux-gnu/f21.
- Andre
--
Andre Vehreschild * Email: vehre ad gmx dot de
pr65548_5.clog
Description: Binary data
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-stmt.c
index 814bdde..6d565ae
On Mon, 18 May 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As the testcases show, for signed types we really should use SIGNED rather
than UNSIGNED as tree_int_cst_min_precision argument, that function doesn't
really do the desired thing with UNSIGNED for negative values and with
-fwrapv we just want
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
genmatch segfaults on:
(define_operator_list op (plus))
The above syntax is invalid, and it segfaults on:
fatal_error (token, operator list is empty);
because token is NULL.
The patch puts a check for CPP_CLOSE_PAREN after parsing
Ping
2015-05-05 11:05 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
Ping
2015-04-14 17:35 GMT+03:00 Ilya Enkovich enkovich@gmail.com:
On 10 Apr 03:27, Jan Hubicka wrote:
+ /* We might propagate instrumented function pointer into
+ not instrumented function and vice versa. In
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
We have the following problem with selectively compiling modules with
-misa options and I have provided a solution to solve this. I would
like to hear what you think.
Multi versioning at module granularity is done by
On Mon, 18 May 2015, Jan Hubicka wrote:
+ if (!comp_type_attributes (t1, t2))
+ return false;
Because I think the TBAA does not care about attribute lists. I suppose
this
is kind-of harmless because of:
I think that was about attributes like 'packed', but those
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 20:17, Prathamesh Kulkarni
prathamesh.kulka...@linaro.org wrote:
On 18 May 2015 at 14:12, Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
genmatch generates incorrect code for
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2015-05-19 Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de
PR tree-optimization/66165
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_supported_load_permutation_p): Add guard
for no load permutation.
* gcc.dg/torture/pr66165.c:
On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 7:02 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, May 4, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Abderrazek Zaafrani
az.zaafr...@gmail.com wrote:
This is an old thread and we are still running into similar issues:
Code is not being vectorized on 64-bit target due to scev not
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
Well, not really - but at least don't fail vectorization because of that
but allow it to proceed the build up from scalar pieces path.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
The testcase FAILs on Solaris/SPARC:
FAIL:
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 11:16:02AM +0100, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
The ICE in the PR happens when we pass a 1x(128-bit float) vector as an
argument.
The aarch64 backend erroneously classifies it as a composite type when in
fact it
is a short vector according to AAPCS64
(section 4.1.2
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:17 PM, Thomas Preud'homme wrote:
2015-05-18 Thomas Preud'homme
PR rtl-optimization/66168
* loop-invariant.c (move_invariant_reg): Set inv-reg to destination
of inv-insn when moving an invariant without introducing a temporary
Hi all,
This patch adds a mention of the new native cpu detection feature in aarch64
GNU/Linux.
Gerald, this is a patch against htdocs/gcc-6/changes.html and I thought I had
seen the 'changes' link
in gcc.gnu.org earlier but I don't see it now (there's only a release criteria
link).
Is this a
Hi all,
update based on latest 65548 (v5) patch and current trunk. Description and
issue addressed unchanged (see cite below).
Bootstrapped and regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu/f21.
Any volunteers to review? The initial version dates back to March 30. 2015. Not
a single comment so far!
- Andre
Hi,
This patch fixes an oversight whereby if the CUDA libraries are
available for some reason on a system that doesn't actually contain an
nVidia card, an OpenACC program will raise an error if the NVPTX
backend is picked as a default instead of falling back to some other
device instead.
OK for
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:36:58AM +0100, Julian Brown wrote:
This patch fixes an oversight whereby if the CUDA libraries are
available for some reason on a system that doesn't actually contain an
nVidia card, an OpenACC program will raise an error if the NVPTX
backend is picked as a default
Hi,
r223113 made it possible for invariant to actually be moved rather than
moving the source to a new pseudoregister. However, when doing so
the inv-reg is not set up properly: in case of a subreg destination it
holds the inner register rather than the subreg expression.
This patch fixes that.
Hi,
This patch adds several tests of vector-single/vector-partitioned mode,
as part of work implementing the OpenACC execution model.
Pre-approved for gomp4 branch. I will apply there shortly.
Thanks,
Julian
ChangeLog
libgomp/
*
On Tue, 19 May 2015, Rainer Orth wrote:
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de writes:
Well, not really - but at least don't fail vectorization because of that
but allow it to proceed the build up from scalar pieces path.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied to trunk.
Hi Guys,
I am applying the patch below to enhance the zero_extendhisi2 pattern
in the MSP430 backend so that it can cope with separate source and
destination registers. This makes zero extending into another
register more efficient and it also helps to work around a reload bug
reported
Ping!
Regards
Senthil
On Fri, Apr 10, 2015 at 12:19:36PM +0530, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote:
Hi,
This (rather big) patch is an attempt to generate per function DWARF
information for functions that go into their own sections (through
-ffunction-section or otherwise). This is so that
From: Trevor Saunders tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org
Hi,
This is a straight forward fixup of the hash table descriptor in winnt.c
causing the PR.
Tested a cross to i686-cygwin now builds, and committing to trunk.
Trev
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-05-19 Trevor Saunders tbsaunde+...@tbsaunde.org
2015-05-20 Max Filippov jcmvb...@gmail.com
gcc/
* config/xtensa/xtensa.c (init_alignment_context): Replace MULT
by BITS_PER_UNIT with ASHIFT by exact_log2 (BITS_PER_UNIT).
---
gcc/config/xtensa/xtensa.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
This seems reasonable to me.
Alan, any thoughts from you?
Looks good.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:27:06PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:17:18PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Richard
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 07:40:15AM -0500, Lynn A. Boger wrote:
Questions on the use of the options for split stack:
- The way this is implemented, split stack is generated if the
target platform supports split stack, on ppc64/ppc64le as well
as on x86, and the use of -fno-split-stack doesn't
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 05:10:11PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:54 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 01:27:06PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:17:18PM
I've committed this obvious patch for 65954. We failed to issue a diagnostic
for a failed class enum lookup, and returned NULL, rather than error_mark_node,
leading to a seg fault.
booted tested on x86_64-linux.
nathan
2015-05-19 Nathan sidwell nat...@acm.org
cp/
PR c++/65954
*
Honza pointed out we were leaking some memory in the jump threading
code. There's at least two leaks, this fixes the first.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Installed on the trunk.
commit f4517a9d2f17b0890d9fe1159a3981985bed5672
Author: Jeff Law
On 07/05/15 17:24, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 03:12:33AM +0100, Kugan wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-04-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah kug...@linaro.org
Jim Wilson jim.wil...@linaro.org
* config/arm/aarch-common-protos.h (struct mem_cost_table): Added
new
On 05/19/2015 05:34 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
This seems reasonable to me.
Alan, any thoughts from you?
Looks good.
Thanks. I've checked the patch into mainline (r223418). I assume this
is also a candidate for backporting to
On 05/02/2015 04:16 PM, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
This extends' static assert to not require a message string.
I elected to make this work also for C++11 and C++14 and warn only
with -pedantic.
I think many people just write
static_assert(thing, );
.
I took the path of building an empty
Richard,
this is my attempt to make sense of TYPE_CANONICAL at LTO. My undrestanding is
that gimple_canonical_types_compatible_p needs to return true for all pairs of
types that are considered compatible across compilation unit for any of
languages we support (and in a sane way for cross
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 02:05:59PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch changes rs6000_stack_info to keep save areas offsets even
when not used. I need lr_save_offset valid for split-stack, and it
seemed reasonable to
Thanks for reviewing! Somehow I missed seeing your OK in yesterday's
email. I have far too many emails in my inbox.. Patch series
committed as revisions 223424, 223425, 223426, and 223427. I made a
change to the comment for rs6000_supports_split_stack, instead of
/* -fsplit-stack uses a field
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:03 PM, Sandra Loosemore
san...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On 05/19/2015 05:34 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 02:18:23PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
This seems reasonable to me.
Alan, any thoughts from you?
Looks good.
Thanks. I've checked the
2015-05-18 16:51 GMT-03:00 andres.tirabos...@tallertechnologies.com:
Hi, this patch adds two new plugin events PLUGIN_START_PARSE_FUNCTION and
PLUGIN_FINISH_PARSE_FUNCTION. These events are invoked at start_function and
finish_function in gcc/c/c-decl.c and gcc/cp/decl.c respectively in the
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 09:30:48PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
This patch series is a follow-up to the tests I already contributed,
converted from my original testsuite.
This series consists in 13 new files, which can be committed
independently.
Another series (hopefully final) will
On 17/05/15 22:21 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Ok, I just commit fixing some other lines length except those having a
long hyperlink, I didn't want to break those.
Yep, thanks. I think we should backport Nathan's patch and your one to
the gcc-5-branch too.
I'll make a note to do that before
Hi,
so here is the update on pr 64674. Besides adapting to current trunk nothing
has changed from the previous version. The links for getting the patches this
one depends on are:
PR65548 v5: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-05/msg00123.html and
PR44672 v6:
Test gcc.c-torture/execute/memcpy-bi.c (-O2) failed for attiny40 device.
Cause seems to be in load from memory as it is not restoring base
register after load instructions generated.
Function avr_out_load_psi_reg_no_disp_tiny in avr.c:
It returns just after emitting instructions to load from
Hi,
Like the ARM port, the AArch64 ports needs to set glibc_integral_traps
to false as integer divide instructions do not trap.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu
Ok to apply ?
regards
Ramana
2015-05-17 Ramana Radhakrishnan ramana.radhakrish...@arm.com
This PR points out that we output same -Wformat warning twice when using
__attribute__ ((format)). The problem was that attribute_value_equal
(called when processing merge_attributes) got two lists:
format printf, 1, 2 and __format__ __printf__, 1, 2, these should be
equal. But since
This fixes some missed optimizations I should have made when adding
the new std::__cxx11::list, making use of the O(1) list::size() when
it saves work.
In the equality comparisons two lists can't be equal if their sizes
differ.
When resizing a list we don't need to walk the list to find whether
Hardware Integer divide instructions do not trap. Define this to be so
for the ARM port.
Applied to trunk after a build and test across architecture ranges and a
bootstrap and regression run on a Cortex-A15 - a v7ve core that has
hardware divide instructions.
A patch for AArch64 follows.
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Joseph Myers jos...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, 18 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
Have updates for all affected specs for all targets been posted? I just
saw a small and apparently arbitrary subset of targets with patches, and
no explanation of how those
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
No functional changes.
2015-05-18 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_legitimize_reload_address)
(alpha_preferred_reload_class, alpha_legitimate_constant_p): Use
CONST_INT_P,
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] on behalf
of H.J. Lu [hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:27 AM
To: Joseph Myers
Cc: Magnus Granberg; GCC Patches
Subject: Re: PING^3: [PATCH]: New configure options that
On Tue, 19 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
I think the whole thing should be posted as one patch, with both the
target-independent changes and the target-specific changes for all
targets.
That is what makes me concerned. I have some simple target-specified
patches which weren't reviewed for
On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:54 PM, Alan Modra amo...@gmail.com wrote:
This patch tidies the prologue and epilogue altivec code a little.
A number of places using info-altivec_size unnecessarily also test
TARGET_ALTIVEC_ABI, when rs6000_stack_info() guarantees that
info-altivec_size is zero if
On 05/19/2015 08:43 AM, Michael Matz wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 15 May 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
Forget lazy binding. It's dead anyway because serious distros want
PIE+relro+bindnow+...
You keep saying this, but I can't help the feeling it's mostly because
musl doesn't support it ;-)
FWIW, Red Hat
This small refinement to the -fsplit-stack prologue arg pointer
initialization improves code generation. Compare the -O2
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/split-3.c code for down() below.
beforeafter
mflr 0mflr 0
std 31,-8(1)std 31,-8(1)
std 0,16(1)mr 12,1
On 05/19/2015 01:41 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
On 05/18/2015 07:35 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 05/11/2015 06:23 AM, Andreas Krebbel wrote:
@@ -6784,14 +6784,18 @@ expand_vec_perm (machine_mode mode, rtx v0, rtx v1,
rtx sel, rtx target)
{
/* Multiply each element by its byte
From: Richard Sandiford richard.sandif...@arm.com
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 20:09:19 +0200
While looking at a profile of gcc, I noticed one thing fairly high
up the list was a loop iterating over all the registers in a REG,
apparently due to the delay in computing the index for hard_regno_nregs
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:33 AM, paul_kon...@dell.com wrote:
From: gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org [gcc-patches-ow...@gcc.gnu.org] on behalf
of H.J. Lu [hjl.to...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, May 19, 2015 11:27 AM
To: Joseph Myers
Cc: Magnus Granberg;
Hi,
On Fri, 15 May 2015, Rich Felker wrote:
Forget lazy binding. It's dead anyway because serious distros want
PIE+relro+bindnow+...
You keep saying this, but I can't help the feeling it's mostly because
musl doesn't support it ;-)
No, you don't have to use bindnow to get the effects of
No functional changes.
2015-05-18 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (alpha_legitimize_reload_address)
(alpha_preferred_reload_class, alpha_legitimate_constant_p): Use
CONST_INT_P, CONST_SCALAR_INT_P and CONST_DOUBLE_P predicates.
(alpha_split_reload_pair)
On Mon, 18 May 2015, H.J. Lu wrote:
Have updates for all affected specs for all targets been posted? I just
saw a small and apparently arbitrary subset of targets with patches, and
no explanation of how those targets were identified or why the other
targets with specs mentioning the
Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 11:33:16 +0200
Subject: Re: Refactor gimple_expr_type
From: richard.guent...@gmail.com
To: hiradi...@msn.com
CC: tbsau...@tbsaunde.org; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:04 AM, Aditya K hiradi...@msn.com
Re-pinging a patch from last year that never got reviewed:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg00511.html
This problem still exists in GCC 5.1 and the above patch still fixes it.
I haven't tried mainline head yet, but it doesn't look like anything
else has touched this since we
Hi!
When working on taskloop, I've noticed various issues in the OpenMP 4.0
handling of the linear/lastprivate (explicit as well as implicit) clauses.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk,
plan to backport to 5/4.9 after a while.
2015-05-19 Jakub Jelinek
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 8:16 AM, Sriraman Tallam tmsri...@google.com wrote:
We have the following problem with selectively compiling modules with
-misa options and I have provided a solution to solve this. I
Hi,
The original patch had a missing declaration of micromips_globals in mips.h
that appears to be the cause of segmentation faults when building
mips-mti-linux-gnu.
I didn't get any failures just before the submission neither on
mips-img-linux-gnu
nor mips64el-linux-gnu and the test case is
On 05/19/2015 11:06 AM, Rich Felker wrote:
I'm still mildly worried that concerns for supporting
relaxation might lead to decisions not to optimize code in ways that
would be difficult to relax (e.g. certain types of address load
reordering or hoisting) but I don't understand GCC internals
Hi Venkat,
On 19/05/15 16:37, Kumar, Venkataramanan wrote:
Hi Maintainers,
Please find the attached patch, that fixes add/extend gcc test suite failures
in Aarch64 target.
Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66049
These tests started to fail after we prevented combiner from
Hi Maintainers,
Please find the attached patch, that fixes add/extend gcc test suite failures
in Aarch64 target.
Ref: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66049
These tests started to fail after we prevented combiner from converting shift
RTX to mult RTX, when the RTX is not inside
Hm. But which options are unsafe? Also wouldn't it be better to simply
_not_ have unsafe options produce comdats but always make local clones
for them (thus emit the comdat with unsafe flags dropped)?
Always localize comdat functions may lead to text size increase. It
does not work if the
Hi,
attached is the most recent version of the patch for 58586. It adapts to
recent trunk and addresses the caveats so far, i.e. the testcases in the
comments now compile and run again w/o errors.
Bootstraps and regtests fine on x86_64-linux-gnu/f21.
Comments?
- Andre
On Fri, 8 May 2015
Le 19/05/2015 10:50, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
Hi all,
find attached latest version to fix 65548.
Bootstraps and regtests ok on x86_64-linux-gnu/f21.
OK. Thanks.
Mikael
On 05/19/2015 09:16 AM, Sriraman Tallam wrote:
We have the following problem with selectively compiling modules with
-misa options and I have provided a solution to solve this. I would
like to hear what you think.
Multi versioning at module granularity is done by compiling a subset
of modules
On 05/16/2015 07:55 PM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Sat, May 16, 2015 at 12:36:38PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2015, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 10:40:48PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
I confess
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 01:05:59PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 05/06/2015 11:29 AM, Michael Meissner wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:03:00PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Jeff Law l...@redhat.com writes:
So my worry here is that folks writing these loops to iterate over modes
are going to
Jason,
I just noticed that there are bogus ODR violation warnings during LTO-bootstrap
(that breaks -Werror builds). It was caused by my work-around for
type_in_anonymous_namespace
for the issue discussed in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-05/msg01245.html
(i.e. the TYPE_STUB_DECL
On 05/19/2015 01:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
I tracked down that those are implicit typedef created by
create_implicit_typedef.
My patch made them no longer anonymous that in turn triggers the bogus
diagnostics.
I do not think it is fully correct though - those types are not anonymous.
Hmm?
On 05/19/2015 01:33 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
I tracked down that those are implicit typedef created by
create_implicit_typedef.
My patch made them no longer anonymous that in turn triggers the bogus
diagnostics.
I do not think it is fully correct though - those types are not anonymous.
On 05/18/2015 11:07 PM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
It seems rather weird to me: I have definitely sent this message, but
now I realized that it did not get to the mailing list archive (and it
was not bounced either). Thus, resending.
I got the original, not sure why it didn't show up in the
On 05/19/2015 12:35 PM, Rich Felker wrote:
Why would you recompute it (this requires a fairly expensive call that
reads or pops its own return address) rather than simply spilling the
already-computed value and reloading it from the stack?
The only example I can think of where it might make
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 1:15 PM, Rich Felker dal...@libc.org wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:17:18PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 05/19/2015 12:06 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Tue, May 19, 2015 at 11:59 AM, Richard Henderson
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
