Hi all,
Currently when evaluating expressions like (a ? 24 : 25) we will move 24 and 25
into
registers and perform a csel on them. This misses the opportunity to instead
move just 24
into a register and then perform a csinc, saving us an instruction and a
register use.
Similarly for csneg
Hi Andrew,
On 10/07/15 09:40, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2015, at 1:34 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently when evaluating expressions like (a ? 24 : 25) we will move 24 and 25
into
registers and perform a csel on them. This misses the opportunity
On Jul 10, 2015, at 1:34 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently when evaluating expressions like (a ? 24 : 25) we will move 24 and
25 into
registers and perform a csel on them. This misses the opportunity to instead
move just 24
into a register and
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
That violates the coding style by not using tabs ;)
I knew it! Somebody would notice, pffft. Fixed in the committed version.
I also noticed it but didn't care ;) But now I
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Note this opens the window for other important wrong-code fixes - please
CC me on any you'd like to propose for GCC 5.2 and wait for my
explicit approval.
Can I backport the patch in
[SH] Fix PR target/66780
Hi,
As I wrote at
[PATCH, libcpp]: Use asm flag outputs in search_line_sse42 main loop
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg113610.html
I wont repeat myself with reasons summary is that current sse4.2 code is
reduntant as it has same performance as sse2 one.
This improves
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:23 PM, Michael Matz m...@suse.de wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
That violates the coding style by not using tabs ;)
I knew it! Somebody would notice, pffft.
On Jul 10, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 10/07/15 09:40, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2015, at 1:34 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently when evaluating expressions like (a ? 24 : 25) we
Hi!
On Thu, 09 Jul 2015 20:25:22 -0400, Nathan Sidwell nat...@acm.org wrote:
This is the patch I committed.
:-) Whee!
From testing this, two things:
1. Can you please have a look at the following ICE? I suppose you can
reproduce this in your non-checking build by just unconditionally
Hi Richard,
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 8:03 PM
To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer (ger...@pfeifer.com); gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [Patch wwwdocs] gcc-5/changes.html : Document AMD
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
As discussed on IRC, we have a problem because fold_stmt can call
force_gimple_operand_1, which in turn does
push_gimplify_context/pop_gimplify_context (NULL), even when inside
of some gimplify_ctxp and thus pushes the decls into function
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
The following fixes a stupid bug with -ftree-loop-if-convert-stores.
We were treating all but the same base as candidate to determine
whether a ref was accessed unconditionally ...
Bootstrap regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Applied
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 225618.
2015-07-09 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/66782
* lra-int.h (struct lra_insn_recog_data): Add comment about
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:37 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/09/2015 09:41 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 09:34:25AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/09/2015 08:13 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:56:35PM +0200, mliska wrote:
---
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Kaz Kojima wrote:
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Note this opens the window for other important wrong-code fixes - please
CC me on any you'd like to propose for GCC 5.2 and wait for my
explicit approval.
Can I backport the patch in
[SH] Fix PR
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 5:39 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/09/2015 07:56 AM, mliska wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-07-09 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* tree-ssa-tail-merge.c (gimple_operand_equal_value_p): Remove.
(gimple_equal_p): Remove.
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Kumar, Venkataramanan
venkataramanan.ku...@amd.com wrote:
Hi Richard,
-Original Message-
From: Richard Biener [mailto:richard.guent...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 8:03 PM
To: Kumar, Venkataramanan
Cc: Gerald Pfeifer (ger...@pfeifer.com);
Pinging this patch.
Thank you,
- Mantas
On 13/02/15 10:03, Mantas Mikaitis wrote:
Hi all,
This is a backport for gcc-4_9-branch of the patch [PATCH][ARM]
__ARM_FP __ARM_NEON_FP defined when -march=armv7-m posted in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00250.html
Hello!
As I wrote at
[PATCH, libcpp]: Use asm flag outputs in search_line_sse42 main loop
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg113610.html
I wont repeat myself with reasons summary is that current sse4.2 code is
reduntant as it has same performance as sse2 one.
This
Hi all,
this means that pr66775 is to be closed as resolved invalid, because the
current implementation is alright, but only the program to compile is garbage.
Ok, suits me.
- Andre
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 12:41:31 -0700
Steve Kargl s...@troutmask.apl.washington.edu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at
Hi all,
As subject says.
Committed as obvious with r225659.
Thanks,
Kyrill
2015-07-10 Kyrylo Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com
* expr.c (expand_cond_expr_using_cmove): Fix typos in comment
above function.
diff --git a/gcc/expr.c b/gcc/expr.c
index 34930c5..6f6ee9d 100644
---
Richard Biener rguent...@suse.de wrote:
Can I backport the patch in
[SH] Fix PR target/66780
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-07/msg00472.html
to gcc-5.2? It's a few lines change for a SH specific wrong code bug
with -fstack-protector which is disastrous for Debian SH folks who
Hi Jeff,
Thank you for the suggestion! I will committed it first and continue
working on it.
Regards,
Renlin Li
On 08/07/15 21:56, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/08/2015 09:03 AM, Renlin Li wrote:
Hi all,
In simplify_const_relational_operation function, there are cases a const
rtx
will be
Hi All,
Here is presented simple transformation which tries to hoist out of
outer-loop a check on zero trip count for inner-loop. This is very
restricted transformation since it accepts outer-loops with very
simple cfg, as for example:
acc = 0;
for (i = 1; i = m; i++) {
for (j = 0; j
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
gen_rtx_ZERO_EXTEND isn't suitable in ix86_md_asm_adjust since ZERO_EXTEND
may be expaned. We should call gen_zero_extendqiXi2 instead.
OK for trunk?
No, your patch will clobber flags when multiple flag outputs are used.
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the German team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/de.po
(This file, 'gcc-5.1.0.de.po', has just
On 10 July 2015 at 09:14, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 07/09/2015 05:39 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Some multilibs do not support Thumb mode on ARM targets. This is the
case for instance when target is arm-linux-gnueabihf and with
-march=armv5-t: Thumb-1 hard-float VFP ABI
On 10 July 2015 at 08:51, Ondřej Bílka nel...@seznam.cz wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:46:08PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
[toupper/tolower patch withdrawn]
I don't think this can be correct for all locales which need not
have a
I was just testing the patch below which runs into latent issues when
building libjava (at least)...
/space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/libjava/java/lang/natClassLoader.cc: In
function ‘java::lang::Class* _Jv_FindClassInCache(_Jv_Utf8Const*)’:
yOn Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
I was just testing the patch below which runs into latent issues when
building libjava (at least)...
/space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/libjava/java/lang/natClassLoader.cc: In
function ‘java::lang::Class* _Jv_FindClassInCache(_Jv_Utf8Const*)’:
On 10/07/15 12:35, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 10 July 2015 at 09:14, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 07/09/2015 05:39 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Some multilibs do not support Thumb mode on ARM targets. This is the
case for instance when target is arm-linux-gnueabihf and with
Hi,
On Fri, 10 Jul 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
I also noticed it but didn't care ;) But now I notice
switch (TREE_CODE (t))
{
case SSA_NAME:
cases are indented too much, it should be
switch (TREE_CODE (t))
{
case SSA_NAME:
I like the first one
Pinging this patch.
Thank you,
- Mantas
On 05/03/15 10:14, Mantas Mikaitis wrote:
Hello,
Tests gcc.target/arm/macro_defs0.c and gcc.target/arm/macro_defs1.c fail
in multilib which forces -marm as pointed out in this message:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00483.html .
This
On 10 July 2015 at 13:40, Ramana Radhakrishnan
ramana.radhakrish...@foss.arm.com wrote:
On 10/07/15 12:35, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 10 July 2015 at 09:14, Christian Bruel christian.br...@st.com wrote:
On 07/09/2015 05:39 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
Some multilibs do not support Thumb mode
On 7 July 2015 at 13:33, Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com wrote:
2015-07-06 Jiong Wang jiong.w...@arm.com
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_load_symref_appropriately): Mark mem as
READONLY and NOTRAP for PIC symbol.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/aarch64/got_mem_hoist.c: New
Hi Mantas,
On 13/02/15 10:03, Mantas Mikaitis wrote:
Hi all,
This is a backport for gcc-4_9-branch of the patch [PATCH][ARM]
__ARM_FP __ARM_NEON_FP defined when -march=armv7-m posted in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00250.html
arm-none-linux-gnueabi/hf tested without any
After looking into this some more, because the PR got reopened, there were
two issues: 1) __builtin_adjust_trampoline call needing a frame or chain (as
can be seen on the new testcases) that wasn't added to parallel/task/target
clauses 2) for !optimize, there is code to add those, when frame
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 2:19 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:57:31PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu,
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Richard Biener wrote:
This moves more patterns that show up during bootstrap.
Bootstrap and regtest running on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Due to regressions caused I split off the fold_plusminus_mult_expr
part.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,
Hi all,
This patch makes if-conversion more aggressive when handling code of the form:
if (test)
x := a //THEN
else
x := b //ELSE
Currently, we can handle this case only if x:=a and x:=b are simple single set
instructions.
With this patch we will be able to handle the cases where x:=a
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
As I wrote at
[PATCH, libcpp]: Use asm flag outputs in search_line_sse42 main loop
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg113610.html
I wont repeat myself with reasons summary is that current
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 11:26 AM, Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com wrote:
I've been threatening to do this for a couple of months, and now that the
regressions are under control I think it's time. This patch changes the
default C++ dialect to C++14.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 03:57:31PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 1:08 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 2:54 AM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 11:52 AM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu,
After posting the first testsuite results for DragonFly, it was clear
that the -fcilkplus functionality was broken:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-07/msg01046.html
The problem was related to the __cpu_model symbol not getting exported.
The solution was to create
On 07/11/2015 12:53 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I'mm working through the mkoffload machinery. mkoffload.c emits a C
file, and the quoting in the source is quite confusing. This patch
introduces a quoting macro 'Q' that allows one to write raw C to be
stringized and written out.
ok? (more
On 07/10/2015 02:47 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
I noticed a few annoying bits around the graphite files that I decided
to cleanup.
- omega.h shouldn't include config.h. including params.h is fine
since it is needed, but it should be within the #ifndef GCC_OMEGA_H guard.
- sese.h is required for
On 07/10/2015 06:34 PM, John Marino wrote:
After posting the first testsuite results for DragonFly, it was clear
that the -fcilkplus functionality was broken:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-07/msg01046.html
The problem was related to the __cpu_model symbol not getting exported.
Hi,
I have noticed that in the mips.exp dg-option handling code the isa and
arch_test_option_p variables are not updated after the pre-arch to arch
dependency handling. This means that if this code changes the
architecture the post-arch dependency handling code (which relies on
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:54 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
On 07/07/2015 10:29 AM, Jim Wilson wrote:
This is critically important as various parts of the compiler will take a
degenerate PHI node and propagate the RHS of the PHI into the uses of the
LHS of the PHI -- without doing any
Hello!
When using __readeflags, we have to prevent possible flag-clobbering
zero-extensions and make flag-setting operation persistent.
2015-07-10 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
PR target/66703
* gcc.target/i386/readeflags-1.c (readeflags_test): Declare with
On Tue, Jul 7, 2015 at 2:35 PM, Richard Biener
richard.guent...@gmail.com wrote:
On July 7, 2015 6:29:21 PM GMT+02:00, Jim Wilson jim.wil...@linaro.org
wrote:
signed sub-word locals. Thus to detect the need for a conversion, you
have to have the decls, and we don't have them here. There is
On 07/10/2015 04:09 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
The patch was bootstrapped and tested on x86/x86-64.
Committed as rev. 225618.
2015-07-09 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com
PR rtl-optimization/66782
* lra-int.h (struct
Hi everyone,
attached is a rather trivial patch to fix a linker issue when unlimited
polymorphism is used and the vtabs of intrinsic types are referenced from two
different locations (e.g. module and main program). Gfortran finds the vtab
defined in the scope of a module's subroutine and tries to
Hi all,
Some of the testcases in aarch64.exp can fail their scan-assembler patterns if
if-conversion becomes more aggressive.
This patch adjusts the testcases in case the branches are eliminated and
further optimisations occur that may remove the
scan-assembler patterns.
With this patch the
On 10/07/15 13:31, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
+ to compute a value for x. Put the rtx cost of the insns
+ in TEST_BB into COST. Record whether TEST_BB is a single simple
+ set instruction in SIMPLE_P. If the bb is not simple place all insns
+ except the last insn into SEQ. */
+
That
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Have you tried new SSE4.2 implementation (the one with asm flags) with
unrolled loop?
Also, the SSE4.2 implementation looks shorter, so more I-cache friendly,
so I
Yes, it should be closed. When I asked you to open it,
I thought the issue was a corner case in your patch.
--
steve
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:44:32AM +0200, Andre Vehreschild wrote:
this means that pr66775 is to be closed as resolved invalid, because the
current implementation is
With the attached patch, libatomic will build and pass 100% of the tests
on DragonFly.
suggested entry for libatomic/ChangeLog:
2015-07-XX John Marino gnu...@marino.st
* configure.tgt: Add *-*-dragonfly to supported targets.
Please consider this patch for trunk.
Thanks,
John
---
On 10/07/15 10:00, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2015, at 1:47 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 10/07/15 09:40, pins...@gmail.com wrote:
On Jul 10, 2015, at 1:34 AM, Kyrill Tkachov kyrylo.tkac...@arm.com wrote:
Hi all,
Currently when evaluating
Uros had the idea of using std::min/max instead of our MIN/MAX
macros defined in system.h. I thought I would do this cleanup,
but very soon I ran into a problem of failed template argument
substitution: std::min/max function templates require that both
arguments be of the same type:
Ping^5.
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 09:42:39AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping^4.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 10:08:51AM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
I'm pinging the C++ parts.
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 12:44:36PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Ping.
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 11:07:29AM
Hi,
I've spotted a likely typo:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Martin Liska wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-07-03 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* ipa-reference.c (ipa_ref_opt_summary_t): New class.
(get_reference_optimization_summary): Use it.
Hi,
I know the patch has been approved by Jeff, but please do not commit
it before considering the following:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:13:53AM +0200, Martin Liska wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-07-03 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* ipa-cp.c (struct edge_clone_summary): New structure.
bah. I forgot that tilepro generates 2 source file that are in the
source tree... so it overwrites any changes directly to the includes.
These probably ought to be generated into the build directory so this
isn't an issue. Although I suppose its probably only an issue for me
anyway :-P
Hi,
thanks for working on this and sorry for a tad late review:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:13:52AM +0200, Martin Liska wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2015-07-03 Martin Liska mli...@suse.cz
* cgraph.c (symbol_table::create_edge): Introduce summary_uid
for cgraph_edge.
*
On 07/09/2015 04:43 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
This final version which I agreed with Richard Sandiford.
Hope this can be finally installed to trunk?
Patch can bootstrap and survive regression tests on x86_64-linux-gnu.
FWIW, I confirmed this version of the patch fixes the build issues on
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 06:20:47PM +0200, Mikael Morin wrote:
I'm not completely convinced by the standard excerpts that have been
quoted about this topic, as they don't have any explicit mention of
allocatable variables/expressions.
I did not quote 12.3.3 about characteristics of function
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:10 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Indirect sibcall
On 07/09/2015 11:53 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 11:24:44AM -0700, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Thanks for working on it.
+ wide_int offset = wi::neg (addend, overflow);
+ addend = wide_int_to_tree (TREE_TYPE (addend), offset);
+ if
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:10 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register
available for
Hi Thomas!
On 07/09/2015 03:51 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Jim!
On Tue, 7 Jul 2015 10:19:39 -0500, James Norris jnor...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
This patch fixes an issue where the deviceptr clause in an outer
directive was being ignored during implicit variable definition
on a nested
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-06/msg00075.html
Le 21/06/2015 11:48, Mikael Morin a écrit :
Le 16/05/2015 18:43, Mikael Morin a écrit :
Hello,
this is about PR61831 where in code like:
type :: string_t
character(LEN=1), dimension(:), allocatable :: chars
hello Andre.
Le 06/07/2015 13:54, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
Hi all,
please find attached the next version of the patch for pr66035 fixing an ICE.
Scope (copied from first submit):
An ICE occurred when in a structure constructor an allocatable component of
type class was initialized
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 10:17 PM, Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 09, 2015 at 10:13:49PM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
I was under impression that peephole2 pass doesn't see subregs of hard
regs (all x86 predicates are written in this way). Even documentation
somehow agrees with
Hello all,
I'm not completely convinced by the standard excerpts that have been
quoted about this topic, as they don't have any explicit mention of
allocatable variables/expressions.
For what it's worth, in my opinion, the handling of allocatable that was
proposed by Andre makes sense to me.
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register
available for argument passing.
OK for trunk if there is no regression?
H.J.
---
gcc/
PR target/66819
* config/i386/i386.c
ira-lives.c and lra-lives.c both define the same function named
bb_has_abnormal_call_pred. I think let's factor out this function to
basic-block.h where it really belongs.
Bootstrap/regtest running on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk if it passes?
2015-07-10 Marek Polacek pola...@redhat.com
Le 10/07/2015 16:51, Andre Vehreschild a écrit :
Hi everyone,
attached is a rather trivial patch to fix a linker issue when unlimited
polymorphism is used and the vtabs of intrinsic types are referenced from two
different locations (e.g. module and main program). Gfortran finds the vtab
Hi Mikael, hi all,
I only had the chance to check with ifort (different versions; including the
most recent one) and that compiler is consistent with gfortran as it is now,
I.e., the executable segfaults after the function has been called.
I am though curious what other compilers opinion on
Hi,
in this rather old issue, we fail to include explicit constructors in
the second step of a copy-initialization and the below is rejected. I'm
not 100% sure, but using the existing comments as a guide, I think I
found the place where we wrongly set LOOKUP_ONLYCONVERTING for the
second
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 12:54 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
Indirect sibcall with register arguments is OK when there is register
available for argument passing.
OK for trunk if there is no regression?
H.J.
---
OK.
Jason
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 03:19:10PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote:
Uros had the idea of using std::min/max instead of our MIN/MAX
macros defined in system.h. I thought I would do this cleanup,
but very soon I ran into a problem of failed template argument
substitution: std::min/max function
noticed obstack.h was being included in a few files which already
include backend.h, so its redundant. Just taking them out.
Bootstraps on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, with no new regressions.
finishing up a config-list.mk using targets from the changes just to be
sure.
OK for trunk assuming
On 07/10/2015 07:25 AM, Ondřej Bílka wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 12:43:48PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 11:37:18AM +0200, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Have you tried new SSE4.2 implementation (the one with asm flags) with
unrolled loop?
Also, the SSE4.2 implementation looks
We need to skip the constexpr default constructors.
That's actually not sufficient so I have installed the attached patch instead.
Tested on x86_64-suse-linux, applied on the mainline as obvious.
2015-07-10 Eric Botcazou ebotca...@adacore.com
c-family/
* c-ada-spec.h
On 07/10/2015 10:09 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
ira-lives.c and lra-lives.c both define the same function named
bb_has_abnormal_call_pred. I think let's factor out this function to
basic-block.h where it really belongs.
Bootstrap/regtest running on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk if it passes?
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:58 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 10:21 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 7:10 PM, H.J. Lu hjl.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 9:30 AM, Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9,
Hi Thomas,
On 07/09/2015 03:29 AM, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
Hi Jim!
On Wed, 8 Jul 2015 13:00:16 -0500, James Norris jnor...@codesourcery.com
wrote:
This patch adds handling of the deviceptr clause when
used within a Fortran program.
Please motivate such non-obvious code changes by a test
On 07/10/2015 02:19 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
But the warning on the bogus line will still be warranted, so user goes and
fixes it.
But when the user gets the bogus line, he may look at the code and
determine that the reported line can't possibly be executed -- so they
get confused, assume
On 07/10/2015 01:49 PM, Andrew MacLeod wrote:
noticed obstack.h was being included in a few files which already
include backend.h, so its redundant. Just taking them out.
Bootstraps on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, with no new regressions.
finishing up a config-list.mk using targets from the
Looking at the concepts work led me to notice this bug: we weren't
finding packs used only in variable template-ids.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 29ae93b90171f5202ec1de7507b77d09b2dff643
Author: Jason Merrill ja...@redhat.com
Date: Fri Jul 10 15:27:11 2015 -0400
Andrew Bennett andrew.benn...@imgtec.com writes:
I have noticed that in the mips.exp dg-option handling code the isa and
arch_test_option_p variables are not updated after the pre-arch to arch
dependency handling. This means that if this code changes the
architecture the post-arch dependency
I've committed this patch to fix a df verify crash Thomas pointed me at.
Thomas, I think this means you can revert the workaround you just committed?
nathan
2015-07-10 Nathan Sidwell nat...@codesourcery.com
* config/nvptx/nvptx.c (nvptx_reorg): Move df problem setting, set
On 07/09/2015 10:48 PM, Mikhail Maltsev wrote:
On 08.07.2015 13:55, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I don't know of anybody who actually uses the DMGL_TYPES support. I
don't know why anybody would.
Ian
Thanks for pointing that out. I updated the testcases, so that now they
don't depend on DMGL_TYPES
I noticed a few annoying bits around the graphite files that I decided
to cleanup.
- omega.h shouldn't include config.h. including params.h is fine
since it is needed, but it should be within the #ifndef GCC_OMEGA_H guard.
- sese.h is required for compilation of graphite-poly.h, and basically
On Fri, Jul 10, 2015 at 01:21:05PM +0100, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
Some of the testcases in aarch64.exp can fail their scan-assembler patterns
if if-conversion becomes more aggressive.
This patch adjusts the testcases in case the branches are eliminated and
further optimisations occur
On 07/09/2015 05:08 PM, Kugan wrote:
Done. Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86-64-none-linux-gnu with
no new regressions. Is this OK for trunk?
Thanks for the additional testcases.
+ else
+{
+ /* If arg1 is an INTEGER_CST, fold it to new type. */
+ if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P
I've committed this patch to remove library versions of the num threads and
thread id. This has been busted since my reorg of the tid and ntid builtins,
but wasn't noticed because they're not used anyway.
nathan
2015-07-10 Nathan Sidwell nat...@codesourcery.com
*
Bernd,
I'mm working through the mkoffload machinery. mkoffload.c emits a C file, and
the quoting in the source is quite confusing. This patch introduces a quoting
macro 'Q' that allows one to write raw C to be stringized and written out.
ok? (more cleanups to follow)
nathan
2015-07-10
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
