The compiler correctly detects and diagnoses invalid constructor calls
such as C::C () in a non-template context but it fails to do so while
processing a class template. [ Section 3.4.3.1 of the standard is what
makes these forms of constructor calls illegal -- see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sho
pr69454-2.c needs -msse2 -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args to fail. Checked
into trunk.
H.J.
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 233165)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2016-02-04 H.J. Lu
+
+ * gcc.tar
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:33 PM, Pat Haugen wrote:
> The following patch fixes a few insns that were specifying an incorrect
> 'type' attribute.
>
> Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
>
> -Pat
>
>
> 2016-02-04 Pat Haugen
>
> * config/rs6000/crypto
The following patch fixes a few insns that were specifying an incorrect
'type' attribute.
Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
-Pat
2016-02-04 Pat Haugen
* config/rs6000/crypto.md (crypto_vpermxor_): Correct
insn type.
* config/rs60
From: Trevor Saunders
Hi,
We can tell git to highlight whitespace errors in diffs, and if you enable the
default pre-commit hook git won't allow you to make a commit with a whitespace
error violating the rules you told it about. These files as are could be
improved some, they don't enforce whi
On 04/02/16 22:41 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 04/02/16 17:31 -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
On 2016-02-04 5:11 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
In file included from .././../gcc-6-20160131/gcc/genautomata.c:116:0:
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc6-devel/work/gcc-6-20160131/libstdc++-v3/include/c_comp
When r230324 split the GLIBCXX_ENABLE_C99 configure checks to test
everything twice, once with -std=gnu++98 and once with -std=gnu++11,
we failed to check the stdlib.h functions with gnu++98. As a result
_GLIBCXX98_USE_C99_STDLIB was never defined, and so various C99
functions disappeared from nam
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:32:08AM +, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> As it happens the patch I did over a year ago for PR64682 isn't quite
> correct. This is PR69567. This fixes it.
>
> Tested on the separate testcases; also did bootstrap + testsuite on
> powerpc64-linux and x86_64-linux. I'll
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, the convert_scalars_to_vector hunk is important,
without that we e.g. miscompile simplify-rtx.c.
The following patch restores that hunk and extends disabling of TARGET_STV
also for the 64-bit, but not 128-bit, aligned preferred or incoming stack
boundaries (also non-def
Minor bug, fixed, committed.
* config/msp430/msp430.c (msp430_start_function): Add function type.
2016-02-04 Uros Bizjak
Index: config/msp430/msp430.c
===
--- config/msp430/msp430.c (revision 233155)
+++ config/msp
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:12 AM, Lynn A. Boger
wrote:
> Should the libgo version number be updated?
Thanks for the reminder. Done like so. Committed to mainline.
Ian
Index: gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE
===
--- gcc/go/gofrontend/MERGE
On 04/02/16 23:11 +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
It seems to break older versions of FreeBSD that have GCC 4.2
as their system compiler. (Those versions aren't actually all
that old, they are stuck with GCC 4.2 as the last version under
GPLv2.)
The version of GCC doesn't matter, it's whether lib
On 04/02/16 17:31 -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
On 2016-02-04 5:11 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
In file included from .././../gcc-6-20160131/gcc/genautomata.c:116:0:
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc6-devel/work/gcc-6-20160131/libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/math.h:65:12:
error: 'constexpr bool st
On 02/05/2016 08:59 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
This version fails to fall through to the next code block when
(1) Both types are pointers,
(2) Both types have the same address space,
which will do the wrong thing when
(3) The pointers have different modes.
Recall that several ports allow
On 2016-02-04 5:11 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
In file included from .././../gcc-6-20160131/gcc/genautomata.c:116:0:
/wrkdirs/usr/ports/lang/gcc6-devel/work/gcc-6-20160131/libstdc++-v3/include/c_compatibility/math.h:65:12:
error: 'constexpr bool std::isinf(double)' conflicts with a previous declara
In gcc 5 and earlier, struct diagnostic_info had a field:
unsigned int override_column;
which could be set by the macro:
diagnostic_override_column
This was only used by the frontends' callbacks for handling errors
from libcpp: c_cpp_error for the c-family, and cb_cpp_error for Fortran:
if (
On 02/04/2016 07:42 AM, Jeremy Bennett wrote:
The attached patch corrects some errors in documentation of the --param
option to gcc. Mostly they are corrections to the names of options,
but two parameters are documented which do not exist in trunk.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi (Opt
On Thu, 28 Jan 2016, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 27/01/16 19:49 -0500, John David Anglin wrote:
>> The attached patch fixes a stage1 build error compiling genautomata.c
>> on hpux. We need to test for obsolete XOPEN declarations of isinf and
>> isnan on hpux. Further, we need to check individua
On February 4, 2016 9:28:22 PM GMT+01:00, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>Richard Biener writes:
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Eric Botcazou
> wrote:
So this doesn’t fix aarch64, c6x, epiphany, ia64, iq2000, rs6000,
>rx, sparc,
tilegx, tilepro or xtensa.
:-( That’s one of the pro
Hello world,
For a type 'foo', we use a symtree 'Foo'. This led to accept-invalid
when a variable name was already declared as a type. This rather
self-explanatory patch fixes that.
Regression-tested. OK for trunk and 5? (Do we still care about 4.9?)
Regards
Thomas
2016-02-03 Tho
On February 4, 2016 10:04:47 PM GMT+01:00, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>On 02/04/2016 10:07 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Richard Henderson
>wrote:
>>> On 02/04/2016 07:30 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/04/2016 12:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
On February 4, 2016 8:50:58 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>As discussed on IRC and in the PR, get_ref_base_and_extent has
>a big while (1) which can be only left with goto done;, so code
>in between the end of that loop and the done: label is unreachable.
>If the base is *MEM_REF, we
Some minor doc updates.
Committed to trunk.
commit e7a4324d0f8bb8bd622e1412b7daf8b8a2d91430
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date: Thu Feb 4 21:41:31 2016 +
Update copyright years in libstdc++ manual and add link
* doc/xml/manual/containers.xml: Add cross-reference to Dual ABI.
On Thu, 4 Feb 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> If an enum has mode attribute, then finish_enum uses the precision
> from its mode (and complains if the enumerators don't fit into that
> precision), but will use TYPE_{MIN,MAX}_VALUE from int's precision instead.
>
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped
On 02/04/2016 02:10 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/04/2016 03:22 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
+ /* Refers to the declared object that constains the subobject
referenced
+ by OPER. When the object is initialized, makes it possible to
determine
+ the actual size of a flexible array member use
On 02/04/2016 03:22 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
+ /* Refers to the declared object that constains the subobject referenced
+ by OPER. When the object is initialized, makes it possible to determine
+ the actual size of a flexible array member used as the buffer passed
+ as OPER to placem
On 02/04/2016 10:07 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/04/2016 07:30 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 02/04/2016 12:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
As for a patch I'd repeatedly pondered on not stripping int <-> pointer
conversions at all,
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 3:39 PM, Michael Meissner
wrote:
> This patch fixes a bug where LRA would abort when compiling a C++ program with
> -mlra. I tracked this down to using the "ws" constraint for TFmode, TDmode,
> and IFmode, but those types are limited to just the traditional floating point
>
On 02/05/2016 07:07 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Adding forgotten CCs...
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
After PR rtl-optimization/69577 fix went in, it looks that we can
remove various kludges involving SSE and MMX register classes from
ix86_cannot_change_mode_class.
201
This patch fixes a bug where LRA would abort when compiling a C++ program with
-mlra. I tracked this down to using the "ws" constraint for TFmode, TDmode,
and IFmode, but those types are limited to just the traditional floating point
registers (ws on power8 targets all of the VSX registers).
With
Richard Biener writes:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> So this doesn’t fix aarch64, c6x, epiphany, ia64, iq2000, rs6000, rx, sparc,
>>> tilegx, tilepro or xtensa.
>>> :-( That’s one of the problems by having each port copy and paste swaths of
>>> :code from other port
On 02/04/2016 12:17 PM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
In this PR, we have, at an intermediate stage during LRA (before
create_cands):
(insn 420 (set (reg:HI 276 [orig:132 g.2_118 ] [132])
(reg:HI 132 [ g.2_118 ])) 88 {*movhi_internal}
(nil))
[]
(insn 436 (set (reg/v:HI 290 [orig:87 g ]
The attached patch implements the changes to the warning we
discussed in IRC yesterday.
With the patch GCC is by default silent about the test case in
bug 69662 and diagnoses it only with -Wplacement-new=2. Arrays
of other sizes and statically allocated objects are diagnosed
as before.
Tested o
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 10:13:21PM -0500, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> Thanks, Mike. I found it when trying to fix numerous LRA failures
> on power8. Reload pass when can not figure out what to do with
> illegitimate address does nothing. LRA tried still to do something.
> I've made LRA working as
Adding forgotten CCs...
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 8:49 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
> After PR rtl-optimization/69577 fix went in, it looks that we can
> remove various kludges involving SSE and MMX register classes from
> ix86_cannot_change_mode_class.
>
> 2016-02-04 Uros Bizjak
>
> PR
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, it seems reshape_init isn't prepared to be called
on the result of earlier reshape_init call, but since the recent Paolo's
changes expand_default_init can call it the second time.
The following patch attempts to narrow it down to the case where it
has not been called y
Hi!
If an enum has mode attribute, then finish_enum uses the precision
from its mode (and complains if the enumerators don't fit into that
precision), but will use TYPE_{MIN,MAX}_VALUE from int's precision instead.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
trunk?
Hi!
As discussed on IRC and in the PR, get_ref_base_and_extent has
a big while (1) which can be only left with goto done;, so code
in between the end of that loop and the done: label is unreachable.
If the base is *MEM_REF, we already set maxsize to -1, and for decls
it really shouldn't be needed,
Hello!
After PR rtl-optimization/69577 fix went in, it looks that we can
remove various kludges involving SSE and MMX register classes from
ix86_cannot_change_mode_class.
2016-02-04 Uros Bizjak
PR rtl-optimization/69577
Revert:
2015-10-29 Richard Henderson
PR target/68124
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:02 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 9:11 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 05:09:34PM +0300, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>> And it's too late to do it after STV pass and therefore we disable it
>>> when stack is not properly aligned.
On Feb 4, 2016, at 10:23 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Yes, I sure did! (But no, it wasn't obvious to me. I recently
> upgraded this machine and did it differently than I normally do,
> so things are, well, different than I expected. FWIW, it would
> be nice to mention this as the first step at the
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
>
> On 04/02/16 09:13, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> PR target/65932 is a wrong-code bug affecting arm and has manifested
>>> itself
>>> when compiling the L
On 02/04/2016 12:24 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/04/2016 10:32 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/03/2016 12:51 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
+ && (integer_minus_onep (lhs)
+
On Thu, 2016-02-04 at 12:09 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > So this doesn’t fix aarch64, c6x, epiphany, ia64, iq2000, rs6000, rx, sparc,
> > tilegx, tilepro or xtensa.
> > :-( That’s one of the problems by having each port copy and paste swaths of
> > :code from other ports to express the same thi
On 02/04/2016 10:39 AM, Mike Stump wrote:
On Feb 4, 2016, at 7:32 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
FWIW, I keep having trouble with the repository.
$ svn switch --relocate svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc
svn+ssh://mse...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc
svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL
'svn+ssh:
On Feb 4, 2016, at 7:32 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> FWIW, I keep having trouble with the repository.
> $ svn switch --relocate svn://gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc
> svn+ssh://mse...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc
> svn: E170013: Unable to connect to a repository at URL
> 'svn+ssh://mse...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk'
>
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:24 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>> On 02/04/2016 10:32 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/03/2016 12:51 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
>
> +
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 02/04/2016 10:32 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/03/2016 12:51 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
+ && (integer_minus_onep (lhs)
+ || integer_
In this PR, we have, at an intermediate stage during LRA (before
create_cands):
(insn 420 (set (reg:HI 276 [orig:132 g.2_118 ] [132])
(reg:HI 132 [ g.2_118 ])) 88 {*movhi_internal}
(nil))
[]
(insn 436 (set (reg/v:HI 290 [orig:87 g ] [87])
(reg/v:HI 87 [ g ]))
(insn 14 (
On 04/02/16 17:12, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
Hi all,
As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
aarch64 port
to emit a .arch assembly directive for each function that describes the
architectural features
used b
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 5:50 AM, Kyrill Tkachov
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
> aarch64 port
> to emit a .arch assembly directive for each function that describes the
> architectural features
> used by that function. This is a cha
On 02/04/2016 04:14 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/04/2016 10:02 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
>>> Do we need matching __auto_type variants?
>>
>> I think at present __auto_type removes the qualifiers from atomic types only,
>> but I'd hope we can just adjust __auto_type to always strip the qualif
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 05:46:27PM +0300, Yuri Rumyantsev wrote:
> Here is a patch that cures the issues with non-correct vuse for scalar
> statements during code motion, i.e. if vuse of scalar statement is
> vdef of masked store which has been sunk to new basic block, we must
> fix it up. The pat
On 02/04/2016 09:38 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/04/2016 10:32 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
FWIW, I keep having trouble with the repository. Git doesn't
work to check things in at all
The instructions here aren't working for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GitMirror#Commit_upstream_.28git-svn.29
This patch fixes a problem introduced with the GPR into FPR slot save
feature for leaf functions.
r6 is argument register as well as call-saved. Currently we might
decide that it will be a candidate for being saved into an FPR. If it
turns out later that r6 also needs to be saved due to being re
On 02/04/2016 10:32 AM, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 02/03/2016 12:51 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
+ && (integer_minus_onep (lhs)
+ || integer_minus_onep (rhs)))
Let's use null_member_pointer_value_p here.
Done.
Please ad
On 02/04/2016 10:32 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
FWIW, I keep having trouble with the repository. Git doesn't
work to check things in at all
The instructions here aren't working for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GitMirror#Commit_upstream_.28git-svn.29
and I have only one svn repository
that does
On 02/04/2016 09:09 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
We've already been asked to add something like __typeof_noqual, e.g.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39985#c3 . In a similar PR,
I wanted to modify __typeof to drop all qualifiers, but Joseph suggested
instead to add a new typeof variant:
Marcin KoÅcielnicki wrote:
> Fair enough. Here's what I'm going to implement in gold:
>
> - any PLT relocation: call
> - PC32DBL on a larl: non-call
> - PC32DBL otherwise: call
> - any other relocation: non-call
>
> Does that sound right?
Hmm, I'm wondering about the PC32DBL choices. There a
On 02/04/2016 10:02 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
Do we need matching __auto_type variants?
I think at present __auto_type removes the qualifiers from atomic types only,
but I'd hope we can just adjust __auto_type to always strip the qualifiers,
not introduce __auto_type_noqual...
Exactly what I w
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:31:27AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> The jit testsuite was showing numerous segfaults and fatal
> errors for trunk on aarch64; typically on the 2nd iteration of each
> test, with errors like:
> test-volatile.c.exe: fatal error: pass ‘rnreg’ not found but is referenced
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 9:24 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 02/03/2016 12:51 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
>>
>> + && (integer_minus_onep (lhs)
>> + || integer_minus_onep (rhs)))
>
>
> Let's use null_member_pointer_value_p here.
Done.
>
> Please add pointers to member functions to t
On 02/04/2016 04:05 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:21:04PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
2016-02-02 Martin Sebor
PR c++/69251
PR c++/69253
PR c++/69290
PR c++/69277
PR c++/69349
* class.c (walk_subobject_offs
On 04/02/16 16:06, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Marcin Kościelnicki wrote:
Ugh. I take that back. For -fPIC, the load-address sequence is:
larl%r1,f@GOTENT
lg %r2,0(%r1)
br %r14
This is correct.
And (sibling) call sequence is:
larl%r1,f
The jit testsuite was showing numerous segfaults and fatal
errors for trunk on aarch64; typically on the 2nd iteration of each
test, with errors like:
test-volatile.c.exe: fatal error: pass ‘rnreg’ not found but is referenced by
new pass ‘whole-program’
where the new pass' name varies, and can be
Marcin KoÅcielnicki wrote:
> Ugh. I take that back. For -fPIC, the load-address sequence is:
>
> larl%r1,f@GOTENT
> lg %r2,0(%r1)
> br %r14
This is correct.
> And (sibling) call sequence is:
>
> larl%r1,f@GOTENT
> lg %r1,0(%
On Feb 4, 2016, at 5:46 AM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
wrote:
> When running the regression testsuite for the AVR target, I noticed a
> bunch of sso tests failing
> If this patch is ok, could someone commit please?
The patch is Ok.
I don’t recall a target supports for I/O. So, I/O is incredible
Hi!
On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:31:35 +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> On 01/22/2016 02:25 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> > What about #pragma oacc parallel? That would never do that?
>
> It shouldn't, no (IMO).
Correct.
Here is the patch re-worked for trunk. Instead of passing
-foffload-force in th
Hi All,
Here is a patch that cures the issues with non-correct vuse for scalar
statements during code motion, i.e. if vuse of scalar statement is
vdef of masked store which has been sunk to new basic block, we must
fix it up. The patch also fixed almost all remarks pointed out by
Jacub.
Bootstra
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The attached patch corrects some errors in documentation of the --param
option to gcc. Mostly they are corrections to the names of options,
but two parameters are documented which do not exist in trunk.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* doc/invoke.texi (Optim
On 02/03/2016 12:51 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
+ && (integer_minus_onep (lhs)
+ || integer_minus_onep (rhs)))
Let's use null_member_pointer_value_p here.
Please add pointers to member functions to the testcase.
Jason
On 02/03/2016 10:07 PM, Patrick Palka wrote:
It just occurred to me that issuing this warning during template
instantiation may be undesirable if the dynamic_cast being built was
originally dependent (for the same reasons it is undesirable to issue
-Wuseless-cast warnings during instantiation, wh
Should the libgo version number be updated?
On 02/03/2016 03:58 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
I've committed a patch to the libgo library to update it to Go 1.6rc1,
the first release candidate for the Go 1.6 release. As usual with
major libgo updates, the change is too large to include here. I'v
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 02:42:38PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:40:22AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:34:17PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> > >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jakub
Hi all,
As part of the target attributes and pragmas support for GCC 6 I changed the
aarch64 port
to emit a .arch assembly directive for each function that describes the
architectural features
used by that function. This is a change from GCC 5 behaviour where we output a
single .arch directiv
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 02:27:34PM +, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In this PR we ICE during combine when trying to propagate a comparison into a
> vec_duplicate,
> that is we end up creating the rtx:
> (vec_duplicate:V4SI (eq:CC_NZ (reg:CC_NZ 66 cc)
> (const_int 0 [0])))
>
> T
Hi,
When running the regression testsuite for the AVR target, I noticed a
bunch of sso tests failing - turns out they assume sizeof(int) == 4.
This patch marks them UNSUPPORTED for targets that don't match that
assumption, by requiring effective-target int32.
A few tests still run and
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 08:40:22AM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:34:17PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >> > Hi!
> >> >
> >> > rs6000_expand_atomic_compare_a
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:33 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:34:17PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > Hi!
>> >
>> > rs6000_expand_atomic_compare_and_swap uses oldval directly in
>> > a comparison instruction, but oldval mi
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>>> OTOH, does this testcase even gets a chance to run?
>>
>> It's not a runtime check.
>
> But it didn't link until today:
>
> Running /opt/gcc/gcc-20160203/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sancov/sancov.exp ...
> Executing on host: /opt/gcc/gcc-20160203
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 01:01:10PM +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
[...]
> After you mentioned this on IRC I wrote the following. I think yours
> is probably a bit simpler to read and so better, but is it worth
> taking the "unless a base class or member variable has a destructor
> that is noexcept(f
On 04/02/16 13:37 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote:
I spotted these two issues in real-world code when doing Fedora mass
rebuild. It's C++ and so I don't really know what I'm talking about;
Jon, could you please look at this?
Thanks,
Index: porting_to.html
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>>> So this doesn’t fix aarch64, c6x, epiphany, ia64, iq2000, rs6000, rx, sparc,
>>> tilegx, tilepro or xtensa.
>>> :-( That’s one of the problems by having each port copy and paste swat
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Alan Lawrence
wrote:
> On 04/02/16 09:53, Dominik Vogt wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:41:02AM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>>>
>>> On 26/01/16 12:23, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:13:28PM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>
> ..
Andreas Schwab writes:
> Uros Bizjak writes:
>
>> OTOH, does this testcase even gets a chance to run?
>
> It's not a runtime check.
But it didn't link until today:
Running /opt/gcc/gcc-20160203/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sancov/sancov.exp ...
Executing on host: /opt/gcc/gcc-20160203/Build/gcc/xgcc
On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 12:09 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> So this doesn’t fix aarch64, c6x, epiphany, ia64, iq2000, rs6000, rx, sparc,
>> tilegx, tilepro or xtensa.
>> :-( That’s one of the problems by having each port copy and paste swaths of
>> :code from other ports to express the same thing in
Uros Bizjak writes:
> OTOH, does this testcase even gets a chance to run?
It's not a runtime check.
Running /opt/gcc/gcc-20160204/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/sancov/sancov.exp ...
Executing on host: /opt/gcc/gcc-20160204/Build/gcc/xgcc
-B/opt/gcc/gcc-20160204/Build/gcc/ fsanitize_addres
On 03/02/16 18:27, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
Marcin Kościelnicki wrote:
libgcc/ChangeLog:
* config.host: Use t-stack and t-stack-s390 for s390*-*-linux.
* config/s390/morestack.S: New file.
* config/s390/t-stack-s390: New file.
* generic-morestack.c (__splitstack_f
I spotted these two issues in real-world code when doing Fedora mass
rebuild. It's C++ and so I don't really know what I'm talking about;
Jon, could you please look at this?
Thanks,
Index: porting_to.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwd
A previous patch required -march=z13 in ssa-dom-cse-2.c for s390
and s390x, but actually only s390x really needs it. The attached
patch removes the extra option on s390 (and fixes comment
formatting).
Ciao
Dominik ^_^ ^_^
--
Dominik Vogt
IBM Germany
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
* gcc.dg/
> +}]
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> This is just weird. What if fsanitize_address effective target is used
>>>> outside of asan/ (i.e. without asan_init first) ?
>>>
>>> It won't work, you also need various lin
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the German team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/de.po
(This file, 'cpplib-6.1-b20160131.
tize_address effective target is used
>>> outside of asan/ (i.e. without asan_init first) ?
>>
>> It won't work, you also need various link flags that are part of
>> TEST_ALWAYS_FLAGS.
>
> That breaks gcc.dg/sancov/asan.c.
>
> Running /usr/local/gcc/gcc-20160204
On 04/02/16 09:53, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 11:41:02AM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
On 26/01/16 12:23, Dominik Vogt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 01:13:28PM +, Alan Lawrence wrote:
...the test passes with --param sra-max-scalarization-size-Ospeed.
Verified on aarch64 an
On Wed, Feb 03, 2016 at 05:34:17PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 5:28 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > rs6000_expand_atomic_compare_and_swap uses oldval directly in
> > a comparison instruction, but oldval might be a CONST_INT not suitable
> > for the instruction (s
On 04/02/16 11:04, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 12:14 PM, Alan Lawrence wrote:
>> This cleans up the neon_reinterpret code on ARM in a similar way to AArch64.
>> Rather than a builtin backing onto an expander that emits a mov insn, we can
>> just use a cast, because GCC de
return 0; }
>>> -} "-fsanitize=address"]
>>> +}]
>>> }
>>>
>>
>> This is just weird. What if fsanitize_address effective target is used
>> outside of asan/ (i.e. without asan_init first) ?
>
> It won't work, you als
> So this doesn’t fix aarch64, c6x, epiphany, ia64, iq2000, rs6000, rx, sparc,
> tilegx, tilepro or xtensa.
> :-( That’s one of the problems by having each port copy and paste swaths of
> :code from other ports to express the same thing instead of ports sharing
> :just one copy of code. My port i
On Wed, Feb 3, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 02/04/2016 07:30 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>>
>> On 02/04/2016 12:46 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>
>>> As for a patch I'd repeatedly pondered on not stripping int <-> pointer
>>> conversions at all, similar to what STRIP_SIGN_NOPS d
On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 06:21:04PM -0700, Martin Sebor wrote:
> gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
> 2016-02-02 Martin Sebor
>
> PR c++/69251
> PR c++/69253
> PR c++/69290
> PR c++/69277
> PR c++/69349
> * class.c (walk_subobject_offsets): Avoid testing the upper bound
>
1 - 100 of 116 matches
Mail list logo
