On 02/25/2017 11:54 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
On 25 February 2017 at 14:43, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch deletes calls to strdup, strndup if it's
return-value is unused,
and same for realloc if the first
On 2017-02-25, at 5:32 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, John David Anglin wrote:
>>> Sooo, why not deprecate 32-bit HP-UX with GCC 7?
>> GCC 7 is in reasonable shape on 32-bit HP-UX. I'll do it after it is
>> released.
>
> If you deprecate it with GCC 7, it'd be only removed
In an arithmetic directive with the width or precision specified
by an argument to the asterisk (e.g., "%*x") and where the argument
range is unknown, for the purposes of the return value optimization
the pass must assume it's potentially as large as INT_MAX. But for
the purposes of issuing a
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, John David Anglin wrote:
>> Sooo, why not deprecate 32-bit HP-UX with GCC 7?
> GCC 7 is in reasonable shape on 32-bit HP-UX. I'll do it after it is
> released.
If you deprecate it with GCC 7, it'd be only removed with GCC 8.
On the other hand, if you deprecate it past GCC
Hi Gerald,
> On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> - >> href="http://www.tru64unix.compaq.com/docs/base_doc/DOCUMENTATION/V51_HTML/SUPPDOCS/OBJSPEC/TITLE.HTM;>
>>> - Information on the Digital UNIX/Compaq Tru64 UNIX object file
>>> format
>>> -
>> while the HTML link on
>>
On 2017-02-25, at 12:25 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, John David Anglin wrote:
>>> It's really hard to make an argument to do anything other than deprecate
>>> that platform. Given John's ongoing involvement it's much harder to
>>> deprecate 64bit linux (and consequently 64bit
On Wed, 8 Feb 2017, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> - > href="http://www.tru64unix.compaq.com/docs/base_doc/DOCUMENTATION/V51_HTML/SUPPDOCS/OBJSPEC/TITLE.HTM;>
>> - Information on the Digital UNIX/Compaq Tru64 UNIX object file
>> format
>> -
> while the HTML link on
>
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> And here is what I applied for GCC 5.
Except that I fixed some things, but failed to remove the duplicate id.
Applied as a follow-up.
Gerald
Index: gcc-5/changes.html
===
RCS file:
With this, the number of problematic links on readings.html is
down to a single digit -- a first in many, many years... :-)
Applied.
Gerald
Index: readings.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/readings.html,v
retrieving
HTML and PDF formats should be sufficient, and the early C Reference
Manual is just one of many other document on Dennis Ritchie's page,
for anyone interested.
Applied.
Gerald
Index: readings.html
===
RCS file:
The attached change fixes PR target/68739. As noted in comment #2, the
standard for libstdc++
requires a constexpr constructor for mutexes. On hpux, we don't have a
constexpr constructor because of
of the void * casts in the PTHREAD_MUTEX_INITIALIZER define and the void *
element in the
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Below is what I just applied.
And here is what I applied for GCC 5.
Gerald
Index: changes.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-5/changes.html,v
retrieving revision 1.143
diff
On 25 February 2017 at 14:43, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> The attached patch deletes calls to strdup, strndup if it's
>> return-value is unused,
>> and same for realloc if the first arg is NULL.
>> Bootstrap+tested on
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Marek Polacek wrote:
> Fixed.
Here is a small follow-up patch that I applied on top of this.
It uses , improves markup, and simplifies language a bit.
(Note that if we have "member" is a meta-variable, then we also need
to mark it up as "member" whenever we refer to it.)
After applying the change to document removal of the pcommit instruction
with GCC 6.3, I noticed the levels of headings were inconsistent, that is,
subheadings had the same level () as their parent.
In the past we did not run into this since we usually did not have much
to document for minor
On Wed, 12 Oct 2016, John David Anglin wrote:
>> It's really hard to make an argument to do anything other than deprecate
>> that platform. Given John's ongoing involvement it's much harder to
>> deprecate 64bit linux (and consequently 64bit hpux).
> I believe that deprecating the 32-bit HP-UX
On Wed, 22 Feb 2017, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
> 2017-02-22 Xi Ruoyao
>
> * doc/invoke.texi (Warning Options): Document -Wstring-plus-int
In principle this looks fine, but...
> +@item -Wstring-plus-int
> +@opindex Wstring-plus-int
> +@opindex Wno-string-plus-int
> +Warn
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 02:29:12PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> there still was one piece missing for the new matmul library
> version. To make sure that users (usually) benefit, we need
> to call the library by default up from a certain limit.
> The attached patch does that, with a limit of
On Tue, 21 Feb 2017, Martin Jambor wrote:
> I see, I suppose we should be consistent, I will commit the following,
> which I have included in a bootstrap and test run on x86_64-linux.
Do you also plan to add a note to gcc-7/changes.html? I think that
would make sense.
Gerald
On Wed, 7 Dec 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>> But how to update changes for upcoming GCC 6.3 (and future GCC 5.5)?
>> There are corresponding documents at [1] and [2], please add a "GCC
>> 6.3" or "GCC 5.5" entry with "Target Specific Changes" at the end of
>> the documents.
>>
>> [1]
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the French team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/fr.po
(This file, 'gcc-7.1-b20170101.fr.po',
Hi Vladimir
On Mon, 31 Oct 2016, Vladimir N Makarov wrote:
> I've created a new branch ira-select for work on experimental
> algorithm of calculations of pseudo register classes.
did you mean to also add this to gcc.gnu.org/svn.html ? That's
where we generally document such branches.
Thanks,
...which apparently has gone the way of the dodo.
Applied.
Gerald
Index: readings.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/readings.html,v
retrieving revision 1.263
diff -u -r1.263 readings.html
--- readings.html 25 Feb
In doc/sourcebuild.texi we have @xref{Standard Targets, , Standard Targets
for...} which leads to a broken link in
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Front-End-Makefile.html since
gcc.gnu.org does not carry a copy of the GNU Coding Standards.
Instead let's refer to the version on www.gnu.org
Applied.
(Let's see how long this lasts...)
Gerald
Index: readings.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/readings.html,v
retrieving revision 1.262
diff -u -r1.262 readings.html
--- readings.html 23 Feb 2017 14:21:12
Applied, and while I was at it, also changed the link text from
"here" to "libstdc++ manual".
Gerald
Index: gcc-4.3/porting_to.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/gcc-4.3/porting_to.html,v
retrieving revision 1.13
diff -u
Hello world,
there still was one piece missing for the new matmul library
version. To make sure that users (usually) benefit, we need
to call the library by default up from a certain limit.
The attached patch does that, with a limit of 30, which seems
to be reasonable given a few benchmarks.
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>>> It seems gcc.gnu.org enforces a strict Content Security Policy
>>> (cf.
>>> http://www.html5rocks.com/en/tutorials/security/content-security-policy/
>>> for example) which does not allow for inline CSS styles.
>>>
>>> Content-Security-Policy:
Also center-align Twitter (not just Google+) and remove no-ops
style="border:0px" attributes for Twitter and Google+ icons.
Gerald
Index: style.mhtml
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/style.mhtml,v
retrieving revision 1.134
diff
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On the way I also slightly reduced padding left of the navigation bar,
> and converted one instance of cellspacing="0" to the corresponding CSS.
This is the second part of this. Again, nice to notice how CSS
reduces complexity inside the pages -- one
While converting the web pages to CSS last year -- not the least due
to the strict Content-Security-Policy put in place for gcc.gnu.org --
this was the last item on my list.
With the change below, https://www.gnu.org/software/gcc/ (which does
not have a strict Content-Security-Policy) and
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:29 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
>> Also, could you pls implement runtime test cases for new intrinsics.
>
> Hi,
>
> those tests are attached, are they Ok?
> ChangLog:
>
> gcc/testsuite/
>
> * gcc.target/i386/avx512vpopcntdq-check.h: New.
On Sat, 25 Feb 2017, Prathamesh Kulkarni wrote:
Hi,
The attached patch deletes calls to strdup, strndup if it's
return-value is unused,
and same for realloc if the first arg is NULL.
Bootstrap+tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for GCC 8 ?
Instead of specializing realloc(0,*) wherever we
Hi,
The attached patch deletes calls to strdup, strndup if it's
return-value is unused,
and same for realloc if the first arg is NULL.
Bootstrap+tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for GCC 8 ?
Thanks,
Prathamesh
2017-02-25 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 09:44:44PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> After hinting Marek to use const char *const in his G_ addition patch,
> I've grepped for other similar cases. The number_of_iterations_exit
> code doesn't make sense after we ended up (change from 6.x) with
> only a single wording,
On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 08:42:33AM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> On February 24, 2017 9:56:25 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek
> wrote:
> >Hi!
> >
> >On the following testcase we replace a PLUS_EXPR (which is considered
> >throwing with -fnon-call-exceptions when it has floating
36 matches
Mail list logo