On 06/23/2018 07:05 PM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 18:01, Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 06/22/2018 05:35 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> by default, guality invokes gdb with --quiet to avoid being unnecessarily
>>> verbose for each test. But as a consequence,
> This is second part of IPA summaries clean-up. It removes some not needed
>
> ::get_create in ipa-pure.const.c.
It breaks the attached testcase compiled with "gnatmake lto_full -f -a -flto":
gnatbind -x lto_full.ali
gnatlink lto_full.ali -flto
during IPA pass: pure-const
lto1: internal
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 03:26:50PM +0300, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> I took arm/ldmstm.md as an inspiration. See attached machine description for
> PRU that requires the increase. I omitted this machine-generated MD file from
> my first patch set, but per comments will include it in v2.
>
> PRU
Hello,
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 18:01, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 06/22/2018 05:35 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > by default, guality invokes gdb with --quiet to avoid being unnecessarily
> > verbose for each test. But as a consequence, we don't see which version of
> > gdb is used.
> >
> >
On Sat, 23 Jun 2018 at 18:16, Steve Kargl
wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >
> > I've seen that on arm and aarch64 too.
> >
>
> It was fixed yesterday. Update your sources.
>
Ha right, sorry for the noise. I missed because it was masked by other
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 06:11:24PM +0200, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> I've seen that on arm and aarch64 too.
>
It was fixed yesterday. Update your sources.
--
Steve
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 13:36, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 06/21/2018 05:25 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 09:03:47AM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> >> Ping!
> >>
> >>> 2018-06-19 Paul Thomas
> >>>
> >>> PR fortran/49630
> >>> * resolve.c
On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 04:46:19PM -0400, Fritz Reese wrote:
>
> In any case, the changelog is here, and the patch is attached. Aside
> from the issues mentioned below the compile bootstraps and regression
> tests successfully. Does this look OK for trunk? Furthermore, this
> patch comes a bit
On петък, 22 юни 2018 г. 12:20:46 EEST Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/13/2018 12:57 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2018-06-13 Dimitar Dimitrov
> >
> > * configure: Regenerate.
> > * configure.ac: Add PRU target.
> >
> > gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > 2018-06-13 Dimitar
On Sat, Jun 23, 2018 at 07:51:17AM -0700, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> This patch is simple, eliminates an assert and allows further processing
> to give reasonable diagnostics.
>
> Regression tested.
>
> I don't think we really need a test case, but I can add one of the cases
> from the PR.
>
> OK
This patch is simple, eliminates an assert and allows further processing
to give reasonable diagnostics.
Regression tested.
I don't think we really need a test case, but I can add one of the cases
from the PR.
OK for trunk?
Regards,
Jerry
2018-06-23 Jerry DeLisle
PR
For some targets, Pmode != UNITS_PER_WORD. Take this into account
when marking hard registers as being used.
I tested C and C++ testsuits for x86_64 with and without this
patch. There was no regression, i.e. gcc.sum and g++.sum matched
exactly.
Changes since patch series v1:
- Cleanup to use
On петък, 22 юни 2018 г. 19:41:55 EEST Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:33:06AM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> > On 06/13/2018 12:58 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > > The PRU load/store instructions can access memory with byte
> > >
> > > granularity for all 30 of its 32-bit GP
On петък, 22 юни 2018 г. 10:37:10 EEST Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/21/2018 10:01 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> > On четвъртък, 21 юни 2018 г. 17:03:55 EEST Jeff Law wrote:
> >> On 06/21/2018 11:44 AM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
> >>> On 06/13/2018 02:58 PM, Dimitar Dimitrov wrote:
> From: Dimitar
14 matches
Mail list logo
