Hi Julian!
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 21:10:50 +, Julian Brown wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 16:25:42 +0100
> Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > [...]
>
> I've made those changes in the attached, thank you. OK?
Yes, thanks!
Grüße
Thomas
> 2018-XX-YY James Norris
> Cesar Philippidis
>
Jeff noticed that some dfp stuff was miscompiled. I appearantly
didn't notice the new assert registering isn't guarded by
EQ/NE_EXPR thus the following makes it fancy.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2018-12-04 Richard Biener
PR
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 17:05, Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 10:14:11AM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > This new test fails on arm and other targets according to
> > gcc-testresults. On arm, I can see:
> > /gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/lambda-generic-83856.C:6:27: fatal error:
>
On Tue, Dec 04, 2018 at 11:20:38AM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> This commit didn't fix the failure I reported on some arm targets, and
> it introduced
> a regression on aarch64-none-elf with -mabi=ilp32:
> FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64242.c -O0 execution test
> Il seems the test
On Mon, 3 Dec 2018 at 17:26, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> Here is a fix for the testcase, so that it doesn't FAIL pretty much
> everywhere.
>
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 04:07:31PM -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > > PR middle-end/64242
> > > * gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64242.c: New test.
> >
Without this patch go tool vet segfaults on alpha due to unknown
architecture for gc compiler:
go tool vet: exit status 2
panic: runtime error: invalid memory address or nil pointer dereference
[signal SIGSEGV: segmentation violation code=1 addr=24 pc=4832064492]
goroutine 1 [running]:
panic
Hi!
This patch adds further tweaks discussed in the last PR88188 mail.
ccr_bit now returns -1 instead of failing assertions, so that the caller
can decide what to do with it (fail assertion or output_operand_lossage
with some reasonable diagnostics.
For D and t it now requires CR_REGNO_P, so that
Hi!
I've noticed these two tests now FAIL with -std=c++2a, they don't print
any diagnostics. As I believe that was the point of the P0634R3 changes,
this patch adjusts the testcases. Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2018-12-04 Jakub Jelinek
*
On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 12:20 AM Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 6:55 PM bin.cheng
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Sender:Jan Hubicka
> > > Sent at:2018 Nov 5 (Mon) 22:21
> > > To:Richard Biener
> > > Cc:bin.cheng ; GCC Patches
> > >
> > > Subject:Re: [PATCH AutoFDO/2]Treat ZERO as
cxx_pretty_printer::type_id do not treat pointer to
pointer to member correctly.
this patch handle pointer to pointer to member according to
C++ standard 11.3.3.
I don't have write access to gcc.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux
Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou
2018-12-04 Zhouyi Zhou
101 - 110 of 110 matches
Mail list logo