I noticed that we weren't diagnosing using 'this' in noexcept-specifiers
of static member functions, and Jakub pointed out that this is also true
for trailing-return-type. cp_parser has local_variables_forbidden_p to
detect using local vars and 'this' in certain contexts, so let's use that.
On Tue, 18 Dec 2018 13:47:34 +0100
Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 03:44:25PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
> > +static tree
> > +convert_to_firstprivate_int (tree var, gimple_seq *gs)
> > +{
> > + tree type = TREE_TYPE (var), new_type = NULL_TREE;
> > + tree tmp = NULL_TREE;
> > +
Hi,
while fixing Firefox issues I also noticed that type simplification
completely disabled type based devirtualization on LTO path. Problem
is that method pointers now point to simplified type and
obj_type_ref_class is not ready for that.
I also moved testcases where it makes sense to lto so
On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 05:00:19PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 16, 2018 at 11:04:44AM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > The attached patch has been tested on i586-*-freebsd and x86_64-*-freebsd.
> > If a data-statement-object is a component of a derived type, it checks if
> > that
On 12/21/18 2:03 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 12/20/18 2:07 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> On 12/20/18 6:50 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
>>> On 12/20/18 10:46 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 12/17/18 7:58 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/15/18 3:36 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> this patch
Hi Julian,
> On 21 Dec 2018, at 16:47, Julian Brown wrote:
>
> On Fri, 21 Dec 2018 14:31:19 +0100
> Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 21, 2018 at 01:23:03PM +, Julian Brown wrote:
>>> 2018-xx-yy Nathan Sidwell
>
>>> * testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c++/pr71959-a.C: New.
>>> *
Hi Thomas,
That's OK for 7- through 9-branches.
Thanks for the fix.
Paul
On Sun, 16 Dec 2018 at 22:01, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hello world,
>
> the PR pointed out an old regression because the front-end optimization
> pass was substituting 2**n with ishift(1,n), where n was an array.
>
>
Hi Steve,
The attached patch addresses an issue submitted by Neil
Carlson. He and I have an exchange in the PR's audit
trail hashing out the validity of his code example. I
also asked on the J3 mailing about the his code. It seems
that language of the Fortran standard may have been
Ping?
the PR pointed out an old regression because the front-end optimization
pass was substituting 2**n with ishift(1,n), where n was an array.
Simply removing the optimization for that case would have been easy,
but also introduced a performance regression.
So, for this, I moved the
