Hi,
this patch fixes false warning that is output when different -std
settings are used. In this case C++ FE produces same declaration in
different representations which differ by 0 sized fileds only.
The patch makes them to be ignored (and I checked we ignore them for
canonical type merging too)
Hi Iain,
>> I don't think you need concern yourself with this very much: it's just a
>> hack around a Solaris ld bug, suggested by the Solaris linker engineers
>> for the moment. Once the dlpi_tls_modid patch lands in Solaris 11.5
>> (this week or next), I'll ask if they see a chance to have
Hi Thomas,
Thanks a lot. Committed as revision 270353.
I was determined not to repeat the PDT experience, which is still
nagging at me. That has to be the next major gfc project, I guess.
Regards
Paul
On Sun, 14 Apr 2019 at 18:08, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
>
> > Please find
Hi Paul,
Please find attached the updated patch, which fixes the problem with
-m32 in PR90022, eliminates the temporary creation for INTENT(IN)
dummies and fixes PR89846.
While it looks like it should be intrusive because of its size, I
believe that the patch is still safe for trunk since it
Dear All,
Please find attached the updated patch, which fixes the problem with
-m32 in PR90022, eliminates the temporary creation for INTENT(IN)
dummies and fixes PR89846.
While it looks like it should be intrusive because of its size, I
believe that the patch is still safe for trunk since it is
Even if we disable libphobos (as unsupported in libphobos/configure.tgt
or using --disable-libphobos), config-lang.in still adds target-libbacktrace
to the target_libs. This means target-zlib and target-libbacktrace still end up
being configured. On some embedded toolchains, libbacktrace however
On Tue, 19 Feb 2019 at 13:58, Rainer Orth wrote:
>
> Hi Iain,
>
> >> Thanks. This will have to wait for
> >>
> >> [libphobos] Use sections_elf_shared.d on Solaris 11.5 (PR d/88150)
> >> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg01661.html
> >
> > I'll make a fork of sections
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Swedish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/sv.po
(This file,
Hi Iain,
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 13:35, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>>
>> With the set of libphobos Solaris patches just posted, it would become
>> possible to enable libphobos on Solaris 11/x86 by default.
>>
>> This is what this patch does.
>>
>> * It uses a LIBPHOBOS_SUPPORTED variable both in
Hi Iain,
> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 21:27, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>>
>> Rainer Orth writes:
>>
>> > Before Solaris 11.5, struct dl_phdr_info lacked the dlpi_tls_modid
>> > member. While the support might be backported to Solaris 11.4, it
>> > certainly won't to previous Solaris releases. To work
Hi Iain,
> On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 at 11:25, Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>>
>> I've successfully been using a late prototype of an implementation of
>> the dlpi_tls_modid field of struct dl_phdr_info on Solaris 11.5 Beta.
>> This allowed me to get pretty reasonable test results using
>>
Am 13.04.19 um 18:48 schrieb Iain Buclaw:
On Mon, 25 Mar 2019 at 20:04, Johannes Pfau wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/d/d-system.h b/gcc/d/d-system.h
index efece15f3bc..6c18b69d4df 100644
--- a/gcc/d/d-system.h
+++ b/gcc/d/d-system.h
@@ -55,4 +55,10 @@
#undef tolower
#define tolower(c) TOLOWER(c)
The code that checks if an auto-increment from i0 or i1 is not lost is
a bit shaky. The code to check the same for i2 is non-existent, and
cannot be implemented in a similar way at all. So, this patch counts
all auto-increments, and makes sure we end up with the same number as
we started with.
13 matches
Mail list logo
