Re: [Bug tree-optimization/109429] [PATCH v2] ivopts: fixed complexities

A kind remind/ping on the patch. Kind regards, Aleksandar Rakić From: Aleksandar Rakic Sent: Wednesday, October 9, 2024 2:15 PM To: richard.guent...@gmail.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Djordje Todorovic; Jovan Dmitrovic Subject: Re: [Bug tree

Re: [Bug tree-optimization/109429] [PATCH v2] ivopts: fixed complexities

A kind remind/ping on the patch. Kind regards, Aleksandar Rakić From: Aleksandar Rakic Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2024 5:32 PM To: richard.guent...@gmail.com Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Djordje Todorovic; Jovan Dmitrovic Subject: [Bug tree

[Bug tree-optimization/109429] [PATCH v2] ivopts: fixed complexities

reordering and proper invariant variables handling in address expressions. These changes align with the approach used in parent commit c2b64ce. The improved complexity calculations ensure better candidate selection and reduced code size, particularly for RISC CPUs. Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Rakic

[Bug tree-optimization/109429] [PATCH] ivopts: fixed complexities

ize, particularly for RISC CPUs. Signed-off-by: Aleksandar Rakic Signed-off-by: Jovan Dmitrovic gcc/ChangeLog: * tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.cc (get_address_cost): Fixed complexity calculation. gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog: * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/bug_tree-optimization_109429.c: New t

Re: [PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity

work to be presented as irrelevant and inappropriate. From: Richard Biener Sent: Wednesday, June 26, 2024 2:50 PM To: Aleksandar Rakic Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; jeffreya...@gmail.com; rguent...@suse.de; ja...@redhat.com; Djordje Todorovic; Jovan Dmitrovic

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity

Hi! I'd like to ping the following patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported addressing modes in ivopts This patch should be a fix for the bug which is described on the following link: https:/

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity

Hi! I'd like to ping the following patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html a patch for the computation of the complexity for the unsupported addressing modes in ivopts This patch should be a fix for the bug which is described on the following link: https:/

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

PING: I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html

[PING] Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

I remind you that the patch for the computation of complexity for unsupported addressing modes ( https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109429 ) has been sent: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-March/647966.html

Re: [PATCH 1/2] ivopts: Revert computation of address cost complexity.

Here is a patch for the GCC bug 109429.