Re: [PATCH] pr51020 Fix invalid options validation for ARM target

Hi guys, This issue has not been fixed in latest Linaro release (4.6.2012.04) yet. Can you suggest whether this patch is a correct fix for the pr51020. If so, should it be applied to the corresponding gcc branch? On Tue, May 01, 2012 at 11:21:28PM +0400, Alexey Kravets wrote: On Mon, Apr 30

Re: [PATCH] pr51020 Fix invalid options validation for ARM target

On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:15:03PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw wrote: On 28/04/12 11:04, Alexey Kravets wrote: Hi guys, Please, take a look at this patch. It fixes the invalid star symbol processing in validate_switches function reported in GCC bugzilla: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[PATCH] pr51020 Fix invalid options validation for ARM target

details). It showed no regressions on GCC-4.6.3 on ARM. ChangeLog: * gcc/gcc.c(validate_switches): Reset starred flag. * gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/pr51020.c: New test. -- Alexey Kravets a.krav...@samsung.com local ext. 3964 diff --git a/gcc/gcc.c b/gcc/gcc.c index 75f522e..e3c8609 100644

Couple of fixes to GRAPHITE-OpenCL

-codegen.c (opencl_print_operand): Handle MINUS_EXPR in OpenCL kernel code generation. [2] * graphite-opencl.c (opencl_postpass_data): Use correct vectors for processing postpass data in opencl_postpass_data -- Alexey Kravets mr.kayr...@gmail.com * graphite-opencl.c