> Is just using std::terminate as the handler viable? Or if we're sure
> contracts in some form will go into the IS eventually, and the
> signature won't change, we could just add it in __cxxabiv1:: as you
> suggested earlier.
No, the handler needs to be configurable (at least quietly) in order
I think so, yes.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2021 at 11:09 AM Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On 7/1/21 12:27 PM, Andrew Sutton wrote:
> >>> I think this version addresses most of your concerns.
> >>
> >> Thanks, looking good. I'll fuss with it a bit and commit it soon.
>
> Do you agree that this testcase should
> > I think this version addresses most of your concerns.
>
> Thanks, looking good. I'll fuss with it a bit and commit it soon.
Awesome!
Andrew
>
>
> > Attached is a new squashed revision of the patch sans ChangeLogs. The
> > current work is now being done on github:
> > https://github.com/lock3/gcc/tree/contracts-jac-alt
>
> I'm starting to review this now, sorry for the delay. Is this still the
> branch you want me to consider for GCC
Hi Jason,
Sorry I haven't been able to get back to this. I've been swamped with
other work, and we haven't had the resources to properly address this.
Jeff Chapman will be working on cleaning this up for when master/trunk
re-opens.
> I find the proposed always_continue semantics kind of
