On Mon, 20 May 2024 at 15:23, Nick Clifton wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe,
>
> > I have a follow-up one: I think the same applies to binutils, but I
> > don't think any maintainer / contributor expressed an opinion, and
> > IIUC patch policy for binutils is (lightly) documented at
> >
Hi Alexandre,
On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 15:29, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Apr 30, 2024, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 01:31, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> >> for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> >> >>
> >> >>
Thank you Mark and sorry for missing this during the reviews.
Christophe
Le dim. 12 mai 2024, 14:54, Mark Wielaard a écrit :
> The new cygming.opt.urls and mingw.opt.urls in the
> gcc/config/mingw/cygming.opt.urls directory need to generated by make
> regenerate-opt-urls in the gcc
are interpreted byte-by-byte at
instruction level, see
https://developer.arm.com/documentation/101028/0012/14--M-profile-Vector-Extension--MVE--intrinsics.
This is a workaround until we change such predicates representation to
V16BImode.
2024-05-06 Christophe Lyon
Jakub Jelinek
PR
Hi,
I've just pushed this patch series, congratulations!
Thanks,
Christophe
On Thu, 11 Apr 2024 at 15:40, Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Thank you for reviewing v2!
> v3 addresses all comments on v2.
>
> v3 Changes:
> - Exclude the aarch64_calling_abi declaration from the patch series.
On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 15:47, Gaius Mulley wrote:
>
> Simon Marchi writes:
>
> >
> > I don't have access to the gcc repo, so could you please push the patch
> > on my behalf?
>
> all done - many thanks for the patch!
>
Great, I think we now have to update autoregen.py on the buildbot so
that it
On Thu, 2 May 2024 at 23:13, FX Coudert wrote:
>
> > libgfortran/ChangeLog:
> > * Makefile.am: Use sub-dirs, amend recipies accordingly.
> > * Makefile.in: Regenerate.
>
> Thanks Iain, I’ve tested it both with and without maintainer mode, and
> regenerated files with no issue. I can also confirm
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 17:47, Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> On 4/30/24 4:54 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 04:25, Simon Marchi wrote:
> >>
> >> Add an "AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS" call in configure.ac, with the same
> >> directories
Hi Alexandre,
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 01:31, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> On Apr 22, 2024, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> >> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu and ppc64el-linux-gnu. Also tested with
> >> gcc-13 on ppc64-vx7r2 and ppc-vx7r2. Ok to install?
>
> > That makes sense. OK
>
> >> for
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 04:25, Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> Add an "AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIRS" call in configure.ac, with the same
> directories as specified in "ACLOCAL_AMFLAGS", in Makefile.in.
>
> This makes it possible to re-generate aclocal.m4 using "autoreconf".
Thanks, this LGTM, although like in
On Tue, 30 Apr 2024 at 04:01, Simon Marchi wrote:
>
> I get a diff when running "autoreconf" in this directory. I think that
> the current state is erroneous: it appears to have been generated using
>
> aclocal -I ../config -I ..
>
> even though configure.ac and Makefile.am list the include
On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 at 15:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2024 at 11:10:12PM +, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/pr114801.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> > +/* { dg-do compile } */
> > +/* { dg-requi
d, as soon as
> trunk reopens fully for 15.1.
>
Thanks!
Note that I already pushed the patch as r14-9865-g73fb0a6153f478
so you may have conflicts (easy to fix ;-) )
Christophe
> Best,
>
> Arthur
>
> On 4/4/24 18:27, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > rust has the (empty) rust.d
In this PR, we have to handle a case where MVE predicates are supplied
as a const_int, where individual predicates have illegal boolean
values (such as 0xc for a 4-bit boolean predicate). To avoid the ICE,
we canonicalize them, replacing a non-null value with -1.
2024-04-26 Christophe Lyon
On Fri, 26 Apr 2024 at 10:25, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 17:44, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> >
> > Discussion is here:
> > https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/CAPS5khZeWkAD=v8ka9g5eecdnk3bdhfnzjumpvc+hedmkvj...@mail.gmail.com/
> >
> > Rough c
On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 at 17:44, Carlos O'Donell wrote:
>
> Discussion is here:
> https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/CAPS5khZeWkAD=v8ka9g5eecdnk3bdhfnzjumpvc+hedmkvj...@mail.gmail.com/
>
> Rough consensus from Jakub Jelinek, Richard Biener and others is
> that maintainers are for the change.
>
> This
Hi Patrick,
On Sat, 13 Apr 2024 at 22:12, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> Pushed as obvious after verifying C++11 bootstrap is restored.
I guess this also fixes the bootstrap_ubsan breakage on aarch64
reported by Linaro CI?
See https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1199
(I think you also received a
On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 11:03, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> This script is a copy of the current script used by Sourceware's
> autoregen buildbots.
>
> It is intended as a helper to regenerate files managed by autotools
> (autoconf, automake, aclocal, ), as well as the topl
maintainer-mode, but this is not
covered by this script.
2024-04-19 Christophe Lyon
contrib/
* autogen.py: New script.
---
contrib/autoregen.py | 221 +++
1 file changed, 221 insertions(+)
create mode 100755 contrib/autoregen.py
diff
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 at 09:37, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The following testcase aborts on aarch64-linux but does not on x86_64-linux.
> In both cases there is UB in the __divmodbitint4 implemenetation.
> When the divisor is negative with most significant limb (even when partial)
> all ones,
As discussed in the PR, aclocal.m4 and configure were incorrectly
regenerated at some point.
2024-04-17 Christophe Lyon
PR preprocessor/114748
libcpp/
* aclocal.m4: Regenerate.
* configure: Regenerate.
---
libcpp/aclocal.m4 | 1 +
libcpp/configure | 3 +++
2
ping?
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 10:26, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> ping?
>
> On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:54, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 12:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 10:48, Christophe Lyon
rust has the (empty) rust.dvi and rust.html rules, but lacks the
(empty) rust.install-dvi and rust.install-html ones.
2024-04-04 Christophe Lyon
gcc/rust/
* Make-lang.in (rust.install-dvi, rust.install-html): New rules.
---
gcc/rust/Make-lang.in | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2
m2 has a m2.dvi build rule, but lacks the m2.install-dvi one.
2024-04-04 Christophe Lyon
gcc/m2/
* Make-lang.in (m2.install-dvi): New rule.
---
gcc/m2/Make-lang.in | 12
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/m2/Make-lang.in b/gcc/m2/Make-lang.in
go has a go.dvi build rule, but lacks the go.install-dvi one.
2024-04-04 Christophe Lyon
gcc/go/
* Make-lang.in (go.install-dvi): New rule.
---
gcc/go/Make-lang.in | 10 ++
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/go/Make-lang.in b/gcc/go/Make-lang.in
index
Fix a few typos: the generated filename is m2.info (not gm2.info, and
gm2$(exeext) is a file not a directory (so test -d would always fail).
2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
gcc/m2/
* Make-lang.in (m2.install-info): Fix rule.
---
gcc/m2/Make-lang.in | 14 +++---
1 file
This rule was missing, and 'make install-html' was failing.
It is copied from the corresponding one in fortran.
2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
gcc/m2/
* Make-lang.in (install-html): New rule.
---
gcc/m2/Make-lang.in | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff
There was a typo in the testcase, with GCC_CPUINFO pointing to the
wrong file.
Committed as obvious.
2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/aarch64/cpunative/native_cpu_24.c: Fix GCC_CPUINFO.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/cpunative/native_cpu_24.c | 2
Fix the comment to document FEATURE_STRING instead of FEAT_STRING.
2024-03-29 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def: Fix comment.
---
gcc/config/aarch64/aarch64-option-extensions.def | 16
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8
Hi,
On 3/22/24 21:14, Max Filippov wrote:
libgcc/
* unwind-arm-common.inc (__gnu_personality_sigframe_fdpic): Cast
last argument of _Unwind_VRS_Set to void *.
---
libgcc/unwind-arm-common.inc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Mon, 18 Mar 2024 at 22:35, Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> Monday, March 18, 2024 2:27 PM
> Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > > +/* Disable SEH and declare the required SEH-related macros that are
> > > +still needed for compilation. */ #undef TARGET_SEH #define
> > &g
On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 at 21:48, Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> Monday, March 4, 2024
> Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> >
> > Changes from v1 to v2:
> > Adjust the target name to aarch64-*-mingw* to exclude the big-endian target
> > from support.
> > Exclude 64-bit ISA.
> > Rename enum calling_abi to
Hi!
On Mon, 4 Mar 2024 at 18:44, Evgeny Karpov wrote:
>
> From: Zac Walker
> Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2024 10:49:28 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH v2 08/13] aarch64: Add Cygwin and MinGW environments for
> AArch64
>
> Define Cygwin and MinGW environment such as types, SEH definitions,
> shared libraries,
t;
attribute instead, and solves the problem.
2024-03-15 Christophe Lyon
PR target/114323
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-mve-builtins.cc
(function_instance::reads_global_state_p): Take CP_READ_MEMORY
into account.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/arm/mve/pr114
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 at 12:15, Victor Do Nascimento
wrote:
>
> Given how, at present, the choice of using LSE128 atomic instructions
> by the toolchain is delegated to run-time selection in the form of
> Libatomic ifuncs, responsible for querying target support, the
> `+lse128' target architecture
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 10:13, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 09:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > When targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this () (aka on arm32 TARGET_AAPCS_BASED)
> > constructor is supposed to return this pointer, but
On Fri, 23 Feb 2024 at 09:42, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> When targetm.cxx.cdtor_returns_this () (aka on arm32 TARGET_AAPCS_BASED)
> constructor is supposed to return this pointer, but when we cp_fold such
> a call, we don't take that into account and just INIT_EXPR the object,
> so we can
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 11:27, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 11:13:49AM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 06:56, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello, Christophe,
> > >
> > > On Feb 10, 2024,
On Mon, 12 Feb 2024 at 09:00, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 10:21 PM Toon Moene wrote:
> >
> > I managed to try this patch on aarch64-linux-gnu:
> >
> > This is the test run without your patch:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2024-February/807637.html
>
On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 06:56, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Hello, Christophe,
>
> On Feb 10, 2024, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > gcc/
> > * Makefile.in: Add no-info dependency.
> > * configure.ac: Set BUILD_INFO=no-info if makeinfo is not
> >
Hi!
On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 06:37, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Hello, Christophe,
>
> Thanks for the patch.
>
> On Feb 5, 2024, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > In order to save build time, our CI overrides BUILD_INFO="", which
> > works when invoking 'm
ping?
On Thu, 25 Jan 2024 at 16:54, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 12:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 10:48, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > >
> > > GDB emits end of lines as \r\n, we currently match the reverse \n
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 11:40, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 11:10, wrote:
> >
> > On 1 February 2024 18:15:34 CET, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> > >BUILD_INFO is currently a byproduct of checking makeinfo
> > >presence/version.
e
'install' depends on 'install-info', which depends on
$(DESTDIR)$(infodir)/gccint.info (among others).
This patch makes the 'install-info' dependency in 'install'
conditioned by BUILD_INFO.
2024-02-05 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* Makefile.in: Use install-info only if BUILD_INFO is
On Fri, 2 Feb 2024 at 11:10, wrote:
>
> On 1 February 2024 18:15:34 CET, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >BUILD_INFO is currently a byproduct of checking makeinfo
> >presence/version. INSTALL_INFO used to be defined similarly, but was
> >re
e
'install' depends on 'install-info', which depends on
$(DESTDIR)$(infodir)/gccint.info (among others).
This patch replaces the 'install-info' dependency in 'install' with
$(INSTALL_INFO), thus enabling to skip this step.
2024-02-01 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* Makefile.in: Add IN
On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 12:02, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2024 at 10:48, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> >
> > GDB emits end of lines as \r\n, we currently match the reverse \n\r,
>
> We currently match [\n\r]+ which should match any of \n, \r, \n\r or \r\n
&g
to match the right order implied fixing the
second one, to skip the empty lines.
Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu.
[1] https//github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/blob/master/gdb/testsuite/README#L269
2024-01-24 Christophe Lyon
libstdc++-v3/
* testsuite/lib/gdb-test.exp (gdb-test): Fix regexps
On Fri, 19 Jan 2024 at 08:41, Nathaniel Shead wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu using a cross-compiler to
> arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf with --enable-threads=0 that the link test
> is correctly skipped. OK for trunk?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> This disables the new test added by r14-8168 on machines
their respective upstream repo, so should not be
patched here.
[1] https://github.com/bminor/binutils-gdb/blob/master/gdb/testsuite/README#L269
2023-12-21 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* Makefile.in: Allow overriding EXEPCT.
libgm2/
* Makefile.am: Allow overriding EXEPCT
On Fri, 1 Dec 2023 at 13:44, Richard Earnshaw (lists)
wrote:
>
> On 01/12/2023 11:28, Saurabh Jha wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > I introduced this test "gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/mve/pr112337.c" in
> > this commit 2365aae84de030bbb006edac18c9314812fc657b before. This had an
> > error which I
error message.
2023-11-30 Christophe Lyon
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.target/arm/bfloat16_vector_typecheck_1.c: Update expected
error message.
* gcc.target/arm/bfloat16_vector_typecheck_2.c: Likewise.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/arm/bfloat16_vector_typecheck_1.c | 4
On Mon, 27 Nov 2023 at 11:33, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On 27.11.23 11:20, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>
> > I think the lack of final '.' in:
>
> Indeed - but you are lagging a bit behind:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-November/638128.ht
Hi!
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 15:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 02:51:28PM +0100, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> > Following the general trend to add a "[-W...]" to the warning messages
> > for both better grouping of the warnings and - more importantly - for
> > providing
> > a
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 17:35, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> > On 23 Nov 2023, at 16:11, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Iain,
> >
> > Thanks for dealing with this :-)
> >
> > On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 10:58, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
Hi Iain,
Thanks for dealing with this :-)
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 10:58, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Tested on a cross to armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf where the failing
> testcase is restored, and on aarch64-linux-gnu where no change is seen
> on the aarch64.exp suite. Also tested on arm64 Darwin
Hi!
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 14:29, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2023-11-16 15:26:14 +, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> > diff --git a/gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h
> > b/gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h
> > index eba1f071af0..6d234
My recent commit 0c2037d9d93a8f768cb11698ff794278246bb31f added a
switch statement lacking a default clause, leading to warnings or
errors when building with --enable-werror-always.
Fix by adding an empty default.
Committed as obvious.
2023-11-23 Christophe Lyon
gcc
On Thu, 23 Nov 2023 at 10:09, Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi Christophe.
>
> > On 23 Nov 2023, at 09:02, Christophe Lyon
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi Iain,
> >
> > On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:58, Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Iai
Hi Iain,
On Mon, 6 Nov 2023 at 11:58, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Iain Sandoe writes:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> >> On 5 Nov 2023, at 12:11, Richard Sandiford
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Iain Sandoe writes:
> >
> On 26 Oct 2023, at 21:00, Iain Sandoe wrote:
> >>>
> > On 26 Oct 2023, at
Hi,
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 12:22, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 21.11.23 11:46, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 11:42:06AM +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> >>
> >> On 21.11.23 11:34, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> --- a/gcc/tree-profile.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-profile.cc
> @@
Hi!
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 22:24, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> On 2023-11-19T16:05:42+0100, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/tree-ssa/return-value-range-1.c
>
> Pushed to master branch commit a0240662b22312ffb3e3fefb85f258ab0e7010f4
> "Fix
In commt 0c2037d9d93a8f768cb11698ff794278246bb31f (Add support for
contiguous loads and stores), I added a spurious line which broke
bootstrap because of an unused variable error.
This patch removes it.
Committed as obvious.
2023-11-22 Christophe Lyon
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/arm
On Tue, 21 Nov 2023 at 09:48, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> ARM defaults to -fshort-enums and the following testcase FAILs there in 2
> lines. The difference is that in C++, E0 has enum E type, which normally
> has unsigned int underlying type, so it isn't int nor something that
> promotes to
Hi!
On Sun, 19 Nov 2023 at 16:05, Jan Hubicka wrote:
>
> Hi,
> this is updated version which also adds testuiste compensation
> I lost earlier while maintaining the patch in my testing tree.
> There are quite few testcases that use constant return values to hide
> something from optimizer.
>
>
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 15:39, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 20/11/2023 14:24, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 14:58, Richard Earnshaw
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 20/11/2023 13:36, Christophe Lyon
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 14:58, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 20/11/2023 13:36, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 13:44, Richard Earnshaw
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 20/11/2023 10:23, Christophe Lyon wrote
On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 at 13:44, Richard Earnshaw
wrote:
>
>
>
> On 20/11/2023 10:23, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > Hi Richard,
> >
> > On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 15:28, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> A number of tests in the gcc testsui
Hi Richard,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 15:27, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>
> Add an arm-specific test to check_effective_target_hard_float for
> Arm to handle cases where we only have single-precision FP in hardware.
>
> gcc/testsuite:
>
> * lib/target-supports.exp
Hi Richard,
On Mon, 13 Nov 2023 at 15:28, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
>
>
> A number of tests in the gcc testsuite, especially for arm-specific
> targets, add various flags to control the architecture. These run
> into problems when the compiler is configured with -mfpu=auto if the
> new
Hi Saurabh,
On Tue, 14 Nov 2023 at 15:51, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
> Hi Saurabh,
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Saurabh Jha
> > Sent: Thursday, November 9, 2023 10:12 AM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Earnshaw
> > ; Richard Sandiford
> >
> > Subject: [PATCH] Add a REG_P
On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 at 16:30, Kyrylo Tkachov wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Christophe Lyon
> > Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2023 3:26 PM
> > To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Sandiford
> > ; Richard Earnshaw
> > ; Kyrylo
Implement vld1q, vst1q using the new MVE builtins framework.
2023-11-16 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-base.cc (vld1_impl, vld1q)
(vst1_impl, vst1q): New.
* config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-base.def (vld1q, vst1q): New.
* config/arm/arm
as needed.
2023-11-16 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-functions.h (multi_vector_function)
(full_width_access): New classes.
* config/arm/arm-mve-builtins.cc
(find_type_suffix_for_scalar_type, infer_pointer_type
vst1q intrinsics return void, so we should not do 'return vst1q_f16 (base,
value);'
This was OK so far, but will trigger an error/warning with the new
implementation of these intrinsics.
This patch just removes the 'return' keyword.
2023-11-16 Christophe Lyon
gcc/testsuite
This patch adds support for '_', 'al' and 'as' for void, load pointer
and store pointer argument/return value types in intrinsic signatures.
It also adds a mew memory_scalar_type() helper to function_instance,
which is used by 'al' and 'as'.
2023-11-16 Christophe Lyon
gcc
This patch adds the load and store shapes descriptions.
2023-11-16 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-shapes.cc (load, store): New.
* config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-shapes.h (load, store): New.
---
gcc/config/arm/arm-mve-builtins-shapes.cc | 67
type
note: expected 'int *' but argument is of type 'int32_t *' {aka 'long int *'}
This patch uses get_typenode_from_name (INT32_TYPE) instead, which
defines the types as appropriate for the target/C library.
2023-11-16 Christophe Lyon
gcc/
* config/arm/arm-builtins.cc
Hi,
On 11/13/23 15:26, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
index 1a7bea96c1e..d414cddf4dc 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/target-supports.exp
@@ -5590,6 +5590,24 @@ proc
On 11/7/23 23:51, Richard Sandiford wrote:
Victor Do Nascimento writes:
Extend existing unit tests for the ACLE system register manipulation
functions to include 128-bit tests.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/aarch64/acle/rwsr.c (get_rsr128): New.
, this could be seen as a dejagnu bug: in gcc-dg-test-1 (in
gcc-dg.exp), we set compile_type to "precompiled_header", which is not
one of the supported values in dejagnu's default_target_compile (in
target.exp).
2023-10-27 Christophe Lyon
gcc/testsuite/
* lib/dg-pch.exp
On Fri, 27 Oct 2023 at 16:19, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
>
> On 10/27/23 09:56, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 16:00, Vladimir Makarov
> > wrote:
> >> This is the second attempt to improve RA cost calculation for
Hi Vladimir,
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 16:00, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> This is the second attempt to improve RA cost calculation for pseudos
> with equivalences. The patch explanation is in the log message.
>
> The patch was successfully bootstrapped and tested on x86-64, aarch64,
> and
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 19:44, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 12:48 PM Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 18:18, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
> > >
> > > On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:49 AM Christophe Lyon
> > > wrote:
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 18:18, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 4:49 AM Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> > We have noticed that the new tests fail on aarch64 with:
> > .../aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu/libc/usr/lib/crt1.o: in function `_start':
> > .../sysdeps/aarc
Hi!
On Wed, 20 Sept 2023 at 06:12, Lewis Hyatt wrote:
>
> Hello-
>
> This patch implements the PR's request to add more information to the
> diagnostic issued for using a poisoned identifier. Bootstrapped + regtested
> all languages on x86-64 Linux. Does it look OK please? Thanks!
>
> -Lewis
>
>
Ping?
Le lun. 2 oct. 2023, 10:23, Christophe Lyon a
écrit :
> ping? maybe this counts as obvious?
>
>
> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 11:13, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>
>> ping?
>>
>> On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 10:43, Christophe Lyon
>> wrote:
>>
&g
Ping?
Le lun. 2 oct. 2023, 10:24, Christophe Lyon a
écrit :
> ping?
>
> On Sun, 10 Sept 2023 at 21:31, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>
>> Some targets like arm-eabi with newlib and default settings rely on
>> __sync_synchronize() to ensure synchronization. N
LGTM but I'm not a maintainer ;-)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 04:22, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> Ping.
>
> > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> > Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:08:16 +0200
> >
> > s/atomic-exchange/atomic-cmpxchg-word/g.
> > Tested as v1.
> >
> > Ok to commit?
> > -- >8 --
> > These tests
LGTM but I'm not a maintainer ;-)
On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 04:21, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> Ping.
>
> > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> > Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 19:04:55 +0200
> >
> > > From: Hans-Peter Nilsson
> > > Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2023 17:15:28 +0200
> >
> > > New version coming up.
> >
> >
>
> > From: Christophe Lyon
> > Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 18:06:21 +0200
>
> > On Tue, 3 Oct 2023 at 17:16, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> >
> > > > From: Christophe Lyon
> > > > Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2023 15:20:39 +0200
> > >
> &
Hi!
On Tue, 26 Sept 2023 at 16:34, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Tested cris-elf, native x86_64-pc-linux-gnu and arm-eabi.
>
> For arm-eabi, notably lacking any atomic support for the
> default multilib, with --target_board=arm-sim it regressed
> 29_atomics/atomic_flag/cons/value_init.cc with the
ping?
On Sun, 10 Sept 2023 at 21:31, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> Some targets like arm-eabi with newlib and default settings rely on
> __sync_synchronize() to ensure synchronization. Newlib does not
> implement it by default, to make users aware they have to take special
> care.
&g
ping? maybe this counts as obvious?
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 11:13, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 10:43, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
>
>> The test was declaring 'int *carry;' and wrote to '*carry' without
>> initializing 'carry' first, lea
ping?
On Fri, 8 Sept 2023 at 10:43, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
> The test was declaring 'int *carry;' and wrote to '*carry' without
> initializing 'carry' first, leading to an attempt to write at address
> zero, and a crash.
>
> Fix by declaring 'int carry;' and passing '' in
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 11:06, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 09:41, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 10:17, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 0
effective target in the
tests that need it, making them UNSUPPORTED instead of FAIL and
UNRESOLVED.
2023-09-10 Christophe Lyon
libstdc++-v3/
* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/compare_exchange_padding.cc: Likewise.
* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic/cons/value_init.cc: Likewise
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 10:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 08:44, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 14:32, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Tested x86_64-linux and aarch
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 14:32, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Tested x86_64-linux and aarch64-linux. I intend to push this to trunk.
>
> -- >8 --
>
> These atomics cause linker errors on arm4t where __sync_synchronize is
> not defined. For single-threaded targets we don't need the atomics.
>
>
I
On Tue, 12 Sept 2023 at 11:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Sept 2023 at 08:59, Christophe Lyon
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 18:11, Jonathan Wakely
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 16:40, Christophe Lyon
1 - 100 of 2851 matches
Mail list logo
