Hi Jakub,
On 16.05.23 13:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Tue, May 16, 2023 at 11:45:16AM +0200, Frederik Harwath wrote:
The place where different compilers implement the loop transformations
was discussed in an OpenMP loop transformation meeting last year. Two
compilers (another one and GCC with
Hi Jakub,
On 15.05.23 12:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 04:30:38PM +0100, Frederik Harwath wrote:
this patch series implements the OpenMP 5.1 "unroll" and "tile"
constructs. It includes changes to the C,C++, and Fortran front end
for parsing the new constructs and a new
Hi Sandra,
the OMP_FOR documentation says that the loop index variable
must be signed and it does not list "!=" in the allowed conditional
expressions. But there is nothing that would automatically cast an
unsigned variable
to signed or that converts the "!=" as you can see from the dump
for
Hi Thomas,
On 01.04.23 10:42, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
... I see FAIL for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu '-m32' (thus, host, not
offloading), '-O0' (only):
[...]
FAIL: libgomp.fortran/loop-transforms/unroll-1.f90 -O0 execution test
[...]
FAIL:
