Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecture Vector Function ABI.

2020-12-04 Thread GT via Gcc-patches
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, August 20, 2020 1:48 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 04:19:36PM +, GT wrote: > > > > Great! Please repost with what I already pointed out fixed, that > > > explanation added, and working links to the documentation? > > >

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecture Vector Function ABI.

2020-08-20 Thread GT via Gcc-patches
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, August 13, 2020 5:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 08:40:22PM +, GT wrote: > > > I'm looking at ix86_simd_clone_adjust and also aarch64_simd_clone_adjust. > > The latter is > > much simpler and I see how I would add PPC

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecture Vector Function ABI.

2020-08-20 Thread GT via Gcc-patches
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Tuesday, August 18, 2020 5:32 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Tue, Aug 18, 2020 at 07:14:19PM +, GT wrote: > > > > That sounds like libmvec? > > > I still don't know what this is. > > > > Yes, it is libmvec. > > Now look at what GCC does to the code in

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecture Vector Function ABI.

2020-08-18 Thread GT via Gcc-patches
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, August 17, 2020 5:28 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 05:44:46PM +, GT wrote: > > > > This is about the Power binding to some OpenMP API, right? It has > > > nothing to do with "vector" or "ABI" -- we have vectors already,

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecture Vector Function ABI.

2020-08-17 Thread GT via Gcc-patches
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Thursday, August 13, 2020 6:49 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > Hi! > > This is about the Power binding to some OpenMP API, right? It has > nothing to do with "vector" or "ABI" -- we have vectors already, and > we have ABIs already, more than enough of each. >

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecture Vector Function ABI.

2020-08-13 Thread GT via Gcc-patches
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Monday, August 10, 2020 2:07 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 05:29:49PM +, GT wrote: > > > > For PowerPC, if all you want to support is b which requires VSX, then the > > > right thing is for !TREE_PUBLIC functions return 0 if

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/1] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecture Vector Function ABI.

2020-08-10 Thread GT via Gcc-patches
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Friday, August 7, 2020 4:59 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Fri, Aug 07, 2020 at 08:35:52PM +, Bert Tenjy via Gcc-patches wrote: > > > The document describing POWER Architecture Vector Function interface is > > tentatively at: > >

Re: [RFC PATCH v0] PPC64: Implement POWER Architecure Vector Function ABI.

2020-03-11 Thread GT via Gcc-patches
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐ On Sunday, February 16, 2020 7:06 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: > On Sat, Feb 15, 2020 at 05:22:09PM +, GT wrote: > > I have not been able to configure protonmail for either git imap-send or > > send-email. > > Do you use git format-patch? You should, as