On Sat, 28 Jun 2014, Ulrich Drepper wrote:
On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 6:42 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Ping,
nobody has an opinion on this? Or some explanation why I am mistaken to
believe that #pragma target makes it safer now?
It would enable a number of optimizations, like
= lshr_optab;
+ opr = optab_for_tree_code (RSHIFT_EXPR, type, optab_scalar);
Looks like there are some typos in there, you are assigning to oprv twice.
--
Marc Glisse
thread is created. I hope that not too many libraries
use threads internally in a way that would break this.
--
Marc Glisse
Hello,
in my calloc patch, I forgot to update the datastructure when replacing
malloc with calloc.
Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-06-25 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR tree-optimization/57742
gcc/
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (handle_builtin_memset): Update
))
+ (minus @0 (plus:c @0 @1))
(negate @0))
seems pointless
Why? a-(a+b) and a-(b+a) are both wanted and don't appear elsewhere in the
file, no? Should simplify to (negate @1) though.
--
Marc Glisse
commit
it tomorrow if there aren't any comments on the pass placement.
2014-06-24 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR tree-optimization/57742
gcc/
* tree-ssa-strlen.c (get_string_length): Ignore malloc.
(handle_builtin_malloc, handle_builtin_memset): New functions
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On June 23, 2014 5:51:30 PM CEST, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 23 Jun 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Ok for trunk, sorry for the delay.
Thanks. Richard has moved the passes a bit since then, but I still have
exactly one spot where
benchmarks, and their authors would be disappointed if the
compiler didn't mess it up regularly in new and entertaining ways ;-)
--
Marc Glisse
the compiler that we are doing memset(malloc(n),0,n).
--
Marc Glisse
Hello,
a trivial patch to remove a duplicated option, you can see the second one
4 lines below in the patch. (the mixed use of single or double spaces in
this list is strange)
This was included in the bootstrap of another patch.
2014-06-23 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
* doc
-unknown-linux-gnu.
(by the way, contrib/compare_tests is confused when I use all languages,
it prints comm: file 1 is not in sorted order and tons of spurious
differences)
2014-06-23 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR c++/60517
gcc/c/
* c-typeck.c (c_finish_return): Return 0
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Jun 20, 2014 at 10:42 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
as reported in PR 61503, there seems to be a typo in the shrd pattern. I
think it is quite unlikely to cause any problem, because the pattern is 1
instruction too long for combine
))
That seems complicated. You just need to call emit_support_tinfo_1 on
each of the types (see how fundamentals is used at the end of the
function), no need to put everything in the array.
--
Marc Glisse
, as in the
original testcase in the PR, we won't notice that those are the original
vectors. Still, better than nothing...
(we output a vzeroupper for the testcase, that seems unnecessary)
Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-06-22 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR target/44551
it.
Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-06-21 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR target/61503
* config/i386/i386.md (x86_64_shrd, x86_shrd): Replace ashiftrt
with lshiftrt.
--
Marc GlisseIndex: gcc/config/i386/i386.md
differently from regular function calls.
--
Marc Glisse
at -O0 (and vice versa), but it might be redundant with
some other tests.
Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-06-10 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR target/50829
gcc/
* config/i386/sse.md (enum unspec): Remove UNSPEC_CAST.
(avx_castmodeavxsizesuffix_castmode
to return a canonical type.
I doubt the patch can be wrong, but it may be that this is a situation
that is not supposed to happen and should be fixed elsewhere?
Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-06-09 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR c++/54442
gcc/
* tree.c
On Mon, 9 Jun 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/09/2014 10:18 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
I doubt the patch can be wrong, but it may be that this is a situation
that is not supposed to happen and should be fixed elsewhere?
Seems likely. What is the difference between the type returned from
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 06/06/2014 04:16 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
abi_check is broken before my patch (134 incompatible symbols).
Isn't broken for me, though. Likewise, AFAICS, on gcc-testresults. I would
recommend investigating in some detail what's going on at your end
it as a pass.
2014-06-06 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR libstdc++/43622
gcc/cp/
* rtti.c (emit_support_tinfos): Handle __float128.
libstdc++-v3/
* config/abi/pre/float128.ver: New file.
* configure.ac: Use float128.ver when relevant.
* configure: Regenerate
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
here is a new try on adding __float128 typeinfo to libsupc++. The front-end
part is based on the discussion with Jason yesterday. The libstdc++ part is
copied from
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/06/2014 10:16 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
* config/abi/pre/float128.ver: New file.
+CXXABI_FLOAT128_1.3.9 {
What's your rationale for keeping this in a separate version block rather
than in 1.3.9 (like __int128)?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 06/06/2014 11:58 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jun 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
What's your rationale for keeping this in a separate version block
rather than in 1.3.9 (like __int128)?
Powerpc already has those symbols in CXXABI_LDBL_1.3
, etc.
bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu as usual.
2014-06-04 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR tree-optimization/61385
gcc/
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (value_replacement): Replace singleton PHIs
with assignments.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr61385.c: New
On Wed, 4 Jun 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
So I'd say we should instead simply bail out if the middle-bb has a PHI node.
Sounds good to me, so I am testing the mini-patch I had originally posted
to bugzilla:
2014-06-04 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR tree-optimization/61385
type is not in the
list 0/float/double/long double. I think it should be ok with arm (it
would be good if they removed their unused XFmode, but I don't even think
it is necessary).
Is that what you were suggesting? I'll try to write a patch, thanks.
--
Marc Glisse
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, 2 Jun 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
(plus (bit_not @0) @0)
if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0)))
{ build_int_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0), -1); })
+(match_and_simplify
+ (plus @0 (bit_not @0))
+ if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0
yesterday).
2014-06-03 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR tree-optimization/61385
gcc/
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (value_replacement): Copy PHI nodes before
removing the basic block.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr61385.c: New file.
--
Marc GlisseIndex: gcc/testsuite
Ping?
On Sat, 17 May 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Ping Jakub?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01104.html
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Thanks for the comments!
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Jakub
On Tue, 3 Jun 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jun 3, 2014 at 3:48 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
apparently it is possible to have a PHI in the middle basic block of
value_replacement, so I need to move it as well when I move the statement
and remove the block
(bit_not @0))
{ build_all_ones_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); })
? Works for vector/complex, I don't know what type a bit_not_expr can have
where the simplification wouldn't be true.
--
Marc Glisse
.
--
Marc Glisse
constexpr, we
shouldn't define those macros lightly.
--
Marc Glisse
On Fri, 30 May 2014, Ed Smith-Rowland wrote:
+#define __cpp_lib_constexpr_functions 201210
appears quite a few times, I believe it will warn with -Wsystem-headers. I
think you should check if it is already defined (or undefine it first).
(you forgot to Cc: libstdc++)
--
Marc Glisse
. In the comments of that PR, Honza seems to have a different
idea of what the fold-const test should look like.
--
Marc Glisse
On Mon, 26 May 2014, Patrick Palka wrote:
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 26 May 2014, Patrick Palka wrote:
This patch teaches the C++ frontend to warn on NULL checks against
inline functions and it teaches the middle-end to fold NULL checks
On Wed, 21 May 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/25/2014 05:04 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Does this approach seem ok, or do we need to try harder to find a way to
get this typeinfo into libsupc++?
The latter, I think; these are base types, so they should go in the library.
Hmm, ok. Because
Ping
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00590.html
(note that ARM seems to be doing the same thing for their neon intrinsics,
see Ramana's patch series posted today)
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
the previous
Ping Jakub?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01104.html
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Thanks for the comments!
On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
The passes.def change makes me
Ping.
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00051.html
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
inlining operator new (with LTO or otherwise), I noticed that it has a
complicated implementation, which makes it hard to use
On Sat, 10 May 2014, Andrew Pinski wrote:
On Sat, May 10, 2014 at 3:53 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
in my recent phiopt patch enhancing value_replacement to optimize
x!=0?x+y:y, I forgot to check that there is no other PHI (not sure how I
managed to miss that since I
in the function.
Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-05-12 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR tree-optimization/61140
gcc/
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (value_replacement): Punt on multiple phis.
gcc/testsuite/
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr61140.c: New file.
--
Marc GlisseIndex: gcc
think of another way...
--
Marc Glisse
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01651.html
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
the previous patch had to be reverted as it broke the strange handling of
vectors in the ARM target. This new patch should be much more conservative
, type_traits and
numeric_limits).
--
Marc Glisse
substituting the tested value and see if the result matches the other phi
argument (it might handle (a!=b)?a|b:a for instance), instead of the
*_element_p tests. I may try that later, but I guess the current patch is
good enough for now.
2014-05-06 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR tree
to __FLOAT128__). If you really don't like it, we can
ask x86 maintainers if they like __FLOAT128__.
--
Marc Glisse
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00590.html
(note that ARM seems to be doing the same thing for their neon
intrinsics, see Ramana's patch series posted today)
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
the previous discussion on the topic was before we added all those
say, it is well defined
(except when finite-math-only is in effect). If you want a meta-category
for this kind of valid thing, maybe -fsanitize=unusual or
-fsanitize=suspicious.
--
Marc Glisse
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/04/14 20:03 +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
Grep seems to indicate that the manual is the only other place that needs
updating, but that can wait.
Is this patch ok, assuming the tests pass?
OK, and sorry for forgetting about that file
, both
regtested fine.
Does this approach seem ok, or do we need to try harder to find a way to
get this typeinfo into libsupc++?
2014-04-25 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR libstdc++/43622
* rtti.c (emit_support_tinfos): Move the array...
(fundamentals
On Fri, 25 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
the previous patch had to be reverted as it broke the strange handling of
vectors in the ARM target. This new patch should be much more conservative I
hope. Instead of adding this typeinfo to libsupc++, I am letting the FE know
that it isn't available
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 8:43 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/13/2014 01:41 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch generates typeinfo for target types. On x86_64, it adds
quite some time back so there is some digging needed here.
Problematic part of the patch was reverted, arm and aarch64 should be ok
now. Please do investigate...
--
Marc Glisse
On Thu, 24 Apr 2014, Rainer Orth wrote:
Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr writes:
this is a follow-up for this patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00618.html
once committed, g++ will generate typeinfo for __float128, and it needs
versioning. While there, I noticed
, instead of
forbidden, you said move the attribute so users would know that
writing the attribute *before* was fine? That sounded much better to me.
--
Marc Glisse
Honza, any comment on Richard's question?
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
+ /* If the special case has a high probability, keep it. */
+ if (EDGE_PRED (middle_bb
(Adding an i386 maintainer in Cc)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00620.html
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
some people like having a macro to test if a type is available
(__SIZEOF_INT128__ for instance). This adds macros for __float80 and
__float128. The types
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 04/13/2014 01:41 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this patch generates typeinfo for target types. On x86_64, it adds these 6
lines to nm -C libsupc++.a. A follow-up patch will be needed to export and
version those in the shared library
)
threshold = PROB_EVEN;
if (EDGE_PRED (middle_bb, 0)-probability threshold)
return 0;
Is that ok, after re-testing?
--
Marc Glisse
On Wed, 23 Apr 2014, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
(Adding an i386 maintainer in Cc)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00620.html
On Sun, 13 Apr 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
some people like having a macro to test
.
--
Marc Glisse
On Tue, 22 Apr 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14 April 2014 11:28, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 14 April 2014 10:39, Marc Glisse wrote:
PR libstdc++/43622
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver (CXXABI_1.3.9): New version, new symbols.
* config/abi/pre/gnu-versioned-namespace.ver
-04-23 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR libstdc++/43622
* config/abi/pre/float128.ver: New file.
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver (CXXABI_1.3.9): Move __float128 typeinfo to
the new file.
* config/abi/post/x86_64-linux-gnu/baseline_symbols.txt: Update
is smaller than op0_subop1. Starting from a vector of size
2, extracting {1,0,1,0} then {3,0} gives the initial vector just fine.
--
Marc Glisse
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01480.html
On Thu, 23 Jan 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
although setting CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET before compiling gcc works fine,
CXXFLAGS_FOR_TARGET is ignored. I don't see any good reason for that.
I tested the patch by doing a regular
== LT_EXPR
+ || exp_code == GT_EXPR)
Is there a TREE_CODE_CLASS or a #define for this?
truth_value_p
--
Marc Glisse
one, so I think we should be ok, but I don't mind treating calloc like
malloc here if you think it is too risky, I don't think people call
strlen(calloc(a,b)) very often, and it would let me remove the don't use
si-length comment.
Updated and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-04-18 Marc
On Thu, 17 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
This fixes PR60849 by properly rejecting non-boolean typed
comparisons from valid_gimple_rhs_p so they go through the
gimplification paths.
Could you also accept vector comparisons please?
--
Marc Glisse
new types, no need to touch the array.
Do the entries in the array need to be in a particular order?
No, any random order would do.
--
Marc Glisse
Manuel insists regularly that no new warning should
use 0 (and old ones should progressively lose it).
--
Marc Glisse
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 04/14/2014 06:02 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
shouldn't the same also apply if VECTOR_TYPE_P (type), not just for
CLASS_TYPE_P (type)?
Sure. Do you want to make that change?
I can add || VECTOR_TYPE_P (type), yes, but I thought you might have ideas
Ping
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg00051.html
On Sun, 2 Mar 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
inlining operator new (with LTO or otherwise), I noticed that it has a
complicated implementation, which makes it hard to use this inlined code for
optimizations. This patch does two
Let me ping this. There's no hurry, but it may have got lost with 4.9
approaching.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-03/msg01205.html
On Sun, 23 Mar 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
That's a bit much of ad-hoc pattern-matching ... wouldn't be
p
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
It's just vectors, because they're an extension; the patch I checked in
covered the standard language.
Like this? (regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu)
2014-04-16 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
gcc/cp/
* decl.c (reshape_init_r): Handle
On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Anyway, the real issue is indeed that implementing those bits requires a new
virtual function, and that would break the ABI.
What is the status of the ABI half-break plan (abi_tag and such),
necessary to get the remaining pieces of C++11?
--
Marc
:_ZNSt20bad_array_new_lengthC2Ev@@CXXABI_1.3.8
FUNC:_ZNSt14numeric_limitsIdE8infinityEv@@GLIBCXX_3.4
FUNC:_ZN10__cxxabiv117__class_type_info16__dyncast_resultC1Ei@@CXXABI_1.3
etc.
Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-04-14 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR libstdc++/43622
);
+}
+ return val;
+}
If val is NULL, it seems you still end up looking at its TREE_CODE?
(don't know if that can happen)
In C++, default_conversion probably handles IDENTIFIER_NODE just fine, but
having different code for the 2 languages would not be nice, right?
--
Marc Glisse
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
+ /* If the special case has a high probability, keep it. */
+ if (EDGE_PRED (middle_bb, 0)-probability PROB_EVEN)
I suppose Honza has a comment on how to test this properly
(not sure if -probability or -frequency is always initialized properly).
the same also apply if VECTOR_TYPE_P (type), not just for
CLASS_TYPE_P (type)?
Testcase in:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/23070982/c-initialization-of-intel-simd-intrinsics-class-members
--
Marc Glisse
On Mon, 14 Apr 2014, DJ Delorie wrote:
* rtti.c (emit_support_tinfos): Remove __int128-specific entries.
Hello,
I wanted to check the interaction with:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg00618.html
but I don't see where you moved the __int128 typeinfo generation.
*
+ V typeinfo for __float128*
+ V typeinfo name for __float128
+ V typeinfo name for __float128 const*
+ V typeinfo name for __float128*
Bootstrap and testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu (a bit of noise in
tsan/tls_race.c).
2014-04-13 Marc
+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-04-13 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR preprocessor/56540
* config/i386/i386-c.c (ix86_target_macros): Define
__SIZEOF_FLOAT80__ and __SIZEOF_FLOAT128__.
--
Marc GlisseIndex: gcc/config/i386/i386-c.c
On Mon, 3 Mar 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr wrote:
Hello,
again, a stage 1 patch that I will ping then, but early comments are
welcome.
PR 59100 was asking to transform n?rotate(x,n):x to rotate(x,n) (because it
can be hard
won't do it again in the future :-)
--
Marc Glisse
date)
--
Marc Glisse
On Wed, 5 Mar 2014, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 5 March 2014 19:36, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
this issue got delayed in LWG, apparently because of a failed improvement
to the wording along the way (happens, that's ok), but there seems to be a
consensus on the resolution and I don't really see
waiting to see if
this patch is accepted before doing more.
Bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-04-11 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
* config/i386/xmmintrin.h (_mm_add_ps, _mm_sub_ps, _mm_mul_ps,
_mm_div_ps, _mm_store_ss, _mm_cvtss_f32): Use vector extensions
should be counted from two, not one, when giving
values for string-index and first-to-check.
It would be strange to count arguments differently for different
attributes.
--
Marc Glisse
(gimple_location (stmt), OPT_Wreturn_local_addr,
+ function returns address of local variable))
That's a front-end option, I should either move it to gcc/common.opt or
use a different option.
--
Marc Glisse
On Mon, 7 Apr 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/05/14 07:52, Marc Glisse wrote:
Hello,
we have front-end warnings about returning the address of a local
variable. However, quite often in C++, people don't directly return the
address of a temporary, it goes through a few functions which hide
the return value
in those cases, we can warn, but maybe we don't want to introduce a trap?
Replacing the address with a null pointer seemed like a compromise, it
will trap when you try to read it, but not if you ignore it. But if you
think we can trap, ok.
--
Marc Glisse
fix PR 60517, for that I was thinking of checking
for memory reads if the first stop of walk_aliased_vdefs is a clobber
(could also check __builtin_free), though I don't know in which pass to do
that yet.
2014-04-05 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR c++/60517
gcc/c/
* c
provably instead of probably in the first two?
--
Marc Glisse
in b-a. Richard+GSoC will supposedly soon provide a
function that does that.
--
Marc Glisse
like long long (HOST_WIDEST_INT?)
make more sense than unsigned?
--
Marc Glisse
entries, but don't be surprised when some go missing.
--
Marc Glisse
be another option I guess (it would require
implementing the clone method), but without a testcase showing it is
needed...
Passes bootstrap+testsuite on x86_64-linux-gnu.
2014-03-23 Marc Glisse marc.gli...@inria.fr
PR tree-optimization/57742
gcc/
* tree-ssa-strlen.c
yet:
http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/FormattingCodeForGCC
(you can wrap that in a function and use an autocmd to enable it only for
some directories for instance)
--
Marc Glisse
901 - 1000 of 1572 matches
Mail list logo
