On 2019-02-07 3:09 p.m., Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 03:04:21PM -0500, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> 2019-02-07 Michael Ploujnikov
>>
>> PR middle-end/89150
>> * bitmap.c (test_bitmap_tree_marking): New test.
>> (NOT
ree patch, the issue is only latent on trunk
> (together with another unfixed pch issue of bitmaps).
My apologies for not noticing this thread/PR earlier. I originally discovered
this issue while working on an experimental patch, but since then I've also
come up with a test case for this speci
of security).
- Michael
From 3433efe4ac558de05410a9b185f4ff0a01e7e5df Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ploujnikov
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2019 09:22:14 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] Document how to hash based on key string contents.
gcc:
2019-01-18 Michael Ploujnikov
* hash-map-tests.c
On 2018-12-06 3:13 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> Thanks to Martin we now have a test that exercises (cp) cloning
> machinery during the WPA stage of LTO.
>
> Also, during debugging I found that print_all_lattices would trigger
> an assert if I tried to
as a bonus.
Bootstrapping (--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto) and regression testing on
x86_64.
Ok for trunk after tests pass?
- Michael
From f8f59d44141726e688cde077aabb5f2ce0bf53e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ploujnikov
Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 13:36:51 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Skip
On 2018-12-04 7:48 a.m., Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 04 2018, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>
>> I've tried building with numbered_clone_function_name replaced by
>> suffixed_function_name and with --enable-offload-targets=hsa and
>> didn't see any
On 2018-12-03 12:00 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-12-01 11:29 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
>> This caused:
>>
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297
>>
>
> Sorry about that. Looks like I should have been testing with
> --with-build-config=boo
On 2018-12-01 11:29 a.m., H.J. Lu wrote:
> This caused:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297
>
Sorry about that. Looks like I should have been testing with
--with-build-config=bootstrap-lto rather than just --enable-bootstrap.
The quick fix would be to undo the patch to
OK with those changes.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard.
Thank you for the review. I will commit as soon as my last test run finishes.
- Michael
From ac1f1579d37804c97833d460ec6cd5b87d6184c7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ploujnikov
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:57:30 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3]
On 2018-11-28 5:49 p.m., Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Nov 28, 2018 at 04:09:14PM -0500, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> I've also included a small change to rs6000 which I'm pretty sure is
>> safe, but I have no way of testing.
>
> Do you have an acco
for trunk?
- Michael
From 40cb5c888522d69bc42791f0c884dcb9e29eff37 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ploujnikov
Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2018 12:57:30 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Make function assembly more independent.
This is achieved by having clone_function_name assign unique clone
numbers for each
On 2018-11-12 12:50 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-11-02 1:59 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> I came across this typo and also added a similar ld invocation for
>> illustration purposes as mentioned by Jakub on irc.
>>
>
> After talking to Jakub abou
On 2018-11-02 1:59 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> I came across this typo and also added a similar ld invocation for
> illustration purposes as mentioned by Jakub on irc.
>
After talking to Jakub about it, I went with different terminology.
- Mic
I came across this typo and also added a similar ld invocation for
illustration purposes as mentioned by Jakub on irc.
From 2df4903f04fbe68e9e6a1ae0eea460e7592a8512 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ploujnikov
Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 13:40:50 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Fix weakref description
On 2018-10-29 6:49 a.m., Martin Liška wrote:
> On 10/29/18 9:40 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 10/27/18 6:15 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2018-10-26 10:25 a.m., Jan Hubicka wrote:
>>>>> From aea94273e7a477a03d1ee10a5d9043d6d1
Hi,
On 2018-10-26 10:25 a.m., Jan Hubicka wrote:
>> From aea94273e7a477a03d1ee10a5d9043d6d13b8e8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Michael Ploujnikov
>> Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:16:36 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] Avoid unnecessarily numbering cloned symbols.
>>
>
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the review.
On 2018-10-26 03:51 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 10/26/18 12:59 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> I've taken the advice from a discussion on IRC and re-wrote the patch
>> with more uniform function names and using overloading.
>>
>
to be like that unless ASM_FORMAT_PRIVATE_NAME making the
number optional.
From 0df79d0ac6a9891b344f988c7157a54cebbc1cb8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ploujnikov
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2018 13:16:36 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Avoid unnecessarily numbering cloned symbols.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-10-25
On 2018-10-21 09:14 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> Continuing from https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg01258.html
>
> Fixed up the code after the change to concat suggested by Bernhard
> Reutner.
>
> Outstanding question still remains:
>
> To wr
prefix by mistake?
- Michael
From 74435e1d8c5984eaee766d7940eeffbe565fcc2e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ploujnikov
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 20:36:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Rename clone_function_name_1 and clone_function_name to
clarify usage.
gcc:
2018-10-19 Michael Ploujnikov
On 2018-10-20 07:39 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On 20 October 2018 00:26:15 CEST, Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
>> While working on
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-09/msg00228.html I've
>> accumulated a few easy patches.
>
>
> +/* Return
that they don't need to be numbered.
Regards,
- Michael
From 0bbcf3b8c20498f4d861e088ff7ab38e2a43800b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Ploujnikov
Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2018 20:36:53 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Rename clone_function_name_1 and clone_function_name to
clarify usage.
gcc:
2018-10-19
Hi Martin,
On 2018-09-03 06:01 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Aug 31 2018, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> I've done some more digging into the current uses of
>> numbered_clone_function_name and checked if any tests fail if I change
>> it to suffixed_f
Hi Martin, Richard,
Thanks for your responses.
On 2018-09-03 09:15 AM, Martin Jambor wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 03 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 12:02 PM Martin Jambor wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 31 2018,
On 2018-08-13 07:58 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> Ping and I've updated the patch since last time as follows:
>
> - unittest scans assembly rather than the constprop dump because its
> forward changed
> - unittests should handle different hosts where any of
>
bootstrapped and regtested.
- Michael
On 2018-08-02 03:05 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-08-01 06:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:40 PM Michael Ploujnikov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2018-07-26 01:27 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>>&g
On 2018-08-01 06:37 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 7:40 PM Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-07-26 01:27 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-24 09:57 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>>> On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richar
On 2018-07-26 01:27 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-07-24 09:57 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>> On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>> /* Return a new assembler name for a clone with SUFFIX of a decl named
>>>> NAME. *
On 2018-07-24 09:57 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> /* Return a new assembler name for a clone with SUFFIX of a decl named
>>> NAME. */
>>> @@ -521,14 +521,13 @@ tree
>>> clone_function_name_
On 2018-07-20 06:05 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 4:48 AM Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-07-17 04:25 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-17 06:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10
On 2018-07-17 04:25 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> On 2018-07-17 06:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 16 July 2018 21:38:36 CEST, Michael Ploujnikov
>>> wrote:
>>&
On 2018-07-17 06:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 8:10 AM Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> wrote:
>>
>> On 16 July 2018 21:38:36 CEST, Michael Ploujnikov
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>
>>> +clone_fn_ids = hash_map::crea
impact as the only user of the clone names that I
found (https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2013-03/msg00268.html) doesn't actually care
about the specific numeric values.
Thanks
- Michael
gcc:
2018-07-16 Michael Ploujnikov
Make function clone name numbering independent
33 matches
Mail list logo
