On 05/31/2011 02:18 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:08 PM, Pat Haugen
pthau...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote:
The following patch fixes an issue I noticed where vr0..vr2 were
inadvertently included in NON_FLOAT_REGS.
Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new
The following patch fixes an issue I noticed where vr0..vr2 were inadvertently
included in NON_FLOAT_REGS.
Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
-Pat
2011-05-31 Pat Haugen pthau...@us.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (REG_CLASS_CONTENTS
when a cost
calculation requires going through memory or GPRs.
Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux with no new regressions. Ok for trunk?
-Pat
2011-05-25 Pat Haugen pthau...@us.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_register_move_cost): Preserve from
parameter value
On 04/12/2011 08:22 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 04:00:45PM -0500, Pat Haugen wrote:
--- gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (revision 172327)
+++ gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c (working copy)
@@ -7976,7 +7976,7 @@ call_ABI_of_interest (tree fndecl)
return true
Discussed the following with Martin on irc to bring rs6000 target up to date
with his changes to the cgraph code. Bootstrap/regtest on powerpc64-linux.
Committed as obvious.
-Pat
2011-04-12 Pat Haugen pthau...@us.ibm.com
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (call_ABI_of_interest): Call
The following changes are already present on trunk as part of the fix for
PR44364. Not having them on 4.5 caused problems with the subject fix when trying
to spill FP regs with a stack 32K.
Bootstrap/regtest 4.5 branch on powerpc with no new failures, ok for 4.5?
-Pat
2011-03-15 Pat
201 - 206 of 206 matches
Mail list logo
