Hello,
Ping!
I would like to get a return on this patch. I don't know quite well the
status of libiberty in GNU, please if I must this patch on another
mailing list, please say me on which.
Thanks!
Pierre Vittet
with a
multiple of 64 size, so we can call md5_process_block. We only call
md5_process_bytes for the last data.
Thanks!
Pierre Vittet
2011-09-19 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt-runtime.c (meltgc_string_hex_md5sum_file_sequence): Concatenate
files stream to call md5_process_block
the code. I searched on google, and it does not looks
to be used. Does anyone want it or thing that it should not be removed?
Ok for trunk ?
Thanks!
Pierre Vittet
PS: I also write a small gcc plugin, allowing to easily test
md5_process_bytes, if can change your environment in a way where
of a strbuf.
Pierre Vittet
Index: gcc/melt/warmelt-base.melt
===
--- gcc/melt/warmelt-base.melt (revision 176434)
+++ gcc/melt/warmelt-base.melt (working copy)
@@ -272,6 +272,11 @@ number $NUM opaque location number $LOC.}#
:doc
Hello,
This is a small patch adding primitive isnull_tree (as there is already
a primitive isnull_basicblock).
Pierre Vittet
Index: gcc/melt/xtramelt-ana-base.melt
===
--- gcc/melt/xtramelt-ana-base.melt (révision 178282
beyond (but there are
still issues.
Pierre Vittet
Index: melt-build.tpl
===
--- melt-build.tpl (révision 178131)
+++ melt-build.tpl (copie de travail)
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ ENDFOR melt_translator_file+]
[+FOR melt_translator_file
Hello,
this patch correct the function meltgc_string_hex_md5sum_file_sequence,
it now returns the same than cat myfile1 myfile2 ... | md5sum.
fread was not correctly used + it looks like you can't mix function
md5_process_bytes and md5_process_blocks.
Pierre Vittet
Index: gcc/melt-runtime.c
Hello,
This minor patch add a primitive to get a list of s-expression from a
boxed C string of a strbuf.
This is only the MELT part, as the called C code was already written.
I compiled and test it.
Thanks!
Pierre Vittet
2011-07-18 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt/warmelt
Right, here is the new version of the patch (with the correct files).
I added, a function register_pre_genericize_hook in
melt/warmelt-base.melt to be called when we want to register a MELT
function to handle the callback, so we don't manually set
sysdata_pre_genericize field.
Pierre Vittet
warmelt-upgrade must be run in order to
regenerate generated melt files.
The add_pre_genericize_hook patch add a function (in melt-runtime.c) to
be called on PLUGIN_PRE_GENERICIZE, which call the closure
sysdata_pre_genericize defined by the users.
Thanks
Pierre Vittet
2011-07-15 Pierre
with care,
as we can only register a single pragma named melt (maybe we could use
another function specially for 4.6 ?).
Thanks!
Pierre Vittet
2011-07-07 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt/warmelt-base.melt (register_pragma_handler ): new function.
Index: gcc/melt/warmelt-base.melt
an important space
complexity.
Thanks!
Pierre Vittet
being registered. I also
removed the PRAGMA_BAD macro as it was said to be less readable, and
changed malformed pragma warnings into errors.
I tested the patch without seing any error or regression.
Pierre Vittet
2011-07-03 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt-runtime.c: include c
of arguments as parameters.
For GCC=4.6, there is a minimal pragma support, we can handle following
pragma:
#pragma GCCPLUGIN melt op (arg1,...argN)
with only melt as name.
ChangeLog:
2011-06-24 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt-runtime.c (GCC_PRAGMA_BAD): Macro to return an error
it doesn't handle correctly the absence of file.
This patch correct this, if there is no file, it create a virtual one
which is named stringBuffer.
Pierre Vittet
Index: gcc/melt-runtime.c
===
--- gcc/melt-runtime.c (revision 175348
.
I took this opportunity to add a small comment to the function (in the
second diff).
ChangeLog
2011-06-21 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt-runtime.c (meltgc_new_split_string): Fix issue.
2011-06-21 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt-runtime.c
thanks!
I formatted as you requested.
I cannot commit myself as I haven't a write after approval status,
maye you can do it, or I can wait my GSOC mentor, Basile Starynkevitch
to do this (He mights be busy for a few days).
Pierre Vittet
Index: gcc/c-family/c-pragma.c
I guess this is better now.
Changelog (gcc/c-family):
2011-06-10 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* c-pragma.h (pragma_handler_1arg, pragma_handler_2arg): New handler.
(gen_pragma_handler): New union.
(internal_pragma_handler): New type.
(c_register_pragma_with_data
You are right, the new version is in the diff.
The diff for the test hasn't changed and is in the previous mail.
In the previous version of the file, the registered_pragmas was not
better freed. I don't know if it is really important (it would need a
callback at the end of the front-end
, if there is a remark,
please, send me it. Especially, I am not sure about the format of my
ChangeLog, if there is an issue, I am ready to change it.
Changelog gcc:
2011-06-08 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* c-pragma.h (pragma_handler_1arg, pragma_handler_2arg,
gen_pragma_handler
to keep a more clear code. I can do it, if you
think it is better.
I have successfully compiled gcc with my patch and I have tried it with
a modified version of gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/plugin/pragma_plugin.c.
Pierre Vittet
On 02/06/2011 19:51, Tom Tromey wrote:
Pierre == Pierrep.vit
comfortable with
it for now ;).
Pierre Vittet
On 03/06/2011 17:47, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 17:31:25 +0200
Pierre Vittetpier...@pvittet.com wrote:
Thank you for your answer!
I send you a new patch
I have corrected the errors you raised.
I have make my patch compatible
)
)
(put_fields
initial_system_data
:sysdata_meltpragma_definer my_simple_pragma_handler
)
Pierre Vittet
Index: gcc/melt/warmelt-first.melt
===
--- gcc/melt/warmelt-first.melt (revision 174379)
+++ gcc/melt/warmelt-first.melt (working
is that it puts an end of lines between the
two informations. If you think there is a best way to do this, I am ok
to try it.
The new changelog:
2011-05-20 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
* melt/xtramelt-ana-base.melt
(is_dominance_info_available, is_post_dominance_info_available
So maybe this patch adding a comment on calculate_dominance_info is more
adapted.
ChangeLog:
2011-05-17 Pierre Vittetpier...@pvittet.com
* dominance.c (calculate_dominance_info): Add comment
precising when to free with free_dominance_info
contributor number: 634276
Index:
This patch correct a bug in the current revision of MELT, which was
preventing MELT to run correctly.
This was a path problem in gcc/Makefile.in (melt-modules/ and
melt-modules.mk) were not found.
My contributor number is 634276.
changelog :
2011-05-17 Pierre Vittet pier...@pvittet.com
a MELT plugin with the patched version).
I have also measured a small time improvement while compiling the file
gcc.c (which is more that 8000 lines):
Whithout the modification:
usersys
1.563 0.145s
With the modification:
usersys
1.144 0.106s
Changelog:
2011-05-09 Pierre Vittet pier
.
This is the copyright assignment legal document reference for Pierre Vittet.
What does he (or me) have to do to get svn+ssh://gcc.melt.org/ write access?
Cheers.
that the function print_current_pass is only
called on a fail and that debug_pass doesn't appear to be called at all.
Maybe in DEBUG, or at least with an f*_dump_all, we could print the
order of the pass.
thanks
Pierre Vittet
Index: gcc/tree-dump.c
29 matches
Mail list logo
