On Sun, Oct 01, 2017 at 11:58:30AM +0200, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
> For the approach pluto is taking, you'll have to look at the source
> code, see pluto_intra_tile_optimize_band.
> For the other two approaches I mentioned above, reports will
> be made available within the next cou
On Sat, Sep 30, 2017 at 07:47:43PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On September 29, 2017 9:58:41 PM GMT+02:00, Sebastian Pop <seb...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >On Fri, Sep 29, 2017 at 2:37 PM, Sven Verdoolaege
> ><sven.verdoola...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> [Sorry
[Sorry for the resend; I used the wrong email address to CC Alex]
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Ah, so I now see why we do not perform interchange on trivial cases like
>
> double A[1024][1024], B[1024][1024];
>
> void foo(void)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i <
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 02:18:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> Ah, so I now see why we do not perform interchange on trivial cases like
>
> double A[1024][1024], B[1024][1024];
>
> void foo(void)
> {
> for (int i = 0; i < 1024; ++i)
> for (int j = 0; j < 1024; ++j)
> A[j][i] =
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:19:50AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Sven, is there already a function that computes the sum of all
> strides in a proximity map? Maybe you have code that does
> something similar in pet or ppcg?
What exactly do you want to sum?
If this involves any counting, then it
On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 04:05:57PM +0100, Mircea Namolaru wrote:
I'm not sure if Tobi or Albert have told you, but the separation_class
option
is going to be phased out since its design is fundamentally flawed.
If you can't wait until isl-0.15, then I guess you have no choice but
to use
On Sat, Nov 08, 2014 at 12:32:05AM +0100, Mircea Namolaru wrote:
Hello,
This is the patch for unroll and jam optimizations. It is based on the
code written by Tobias from graphite-optimize-isl.c (the code was
unreachable till now) extended and enabled it via a new option
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 02:12:54AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
@@ -160,6 +182,14 @@ pbb_strip_mine_time_depth (poly_bb_p pbb, int
time_depth, int stride)
ppl_delete_Linear_Expression (expr);
ppl_Polyhedron_add_constraint (res, new_cstr);
ppl_delete_Constraint (new_cstr);
+
+
Shouldn't you document that you need isl now?
skimo
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 05:44:37PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+ ctx = isl_ctx_alloc ();
I can't find the call to cloog_isl_state_malloc in this patch
that Tobi correctly requested.
skimo
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 10:16:05AM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
---
gcc/doc/install.texi |8 +++-
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/install.texi b/gcc/doc/install.texi
index 368221f..f2b2fd9 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/install.texi
+++
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 05:02:18PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+@item Integer Set Library (ISL) version 0.08
+
+Necessary to build GCC with the Graphite loop optimizations.
+It can be downloaded from @uref{http://www.kotnet.org/~skimo/isl/}.
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 06:56:38PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
I don't see why that should make any difference to the build requirements.
If CLooG-ISL builds and installs a library libisl.a as well as
libcloog-isl.a (as config/cloog.m4 thinks it does at present), why should
someone need
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG *first*, then ISL, so that ISL's
libisl.a overwrites CLooG's rather than the other way round (supposing
that they
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:28:52PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Sven Verdoolaege wrote:
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 07:16:55PM +, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
Do you mean there is not only a requirement to build both libraries, but
there is a requirement to build CLooG
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 03:30:25PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote:
Skimo,
Currently we don't have any checks for the minimal isl version required.
I assume they will be added at some point.
AFAIU, Sebastian just started working on this.
It will take some time for him to finish the transition.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:16:45PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+ if (1)
+{
+ /* For now remove the isl_id's from the context before
+ translating to CLooG: this code will be removed when the
+ domain will also contain isl_id's. */
+ isl_set *context =
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 08:14:05PM +0100, Tobias Grosser wrote:
I think the best would be to provide our ctx to cloog when allocating
the CloogState.
Yes.
skimo
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 03:10:30PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 14:28, Sven Verdoolaege sk...@kotnet.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 01:16:45PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+
+ /* FIXME: This function will be renamed isl_map_insert_dims and
+ documented
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 03:23:13PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
As we are using this function only on parameters, get_name should
return a unique name. I guess that the name in isl_id is only used
for debugging purposes, as the ISL manual states that Identifiers
with the same name but
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 04:59:43PM -0500, Sebastian Pop wrote:
+ {
+ isl_dim *dc = isl_set_get_dim (scop-context);
+ int nb_in = isl_dim_size (dc, isl_dim_set);
+ int nb_out = 1 + DR_NUM_DIMENSIONS (dr);
+ int nbp = scop_nb_params (scop);
+ isl_dim *dim = isl_dim_alloc
21 matches
Mail list logo
