Re: [google-4.6]Backport r183875 to fix incorrect increment/decrement of atomic pointers (issue 6428056)

2012-07-19 Thread dougkwan
This seems to be different from r183875. Are the parts chaing is_look_free() in r183875 necessary? If not why? http://codereview.appspot.com/6428056/

Re: [google-4.6]Backport r183875 to fix incorrect increment/decrement of atomic pointers (issue 6428056)

2012-07-19 Thread dougkwan
LGTM. http://codereview.appspot.com/6428056/

Re: [google] Backport r177357 from trunk to google/gcc-4_6 (issue 4862042)

2011-08-16 Thread dougkwan
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/4862042/

Re: [google] Backport r175894 from gcc-4_6-branch to google/gcc-4_6 (issue4752052)

2011-07-18 Thread dougkwan
LGTM http://codereview.appspot.com/4752052/