-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 9:14 PM
On 04/30/2015 09:34 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 30, 2015 8:32 PM
/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
to output_constant_pool_2
On 04/29/2015 04:30 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
Jeff, I have made the changes as per your comments and attached the
patch.
If the patch is OK, I will proceed with the regression tests.
This patch refers back
/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
to output_constant_pool_2
On 04/28/2015 12:38 PM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jeff Law [mailto:l...@redhat.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 11:48 PM
To: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
/varasm.c : Pass actual alignment value
to output_constant_pool_2
On 04/28/2015 03:44 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
Ping.
-Original Message-
From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Sent: Friday, March 27, 2015 7:57 PM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; rguent...@suse.de; Jakub Jelinek
Cc: Alan
,
The subject line and thread may confuse people that this is a PowerPC-
specific issue. You need approval from a reviewer with authority over
varasm.c.
Thanks, David
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com
rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message
that this is a PowerPC-
specific issue. You need approval from a reviewer with authority over
varasm.c.
Thanks, David
On Thu, May 8, 2014 at 9:54 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com
rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alan Modra [mailto:amo...@gmail.com]
Sent
-Original Message-
From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:ma...@codesourcery.com]
To: Ulrich Weigand
Cc: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502; Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; David Edelsohn; gcc-
patc...@gcc.gnu.org; Alan Modra; Jakub Jelinek
Subject: Re: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc
From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2014 3:54 PM
From: Ulrich Weigand [mailto:uweig...@de.ibm.com] Maciej W. Rozycki
wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Edmar wrote:
Committed on trunk, revision 213596 Committed on 4.9 branch,
revision 213597
This change
From: Ulrich Weigand [mailto:uweig...@de.ibm.com]
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2014, Edmar wrote:
Committed on trunk, revision 213596
Committed on 4.9 branch, revision 213597
This change regressed GDB for e500v2 multilibs, presumably because it
does not understand
Jakub,
On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 11:51:34AM -0500, Edmar wrote:
Committed on trunk, revision 213596
Committed on 4.9 branch, revision 213597
Note the ChangeLog entry was grossly misformated.
I've fixed it up in gcc/ChangeLog on the trunk, but not on the branch
nor in libgcc. There
etc.]
I had updated the patch as required (For this last change, I have
checked/tested only the builds: ppc64 trunk, e500v2 v4.9.1 bareboard linux
build).
PR target/60102
[libgcc]
2014-07-31 Rohit rohitarul...@freescale.com
* config/rs6000/linux-unwind.h
Jakub,
On Fri, Aug 01, 2014 at 06:03:56PM +, rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
PR target/60102
--- libgcc/config/rs6000/linux-unwind.h (revision 213110)
+++ libgcc/config/rs6000/linux-unwind.h (working copy)
@@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ ppc_fallback_frame_state (struct _Unwind
#ifdef
on trunk [213030] GCC v4.9.1 with ppc64 and didn't find any
new regressions.
Back ported this patch on GCC v4.8.3 e500v2 and tested with no new regressions
PR target/60102
[libgcc]
2014-07-31 Rohit rohitarul...@freescale.com
* config/rs6000/linux-unwind.h (ppc_fallback_frame_state
Ping!
-Original Message-
From: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2014 8:13 AM
To: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Cc: Wienskoski Edmar-RA8797; dje@gmail.com; Alan Modra; Jakub Jelinek
Subject: [RFC: Patch, PR 60102] [4.9/4.10 Regression] powerpc fp-bit ices at
dwf_regno
Hello All,
This is related to the following bug:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60102
I have tried to fix the e500v2 build on GCC v4.9.0 with the attached patch.
Can you please review and comment on the changes especially DWARF_FRAME_REGNUM,
DWARF_REG_TO_UNWIND_COLUMN definitions?
, 2014 at 9:54 AM, rohitarul...@freescale.com
rohitarul...@freescale.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Alan Modra [mailto:amo...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 11:52 AM
To: Dharmakan Rohit-B30502
Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org; dje@gmail.com; Wienskoski
Edmar-RA8797
entries.
On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 02:57:38PM +, rohitarul...@freescale.com
wrote:
Source file: gcc-4.8.2/gcc/varasm.c
@@ -7120,7 +7120,7 @@
if (CONSTANT_POOL_ADDRESS_P (symbol))
{
desc = SYMBOL_REF_CONSTANT (symbol);
output_constant_pool_1 (desc, 1
Rohit rohitarul...@freescale.com
PR target/60158
* varasm.c (output_constant_pool_1): Pass actual alignment value to
output_constant_pool_2
to emit .fixup section.
[gcc/testsuite]
2014-04-22 Rohit rohitarul...@freescale.com
PR target/60158
* gcc.target/powerpc/pr60158.c: New
18 matches
Mail list logo
