Re: *ping* [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra

2012-10-27 Thread Thomas Koenig
Am 27.10.2012 01:41, schrieb Andreas Schwab: Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de writes: Index: trans.c === --- trans.c (revision 192638) +++ trans.c (working copy) @@ -814,26 +814,23 @@ gfc_allocate_allocatable

Re: *ping* [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra

2012-10-26 Thread Andreas Schwab
Thomas Koenig tkoe...@netcologne.de writes: Index: trans.c === --- trans.c (revision 192638) +++ trans.c (working copy) @@ -814,26 +814,23 @@ gfc_allocate_allocatable (stmtblock_t * block, tre } -/* Free a given

Re: *ping* [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra

2012-10-21 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hi Janus, In the docu of -Wall, there is a list of which switches are included, but -Wc-binding-type is missing. Maybe you can add it? And how about also adding a short docu paragraph for Wextra? I've added both items to the documentation as you suggested, and committed as rev. 192649. Here

*ping* [patch, fortran] Handle -Wextra, -fcompare-reals is implied with -Wextra

2012-09-28 Thread Thomas Koenig
I wrote: the attatched patch (this time for real!) implements -Wextra for the Fortran front end, and adds -fcompare-reals to -Wextra. Ping?