On 08/02/2018 04:27 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
I think the cse_cc pass is really just working around one or more bugs
in CSE and/or a backend bug. The RTL above clearly shows a common
subexpression that is not eliminated by CSE.
What CSE should be trying to do is changing the second and third
> 在 2018年8月3日，06:27，Jeff Law 写道：
>
> On 07/26/2018 12:06 AM, 瞿仙淼 wrote:
>>
>>> 在 2018年7月25日，上午5:24，Jeff Law 写道：
>>>
>>> On 07/24/2018 12:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
On 07/24/2018 09:45 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 07/23/2018 10:21 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> I'm not a big fan
On 07/27/2018 07:49 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 07/26/2018 12:06 AM, 瞿仙淼 wrote:
>>
>> I wrote a case to reproduce this problem on C-SKY. C code is as follows:
>> ---
>> int e1, e2;
>>
>> void func (int a, int b, int c, int d,
On 07/26/2018 12:06 AM, 瞿仙淼 wrote:
>
>> 在 2018年7月25日，上午5:24，Jeff Law 写道：
>>
>> On 07/24/2018 12:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>> On 07/24/2018 09:45 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/23/2018 10:21 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
I'm not a big fan of more awk code, but I'm not going to object to
On 07/26/2018 12:06 AM, 瞿仙淼 wrote:
I wrote a case to reproduce this problem on C-SKY. C code is as follows:
---
int e1, e2;
void func (int a, int b, int c, int d, int f, int g)
{
e1 = a > b ? f : g;
e2 = a > b ? c : d;
> 在 2018年7月25日，上午5:24，Jeff Law 写道：
>
> On 07/24/2018 12:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> On 07/24/2018 09:45 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 07/23/2018 10:21 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>> I'm not a big fan of more awk code, but I'm not going to object to it :-)
>>>
>>> Why does the port have
On 07/25/2018 07:16 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
Non-executable stacks are a very good thing.
That said, I also looked at the target hook documentation and was
left without any clue whatsoever. It sure isn't clear what powers of
two have to do with descriptors, or what descriptors have to do with
> On Jul 25, 2018, at 12:50 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
...
>>> It did. See TARGET_CUSTOM_FUNCTION_DESCRIPTORS and the (relatively few)
>>> ports that define it.
>>
>> Hmmm, I completely failed to make that connection from the docs -- the
>> whole description of that hook is pretty
On 07/24/2018 06:17 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 07/24/2018 03:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
Any thoughts on using the newer function descriptor bits rather than
old
style stack trampolines?
>>>
>>> Has that been committed? I vaguely remembered discussion of a new way
>>> to
On 07/24/2018 03:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
Any thoughts on using the newer function descriptor bits rather than old
style stack trampolines?
Has that been committed? I vaguely remembered discussion of a new way
to handle nested functions without using the trampoline interface, but I
couldn't
On 07/24/2018 12:18 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 07/24/2018 09:45 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 07/23/2018 10:21 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>>> 2018-07-23 Jojo
>>> Huibin Wang
>>> Sandra Loosemore
>>> Chung-Lin Tang
>>>
>>> C-SKY port:
On 07/24/2018 09:45 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 07/23/2018 10:21 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
2018-07-23 Jojo
Huibin Wang
Sandra Loosemore
Chung-Lin Tang
C-SKY port: Backend implementation
gcc/
* config/csky/*: New.
On 07/23/2018 10:21 PM, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> 2018-07-23 Jojo
> Huibin Wang
> Sandra Loosemore
> Chung-Lin Tang
>
> C-SKY port: Backend implementation
>
> gcc/
> * config/csky/*: New.
> * common/config/csky/*: New.
2018-07-23 Jojo
Huibin Wang
Sandra Loosemore
Chung-Lin Tang
C-SKY port: Backend implementation
gcc/
* config/csky/*: New.
* common/config/csky/*: New.
csky-gcc-2.patch.gz
Description: application/gzip
14 matches
Mail list logo
