Re: [2/6] Fold prev/next into gimple: fewer gimple_seq_alloc calls

2012-05-02 Thread Richard Guenther
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Michael Matz wrote: > Hi, > > This patch gets rid of some easy gimple_seq_alloc calls that we don't even > need currently because most gimple_seq modifier will lazily allocate one. > Most of the time it's enough to simply initialize a seq to NULL and call > the resp

[2/6] Fold prev/next into gimple: fewer gimple_seq_alloc calls

2012-05-01 Thread Michael Matz
Hi, This patch gets rid of some easy gimple_seq_alloc calls that we don't even need currently because most gimple_seq modifier will lazily allocate one. Most of the time it's enough to simply initialize a seq to NULL and call the respective routines like gimple_seq_add_{stmt,seq}. (A notable