On Wed, Nov 6, 2019 at 1:22 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:30 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> With a later patch I saw a case in which we peeled a single iteration
> >> for gaps but didn't need to peel further iterations to make up a
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:30 PM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> With a later patch I saw a case in which we peeled a single iteration
>> for gaps but didn't need to peel further iterations to make up a full
>> vector. We then tried to vectorise the single-iteration epilo
On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:30 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> With a later patch I saw a case in which we peeled a single iteration
> for gaps but didn't need to peel further iterations to make up a full
> vector. We then tried to vectorise the single-iteration epilogue.
But when peeling for gaps
With a later patch I saw a case in which we peeled a single iteration
for gaps but didn't need to peel further iterations to make up a full
vector. We then tried to vectorise the single-iteration epilogue.
2019-11-04 Richard Sandiford
gcc/
* tree-vect-loop.c (vect_analyze_loop): Only
