2013/4/23 Steven Bosscher stevenb@gmail.com:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros
2013/4/23 Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com:
On 13-04-22 2:19 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Chung-Ju Wu jasonw...@gmail.com wrote:
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for 4.9?
Yep.
Unfortunately, alphas are much more tied to reload than it was
On 2013-04-25 09:18, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Yes, this patch will work up to building libstdc++, where it will fail
with the same reason on movqi pattern (on non-BWX target). I suspect
that QImode access is generated during LRA (where reload_in_progress
is false!) and it directly generates movqi,
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjakubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjakubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law l...@redhat.com wrote:
Unfortunately, alphas are much more tied to reload than it was hoped.
While latest alphas (with FIX and BWX ISAs) survived transition to LRA
without problems, further testing on ev4 and ev5 triggered various
problems, one of
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjakubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c
On 13-04-22 2:19 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson r...@redhat.com
wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
I never tried alpha with LRA. So it is not assumed that LRA should work on
alpha. But I am sure LRA can work for alpha if some efforts will be spent.
Porting LRA to a new target always involves changes in .md and
On 13-04-22 3:35 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Vladimir Makarov vmaka...@redhat.com wrote:
I never tried alpha with LRA. So it is not assumed that LRA should work on
alpha. But I am sure LRA can work for alpha if some efforts will be spent.
Porting LRA to a new
Hello!
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for 4.9?
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg02998.html
Uros.
Index: config/alpha/alpha.c
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjakubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for 4.9?
Yep.
r~
On 01/28/2013 04:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak ubiz...@gmail.com
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for 4.9?
[1]
14 matches
Mail list logo
