On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 11:25 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Biener writes:
> > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Richard Sandiford
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> One of the warts of the vectoriser IR is that it doesn't link SSA name
> >> uses for pattern statements, leading to complicated special
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> One of the warts of the vectoriser IR is that it doesn't link SSA name
>> uses for pattern statements, leading to complicated special cases in
>> vect_mark_stmts_to_be_vectorized and (especially) vect_detect
On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 1:25 PM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> One of the warts of the vectoriser IR is that it doesn't link SSA name
> uses for pattern statements, leading to complicated special cases in
> vect_mark_stmts_to_be_vectorized and (especially) vect_detect_hybrid_slp.
> It also makes it
One of the warts of the vectoriser IR is that it doesn't link SSA name
uses for pattern statements, leading to complicated special cases in
vect_mark_stmts_to_be_vectorized and (especially) vect_detect_hybrid_slp.
It also makes it harder to check how an SSA name is used after pattern
replacement (s
