On 02/16/2016 05:37 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> See patch to fix this below.
>
Committed on trunk, r233500 after regression testing, -fsanitize=address
testing, and valgrind testing.
Jerry
On 16 February 2016 at 18:49, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> On 02/16/2016 12:06 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> On 15 February 2016 at 23:16, Janne Blomqvist
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Jerry DeLisle
>>>
See patch to fix this below.
On 02/16/2016 11:38 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
> With the following reduced test
>
> program test
> implicit none
> integer :: i, j, k, ios
> integer, parameter :: big = 600
> character(kind=4,len=big) :: str1, str2
>
> do i=1,big, 10
> do j = 0,
With the following reduced test
program test
implicit none
integer :: i, j, k, ios
integer, parameter :: big = 600
character(kind=4,len=big) :: str1, str2
do i=1,big, 10
do j = 0, 9
k = i + j
str2(k:k) = char(65+j)
end do
end do
open(15, status='scratch',
On 02/16/2016 05:17 AM, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
>
>> Thanks for review. Committed to trunk r233436.
>
> The test gfortran.dg/read_bang4.f90 fails on x86_64-apple-darwin15:
>
> a.out(15552,0x7fff7b2e3000) malloc: *** error for object 0x7fb472804c00:
> pointer being freed was not
On 02/16/2016 12:06 AM, Christophe Lyon wrote:
> On 15 February 2016 at 23:16, Janne Blomqvist
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Jerry DeLisle
>> wrote:
>>> The title of the PR should be "Mishandling of namelist comments" or
>>>
Hi Jerry,
> Thanks for review. Committed to trunk r233436.
The test gfortran.dg/read_bang4.f90 fails on x86_64-apple-darwin15:
a.out(15552,0x7fff7b2e3000) malloc: *** error for object 0x7fb472804c00:
pointer being freed was not allocated
*** set a breakpoint in malloc_error_break to debug
On 15 February 2016 at 23:16, Janne Blomqvist wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
>> The title of the PR should be "Mishandling of namelist comments" or
>> "Interpreting '!' as a comment in non-namelist reads".
>>
>>
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 11:45 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote:
> The title of the PR should be "Mishandling of namelist comments" or
> "Interpreting '!' as a comment in non-namelist reads".
>
> The attached patch fixes the regression by reverting the previous attempt at
> namelist
The title of the PR should be "Mishandling of namelist comments" or
"Interpreting '!' as a comment in non-namelist reads".
The attached patch fixes the regression by reverting the previous attempt at
namelist comments that used only CASE_SEPARATOR to enable comments in namelists.
The approach
10 matches
Mail list logo