h64/aarch64.md (call_value_symbol): Check noplt
>> scenarios.
>> (call_symbol): Ditto.
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/noplt_1.c: New testcase.
>> * gcc.target/aarch64/noplt_2.c: Ditto.
>>
>
> ((Though do check the ChangeLog
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:21:25AM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
>
> Jeff Law writes:
>
> > On 06/23/2015 02:29 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
> >
> >>> If you try disabling the REG_EQUAL note generation [*], you'll probably
> >>> find a
> >>> performance regression on arm32 (and probably on aarch64
Alexander Monakov writes:
>> Attachment is the patch which repair -fno-plt support for AArch64.
>>
>> aarch64_is_noplt_call_p will only be true if:
>>
>> * gcc is generating position independent code.
>> * function symbol has declaration.
>> * either -fno-plt or "(no_plt)" attribute speci
> Attachment is the patch which repair -fno-plt support for AArch64.
>
> aarch64_is_noplt_call_p will only be true if:
>
> * gcc is generating position independent code.
> * function symbol has declaration.
> * either -fno-plt or "(no_plt)" attribute specified.
> * it's a external functio
Jeff Law writes:
> On 06/23/2015 02:29 AM, Ramana Radhakrishnan wrote:
>
>>> If you try disabling the REG_EQUAL note generation [*], you'll probably
>>> find a
>>> performance regression on arm32 (and probably on aarch64 as well?
>>> we only
>>
>> IMHO disabling the REG_EQUAL note generation is
