Re: [ARM] fix big.LITTLE spec rewriting

2014-01-27 Thread Ramana Radhakrishnan
On 21/01/14 10:52, James Greenhalgh wrote: + names passed from the commend line will be in ARGV, we want s/commend/command. Otherwise OK if no regressions. Thanks, Ramana

Re: [ARM] fix big.LITTLE spec rewriting

2014-01-23 Thread James Greenhalgh
*Ping* On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:52:14AM +, James Greenhalgh wrote: Hi, As with the AArch64 case, ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01317.html ) the way that we rewrite command lines for big.LITTLE systems causes bugs where more than one source file is to be used.

[ARM] fix big.LITTLE spec rewriting

2014-01-21 Thread James Greenhalgh
Hi, As with the AArch64 case, ( http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg01317.html ) the way that we rewrite command lines for big.LITTLE systems causes bugs where more than one source file is to be used. The solution here is identical to that proposed for AArch64, we update the spec