On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 2:01 PM, Tobias Burnus
wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:30:39PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
>> > OK for the 4.9 branch?
>> I think for a system 0.14 ISL build which I just checked you need to
>> adjust the ISL version check as well.
>
> Confirmed. Using additionally the
On Thu, Dec 04, 2014 at 12:30:39PM +0100, Richard Biener wrote:
> > OK for the 4.9 branch?
> I think for a system 0.14 ISL build which I just checked you need to
> adjust the ISL version check as well.
Confirmed. Using additionally the following patch survives bootstrapping
here with
--with-isl=
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Tobias Burnus
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> the attached patches permit an in-tree build of GCC 4.9 using
> CLooG with ISL-0.14 backend and ISL-0.14 - as wished by Richard.
>
> The CLooG patches have been extracted from the CLooG git repository
> and have been included as
On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 4:24 PM, Tobias Burnus
wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> the attached patches permit an in-tree build of GCC 4.9 using
> CLooG with ISL-0.14 backend and ISL-0.14 - as wished by Richard.
>
> The CLooG patches have been extracted from the CLooG git repository
> and have been included as
Dear all,
the attached patches permit an in-tree build of GCC 4.9 using
CLooG with ISL-0.14 backend and ISL-0.14 - as wished by Richard.
The CLooG patches have been extracted from the CLooG git repository
and have been included as courtesy for Linux distribution people.
I do not intent to backp
