On 08/05/16 12:06, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I've committed this patch to fix a failed assertion. unify's (pt.c) default
case asserts EXPR_P(parm), but TRAIT_EXPR is tcc_exceptional, so fails.
However from unify's POV it's no more exceptional th
On Fri, Aug 5, 2016 at 8:24 AM, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
> I've committed this patch to fix a failed assertion. unify's (pt.c) default
> case asserts EXPR_P(parm), but TRAIT_EXPR is tcc_exceptional, so fails.
> However from unify's POV it's no more exceptional than, say, SIZEOF_EXPR, so
> should be
I've committed this patch to fix a failed assertion. unify's (pt.c) default
case asserts EXPR_P(parm), but TRAIT_EXPR is tcc_exceptional, so fails. However
from unify's POV it's no more exceptional than, say, SIZEOF_EXPR, so should be
allowed at that point.
nathan
2016-08-05 Nathan Sidwell
