This caused
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55081
--
Roman Zhuykov
From: Hans-Peter Nilsson h...@axis.com
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2012 02:13:32 +0200
There's now an excess error:
x/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/23_containers/bitset/45713.cc:24:55:
error: size of array 'test' is not an integral constant-expression
int test[sizeof(std::bitset0x) != 1 ? 1 :
From: Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
Date: Tue, 2 Oct 2012 14:56:29 +0200
2012-10-02 Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com
cp/
* cp-tree.h (SIZEOF_EXPR_TYPE_P): Define.
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Handle SIZEOF_EXPR with
SIZEOF_EXPR_TYPE_P.
...etc.
Looks like this
On 10/02/2012 08:56 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
Perhaps maybe_constant_value already does all that integral_constant_value
does, but I'm not sure about it.
It does, you can remove that call.
OK with that change.
Jason
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com a écrit:
--- gcc/cp/call.c.jj 2012-09-27 12:45:49.0 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/call.c 2012-10-01 17:53:17.594609236 +0200
@@ -557,7 +557,10 @@ null_ptr_cst_p (tree t)
{
/* Core issue 903 says only literal 0 is a null pointer constant. */
On Wed, Oct 03, 2012 at 11:14:37AM +0200, Dodji Seketeli wrote:
Jakub Jelinek ja...@redhat.com a écrit:
--- gcc/cp/call.c.jj2012-09-27 12:45:49.0 +0200
+++ gcc/cp/call.c 2012-10-01 17:53:17.594609236 +0200
@@ -557,7 +557,10 @@ null_ptr_cst_p (tree t)
{
/*
